|
W∴ Balboos wrote: It also installs un-asked-for applications
And you think only the Chinese do this, my samsung has 52+ (I haven't counted recently) applications it "updates" when I let it. I use probably 10 and have installed only 5 of those. The wife (who does not know what Play Store is) has samsung that dings at her all the time for some unknown reason.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity -
RAH
I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP
|
|
|
|
|
Well, then, my wife's LG hasn't done any of this. Maybe I've just discovered brand loyalty.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
At the risk of getting flogged here, have you seen/considered the new Samsung Z flip? No, I am not affiliated, I am just waiting t get my hans on the S20+ for the Time of Flight camera.
|
|
|
|
|
I feel it's a waste to spend $100 on a phone - the phone I'm replacing is an LG450.
I use the damn thing as a telephone - only. Voice and voice mail, period.
And - at a risk of becoming a rant - anyone who'd spend in the neighborhood of $1000 for a phone is ![Elephant | [mastadon]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/elephant.gif) ing nuts . . . and nuts is so damn polite compared to the place on their own anatomy I believe they use for a ski-mask.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
I'm using a ZTE Cymbal-T. Android 5.1, flips, is under 100$ USD.
|
|
|
|
|
So far, it seems like it's a "TracPhone" only device.
I'm considering going into the prepaid world - but not quite yet.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
The question on the floor is: Would (will) you trust your life to a self-driving car?
My own answer: "NO!". I will post my reasoning later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I really want to say no - but the quality of driving I see as the next generation gets behind the wheel makes me think:
"I would trust it to by mandatory for these new drivers" - since they're way too dumb and self-involved to share the road with others - and they drive that way (it is their road, isn't it?).
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
I'll just agree, if I say any more I'll get started and there's probably a limit on the length of a post.
I'll just say; without their phones they wouldn't/couldn't survive!
Monday starts Diarrhea awareness week, runs until Friday!
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
A lot of us would be very interested in the rant...
My plan is to live forever ... so far so good
|
|
|
|
|
Good point! Driver's Ed doesn't teach driving. I'm not sure what it teaches, but it sure doesn't teach driving--unless you live in a Nordic country like Belgium or Norway--there, they are required to teach such things as control skids, power slides, etc., because of icy roads.
|
|
|
|
|
rjmoses wrote: Good point! Driver's Ed doesn't teach driving.
You're assuming they're taking driver's ed.
|
|
|
|
|
Go to QA.
Read a couple of hundred questions.
Self driving cars? You'll never use a bank, airplane, or mobile phone again ... 
TBH: compared to the quality of driving you get from trained, licenced, apparently legal drivers I suspect that a self driving car that drove itself into a tree one trip out of a thousand would be preferable company on the roads. It won't get drunk. It won't read the paper, text its mates, perform sex acts, disappear to have a rummage in the glove box, or just have such an intense chat with a passenger that eye contact is essential for minutes at a time. It won't let itself out on the road if it has a serious car defect, or if it's been disqualified, isn't insured, or - possibly - even stolen.
It won't drive the wrong way into traffic to get away from the police, it won't deliberate drive though pedestrian areas, it won't drive 10cm from your rear bumper because it's in a hurry - if it does, it's talking to the car in front and savign road space and energy.
Persuade me that all human drivers are better than that, before you try to prevent self driving cars ...
In a generation, manual driving will probably be frowned upon like drunk driving is today, and will almost certainly be illegal.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
My wife and I had a discussion this morning about driver's high on pot in Illinois since it is legal here now.
|
|
|
|
|
It's illegal here, and they now have a roadside test for Coke and Pot. If you fail, it's down the station for a blood test to see if you are over the limit.
Yes: the UK has a "Legal limit" for illegal drugs ... 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Agree it's a generational thing, and will become widely adopted over time. Happens through a combination of better self-driving vehicles and acceptance by society that's (now) used to it. Remember how people used to value their private information? But, you grow up in a society where that's not valued, you don't know any different.
In terms of whether I'd trust it, depends. I believe in the power of technology to overcome complex problems--eventually. Agree also that it can become better than most drivers today (myself included of course--though I'm an excellent driver [Dustin Hoffman voice]  )
The first many iterations, I'd want an attentive attendant ready to take over to (hopefully) avoid any more of the problems we've seen. I don't have a feel for how many real-world iterations we'd need until we could say, "yeah, this is safe enough and ready for production."
|
|
|
|
|
Eventually I will.
They will suss them out I am sure, and even if accidents do occur it will still be a lot less then the current idiots on the roads cause.
|
|
|
|
|
Might be. As a matter of fact, I trust more the self-driving metro than the human driven one.
|
|
|
|
|
Would you trust a self-signed certificate?
|
|
|
|
|
Given the sort of questions and sample code I see in QA, then no way.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, if you don't send them the codez they ask for, it's really your own fault! 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.
Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
Have you seen my code? 
|
|
|
|
|
While I certainly enjoy manual driving, the move to self-driving vehicles simply has more pros than cons. Generations to either side of me are the worst drivers, so I want those safety risks removed. 
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
