|
Ummm no, got in to trouble for raising JIRA was sent on a course, now know less than I did before...
|
|
|
|
|
Jira has become a victim of its own success. It started out as a bug management tool and it has bolted "feature" after "feature" on top. Each one has become more and more clunky because the underlying model was never meant to behave in the ways that people want to use it now.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
I can see it for sure.
Full Reset
|
|
|
|
|
Don't you know that JIRA stands for Junior IRA ?
Oops, soooooapbox remark 
|
|
|
|
|
So I have a post build event in my .csproj with the idea that I want to run dotnet publish after I built the code in Visual Studio. But, because dotnet publish picks up the post build event as well, guess what. Inf***ingite loop.
Why why why?
Latest Article - A Concise Overview of Threads
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
Off the top of my head, something like this might work.
<Target Name="PostPackNugetDeploy" AfterTargets="Pack" Condition="'$(Configuration)' == 'Release'">
<Exec Command="="dotnet nuget push AppLogger.1.0.0.nupkg -k qz2jga8pl3dvn2akksyquwcs9ygggg4exypy3bhxy6w6x6 -s https:
</Target>
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
The arrangement of
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: Off the top of my head,
and
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: This space for rent
Made me chuckle.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: Off the top of my head
Please tell me you didn't have qz2jga8pl3dvn2akksyquwcs9ygggg4exypy3bhxy6w6x6 floating around in your head somewhere!
Latest Article - A Concise Overview of Threads
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
Lol. No, I copied the dotnet publish from the MSDN docs.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
Can't you use a CI system of some sort ? CAKE seems to be quite simple ...
|
|
|
|
|
RickZeeland wrote: Can't you use a CI system of some sort ? CAKE seems to be quite simple ...
I was hoping not to -- all I want is to publish to an arm processor and then use PuTTY's command line pscp to copy the files.
Technically, yes, I should use a CI to trigger the the publish and copy only the files that have changed, but I thought I'd try a "simple" post-event build step first.
Latest Article - A Concise Overview of Threads
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visual Studio sets a $(BuildingInsideVisualStudio) property to true when a build started from inside VS.
I think that using this property inside a conditional will do what you want:
<Choose>
<When Condition="$(BuildingInsideVisualStudio)==true">
<PropertyGroup>
<PostBuildEvent>dotnet publish "$(MSBuildProjectDirectory)"</PostBuildEvent>
</PropertyGroup>
</When>
</Choose>
Since VS is invoking the dotnet CLI, the PostBuildEvent won't be triggered a second time since the second build was kicked off by the CLI executable and not VS.
Hopefully I correctly understood what you're trying to accomplish. 
|
|
|
|
|
Ryan Peden wrote: Visual Studio sets a $(BuildingInsideVisualStudio) property to true when a build started from inside VS.
Hah! My google-fu was not up to snuff when I tried searching for such a thing earlier. Thank you!
Latest Article - A Concise Overview of Threads
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
Because recursion is awesome! 
|
|
|
|
|
A while back I picked up my first 4k monitor - a Dell U2515H ultrasharp. They are out of production now, but the model that replaced it simply blows compared to the U2515H. If you don't have one or more 4k monitors, you're missing things. VS is actually usable with all of the real-estate available.
Back to cubicle conversations...
Charlie Gilley
<italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape...
"Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
|
|
|
|
|
Personally I don't see the fuss that is made of 4K the human eye can't detect any real difference...
|
|
|
|
|
It's more of a real-estate issue. I can actually have multiple working tabs open in my development tools without occlusion.... but I agree with the comment about the eye...
Charlie Gilley
<italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape...
"Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
|
|
|
|
|
But we're not talking about a TV across a room, we're talking about a monitor on a desk.
I use a 4K 40" TV as my monitor (well, one of them anyway). That means I get 3840x2160 on a display 40 inches across. Human eye limits or not, that means I get twice the resolution (for each axis) I would get if I was only spreading 1920x1080 across that same surface area. I get 4 times the real-estate, so what I could do on a 1080p monitor, I can do in a quarter of the space available. Which means I can load (and view) a lot more windows at the same time.
If the text was so small I'd need to rescale to 200%, then I'd agree--you're just blowing up 1 pixel to be rendered by 4 and that's a complete waste.
Those who don't see the point of the 8K displays currently being introduced at CES are all complaining about the lack of media availability. I don't care for watching movies at 8K - but if I could get a display that can show 7680x4320 for a reasonable amount of money, I'd be replacing my 4K monitor and the additional 1080p monitors with a single panel.
|
|
|
|
|
I love my dual 27" curved monitors. ![Jig | [Dance]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/jig.gif)
Latest Article - A Concise Overview of Threads
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
I'm pretty fond of my three: 1 * 22" in Portrait (Chrome), 1 * 22" in Landscape (Visual Studio), and 1 * 19" square jobbie (email and odds'n'ends). I have to move my head quite enough to keep working with them (but I can see 1 and 3 in my peripheral vision when concentrating on VS).
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
640 x 480 Make Pixels Great Again!
"If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"
|
|
|
|
|
I used to have 4 32" monitors setup in a vertical side-by-side on my desk. Each costs over $2K. Visual Studio doesn't play nice if you need to expand across monitors, it shudders. Got rid of all those and opt for a 55" 4K Samsung border-less, curved. Much better and smoother with VS. Beside it admires everyone walked by and it only cost 800 bucks. And much happier.
|
|
|
|
|
Last time I was looking at a monitor, 4k seemed to only be useful once you get to 30+ inches. I went with two 27 inch monitors instead. Thinking if I need more in a few years (second desk or whatever), I'd go 4k and 30+ inches then.
|
|
|
|
|
Why do the people with the loudest voices insist on talking over their cubicle walls? 0700 and reaching for the noise cancelling head phones.....
Charlie Gilley
<italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape...
"Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
