|
Certainly not their Mouse and Keyboard software (drivers + config utility). I was surprised to get an update for that a few weeks ago. The last time that thing prompted me to update it was in 2015 (I still have the timestamped downloads). And even then, that might have been me proactively seeking it out.
|
|
|
|
|
No, I was thinking about the incredible amount of forced updates that we like to complain about...
<sig notetoself="think of a better signature">
<first>Jim</first> <last>Meadors</last>
</sig>
|
|
|
|
|
Try Linux. It neeeever updates anything... Or Android apps...
|
|
|
|
|
That's gamification for you 
|
|
|
|
|
WOW-what does that mouse software do? transfer your system use to other party?
I do not fear of failure. I fear of giving up out of frustration.
|
|
|
|
|
add a firewall rule to disable access to internet to the updater exe
=====================================================
The grass is always greener on the other side of the fence
|
|
|
|
|
I get the impression that it might be just slightly over-engineered.
Is it compatible with Alexa?
...
Ah. A quick web-search shows that it uses "cloud-based configuration", meaning that it might even have a built-in web browser (because that's what hardware manufacturers think is an efficient way to access web files), and a ridiculously bloated update mechanism.
I second Nitin's suggestion: block it from accessing the Internet.
If it still thrashes (because it can't get access), dump it. A mouse that consumes more than a few K of system resources is a joke, and will be cr@p for gaming.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Super Lloyd wrote: I bought a Razer gaming mouse...
Obviously you didn't quite understand what it was for.
They're playing with you!
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Is it possible to create web application with both webforms and mvc?
|
|
|
|
|
|
A very simple search revealed this.......Mixing WebForms and MVC Razor Views
I'm sure there are others, but maybe you need to start with "How to search" before getting into fancy pants topics like mixing webforms and mvc.
|
|
|
|
|
Once you start down the dark path, forever will it dominate your destiny, consume you it will.
-Yoda
|
|
|
|
|
I have fairly powerful PC (8 core FX-9370 AMD with 64Gb), and had no problem to run anything even together, but now I installed Andriod Studio to start a new project and when Android Studio running the CPU never goes under 20%...
It is a Java thing or some Android Studio problem?
Any experience with this?
"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge". Stephen Hawking, 1942- 2018
|
|
|
|
|
Task Manager's Details tab should be able to tell you which process is hogging one of your cores. Sorting by CPU should make it obvious.
Process Explorer from Sysinternals might be able to show a little more details. But typically Task Manager is sufficient.
|
|
|
|
|
dandy72 wrote: Process Explorer from Sysinternals
A good one - for Windows... I'm on Linux with this...
"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge". Stephen Hawking, 1942- 2018
|
|
|
|
|
Every modern IDE that I know of sucks up CPU cycles at a crazy rate.
|
|
|
|
|
I never saw VS consuming CPU cycles just by being started, if I do not request it to perform some operation.
Plain editing (with IntelliSense support and immediate marking of syntax errors) is barely noticable on the CPU load. If I start the program I am developing to run under control of VS, there is of course some CPU load even when the program is at a breakpoint or waiting for input, with no active threads. This is to be expeced: VS monitors e.g. the heap and GC continously. But this is at such a level that I never though of it - nowhere close to 20%.
If you have threads running under the debugger, and these are in some active state, you must expect the CPU load to be somewhat higher than if you run the executable standalone, especially if you set a lot of conditional breakpoints, and those threads hit the breakpoint without satisfying the condition. Other debugging functions, like monitoring memory use etc., are also bound to take some resources.
So I cannot agree with your statement.
(For the sake of being impolite: But on the other hand, I have been using Eclipse...)
|
|
|
|
|
Member 7989122 wrote: Plain editing (with IntelliSense support and immediate marking of syntax errors) is barely noticable on the CPU load.
I see you're not familiar with ReSharper...
|
|
|
|
|
The only reason I do not use ReSharper is that it slows my PC down so much. I only have an old Phenom II x4 965 and no SSD, so it is quite noticeable. I'll start using it when I upgrade to an SSD.
|
|
|
|
|
djordje.nikolic97 wrote: The only reason I do not use ReSharper is that it slows my PC down so much
That was my point. No matter how fast a system is, ReSharper will find a way to make it feel sluggish.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I know that resharper slows down VS. but the project I came into has 190 c#\wpf sub projects. Very slow loading and compiling. It has evolved to get this large and no time to redesign it right.
|
|
|
|
|
I've seen this same issue with Arduino studio (it's written in Java) and I have to shut down the IDE all the time or the fans will run on my PC as the CPU usage goes way up.
Maybe Android Studio was checking for SDK updates or other types of updates. Or maybe Gradle (build system) is running in background?
Maybe it was still doing some background updating since you just installed it? Is it keeping high CPU now?
I haven't seen Android Studio be that bad and I do quite a bit of Android development. Every revision of Android Studio does get a bit more bloated however.
I Opened Android Studio and Watched Task Manager
I have the latest version Android Studio and I fired it up and it is sitting on the splash / open a project screen at about 0.8%. Then I opened a project and let it sit and it's at 0% while I'm doing nothing in it.
|
|
|
|
|
It was a background worker (I left it run overnight to finish) that installed a local copy of Gradle, even I have the latest already installed on shared location... After finishing it, it came to peace with the computer...
Wondering why the shared Gradle didn't satisfied it, maybe that I installed it under /opt...
"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge". Stephen Hawking, 1942- 2018
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: It was a background worker (I left it run overnight to finish) that installed a local copy of Gradle
Interesting. It is a bit disconcerting that it does this stuff in the background but doesn't even let you know so we see the behavior and can't really tell what is happening. It's not very helpful of the devs to not just give a warning that the background thing is running. Glad you discovered what it was.
|
|
|
|
|
"Speaking of Java"? who did this? wasn't me! 
Android studio only use 20% of your CPU? You must have one of those 100 cores new Xentreon ultimate CPU, don't you, hey?! 
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
