|
jgakenhe wrote: HR and many times management, does not know what a position consists of so they don't ever change the job description
Yeah, I think you are right on that one.
It's all boilerplate text.
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps it is a mistake. Maybe they really wanted to put stooping to mental requirements, as in "lower one's moral standards so far as to do something reprehensible"?
|
|
|
|
|
Tomaž Štih wrote: "lower one's moral standards so far as to do something reprehensible"
No, no. That's assumed. 
|
|
|
|
|
For the record, up to 10% of your time Stooping could be a lot...
I keep imagining walking into a shared office, and the Big Biker Guy says
"Boy, you've got a pretty face"
and suddenly I realize that Stooping is slang...
and that the company health plan covering STDs is NO LONGER a POSITIVE...
as the door locks behind me... that 10% number seems like 4hrs a week of getting stooped...
I'll PASS... No stooping! None!
|
|
|
|
|
Stooping... As in bowing to the Emperor of said company perhaps. 
|
|
|
|
|
This would make sense in my industry, and in fact might actually be less rigorous than required. Our products are commercial ink-jet printing systems, which include large presses. Operators wrangle rolls of paper that weigh several hundred pounds. The press itself has large, heavy components at or above head height. My group writes the software that controls the whole mess. Every so often we get to crawl around the thing trying to figure out why something's not right.
In other words, the ability to stoop/kneel/reach/stretch/lift/push/pull might be an appropriate part of the job description for a software developer.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
That would be difficult because it is such a large state of change. Sitting for days on end, then crawling, stooping, kneeling. Sounds kind of painful.
I like the sitting part best.  75% is a low number for me.
|
|
|
|
|
I assume all the bending and stooping would be done while bowing and grovelling before the masters.
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP.
|
|
|
|
|
In today's CP newsletter is a mention of AdMob. That got me to thinking:
I personally hate ads, and do my best to avoid them. If they end up detracting me from the app itself, I remove the app and move on to the next one. No app is so great that I must endure the intrusion and interference that all ads cause just so I can use the app. I never knowingly click on ads. As a developer, I would never consider adding them to my app. So...
Do others feel this way? For the developers that do incorporate ads, are they actually making (enough) money in such a fashion that it overshadows the hassle that users must endure?
What are your thoughts?
- DC
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
|
If the choice is between making $0 and making $x where x > 0, lots of folks will go with x even if x is a trivial amount of money. They can also hide behind the anonymity of a company name. So they can just get a new name if their first company gets bad press.
|
|
|
|
|
And that's it. I honestly agree with both: I hate ads but if I'd publish a free app I would put them anyway.
GCS d-- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
I agree, mobile ads should be banned. The developers who put all that time and effort into creating and supporting those apps should do it all for free because I have an unrealistic perception of the industry. After all, I work for free too...when my boss pointed out that all I was doing was "writing some if statements" I withdrew my annoying invoices and now instead of food I eat my sense of civic duty and rather than petrol I fuel my car with Google Play reviews.
|
|
|
|
|
They could sell the App instead of the ads. I haveca few Apps I would happily pay for but it is not an option.
I can pay to remove the ads but don't know if I have to pay for each existing or replacement device I have.,
Michael Martin
Australia
"I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible."
- Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
|
|
|
|
|
Hey,
Thought it strange you haven't posted about the sandpaper story yet? Or do you not follow cricket any more?
|
|
|
|
|
Check the Soapbox. A Griffin posted and I responded.
Michael Martin
Australia
"I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible."
- Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
can I interest you in a pouch for your glasses?
Signature ready for installation. Please Reboot now.
|
|
|
|
|
what I don't like is they "target" these ads and still present stupid shite ...
take one look a review of the latest star wars and you're ofen targeted to buy mickey mouse night lights because you looked at a disney product. (don't ever google "last longer" ....)
and if you buy the damn product it doesn't stop asking you to buy another one.
(Even Amazon does that ... "hey did you enjoy that screwdriver you just bought, look what we have for you right now, a screwdriver!!!")
If they made ads less stupid, more relevant and better timed maybe I'd look ... or not ... when I want something I'll ask.
Signature ready for installation. Please Reboot now.
|
|
|
|
|
If you're using Windows, the simplest way to deal with most of that is to add a few entries into your hosts file and redirect the major ad services to 0.0.0.0. Even their tracking scripts don't work after that unless they hard-coded their IP address and who does that anymore? It's that or get a script blocking browser add-on. Problem solved.
if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); }
|
|
|
|
|
Instead of maintaining your own hosts file yourself, have a look at Pi-Hole.
It's a DNS server you can install on a tiny Linux machine (originally intended for the RasPI, but it'll work in a small Linux VM). It'll block anything it recognizes as an ad server, plus you're free to blacklist/whitelist your own.
The benefit over maintaining your own hosts file is that once you've changed your router settings so it points to it, ads won't even make it to any device on your LAN. Windows, Linux, OS X, Android, iOS, game console, whatever.
Installation is practically a one-liner, so even if you can barely figure out how to install Linux in a VM, you should be able to get it going.
|
|
|
|
|
|
As user, I can tolerate ads. After all, in some cases, the apps are great stuff I've got for free.
|
|
|
|
|
My mobile phone is 100% ad free - read that as Flip-Phone!
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depends.
Some ads are worth allowing - CP for example exists only because of ad revenues, so I have the site whitelisted.
But apps with ads is different - it depends to an extent how good the app is and how intrusive the ads.
If you ad small ads that don't distract me from the app, and the app is a good 'un, then I'll pay to remove them - I think of it as a "shareware trial version". If the app is cr@p, or the ads get in the damn way then I'll review the app, say why it's rubbish so others are warned, and uninstall it.
But the ad supported model is a good way to try an app out and see if the coder has any idea what he's doing: far too many are obviously there just for ad revenue and to heck with the actual app!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I use to consider all advertisements as an aggression, too.
Not to mention that I hate all the marketing language bs.
"I'm neither for nor against, on the contrary." John Middle
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
