|
I am not wrong.
Projects are organized in a solution. There's a different file for customizations.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: It does not hold toolbar-customizations; it is a list of all the project-files in the solution.
I was wrong about the customization, however, I see one file listed, my project has well over a dozen.
I don't wish to turn this into a debate, I did test deleting the sln file and was prompted to save new one, that part works.
Cheers!
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
S Houghtelin wrote: I see one file listed, my project has well over a dozen.
Because it is not a project file, but a solution - a list of proj files.
S Houghtelin wrote: I don't wish to turn this into a debate
It was a correction, not an invitation to a debate indeed.
Solution (.Sln) File[^]
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Member 10549474 wrote: Recently updated Visual Studio
A boy scout motto is "once your camp fire is burning OK a sure way to put it out is to try and improve it."
... I've found microsoft products are exactly like that.
(in fact even more-so, because camp fires I sometimes have managed to improve.)
Signature ready for installation. Please Reboot now.
|
|
|
|
|
Lopatir wrote: A boy scout motto is "once your camp fire is burning OK a sure way to put it out is to try and improve it."
... I've found microsoft products are exactly like that.
Set MS software on fire and let it burn.
Gotcha.
|
|
|
|
|
Just for fun, and because we're all friends here in The Lounge (with a possible exception or two (they know they aren't welcome actually, but post nonsense anyway)), unzip this original assembly of "projection" from the ... uhm ... package into a brand new target directory. To avoid any cross-contamination/etc. Now, comment out the .suo alone. Make it "x.suo.manifest".
NOW open the .sln ... does this (gulp) help any?
|
|
|
|
|
Well, it seems pretty random - it doesn't do it with all projects, nor all the time.
For instance, opened a project, looked at the design of the form, but couldn't, loads of 'errors'. So just closed down Visual Studio, started it up again and went and loaded the same project file and just sat waiting for ten seconds or so, then took deep breath and looked at design of form - all worked perfectly. Do you think I was just too fast trying to look at the form and Visual Studio was still 'loading' part of the project?
|
|
|
|
|
Late to the game and havent read through all the replies yet. There is/was a ticket open with MS on this behavior. Some even had similar project problems in c#. But it was mostly vb projects. The workaround that I found solved this problem was to turn off "allow parallel project I initialization" in VS options. Restart VS and load your project.. this also is supposed to be fixed in 15.5.2.
I downloaded it end of day Friday so will be formally testing it this morning. Else parallel project initialization gets turned off again.
|
|
|
|
|
I always load my forms into a text editor. Never any problem.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think it is anything to do with .sln or .vbproj files...
I have found now, that almost invariably when I open a project, either by opening the .sln or .vbproj file, the first time you do so, and look at the design page of a form, it is full of errors and you are unable to view the form.
So, now I just close down Visual Studio altogether, start it up again and load exactly the same file in the same way and it all works fine - the design page shows my form as it should be. Gawd knows why...
I think over xmas I'll format the HDD, reinstall Windows from scratch and reinstall VS - the PC is taking longer to boot up anyway, so it is about time, I suppose. And the TV won't be worth watching anyway... 
|
|
|
|
|
1Minute Nature is a Dutch series of short vignettes in which children from the Netherlands reflect on how they experience nature. In this episode, 11-year-old Lieuwe recalls finding his pet cat dead, and gives an imaginative (if not entirely accurate) account of what will happen to the cat’s body after he buries it, grappling with the universal human struggle to process death by finding a slightly macabre, but funny link between himself and the dead pet. [^]
I think this boy has a future in ecology.
«While I complain of being able to see only a shadow of the past, I may be insensitive to reality as it is now, since I'm not at a stage of development where I'm capable of seeing it.» Claude Levi-Strauss (Tristes Tropiques, 1955)
|
|
|
|
|
So that's why my milk tastes of my ex-wife.
|
|
|
|
|
F-ES Sitecore wrote: So that's why my milk tastes of my ex-wife
That statement has all sorts of disturbing overtones. Well done.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
That kid's head is going to explode when he hears Neil deGrasse Tyson explain where we get our atoms from.
|
|
|
|
|
Continued from below:
English to Shakespearean Translator
There's also this one, but as far as I can tell, it only translates single words (and it's not very good at that either):
Old English Translator
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
Not as funny as I thought:
if 't be true( document. Signatures != null)
{
f'reach(documentsignature signature in document. Signatures )
{
database. Documentsignatures. Fordid(signature );
}
}
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
|
|
|
|
|
Shakespearean QA: Prithee sir sen codz
|
|
|
|
|
"We doth not homew'rk" 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
modified 15-Dec-17 9:03am.
|
|
|
|
|
A cookery book from 1615: Recipe for pancakes etc:
Countrey Contentments, or the English Huswife[^]
Interesting English, reads quite like modern english, except for the switching of v and u, and the f for an s.
It has some great spellings too, I want to bring back 'slic't' and 'chopt', 'mixe' and 'beate'!
modified 15-Dec-17 7:35am.
|
|
|
|
|
Munchies_Matt wrote: A cookery book from 1615
Cool, that's the time I usually start cooking anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
The "elongated" f for s doesn't bother me. (It's like half an eszett in German), but I've never seen an actual f used. Weird.
|
|
|
|
|
It isnt an actual f, I just cant find the elongated s that looks like an f without the cross bar on my keyboard! 
|
|
|
|
|
Trivial information alert.
This is actually called a descending s. It was used for the s anywhere in the word except at the end (with rare exceptions), and not the second s when doubled. E.g., I once viʃited Miʃsiʃsippi. The trip was a ʃucceʃs.
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP.
|
|
|
|
|
perhapf they were ufing the microfoft ergonomic keyboard?
Signature ready for installation. Please Reboot now.
|
|
|
|
|
GenJerDan wrote: but I've never seen an actual f used
5 lines up on the second page - last word 'frycafe'. The first f is an actual f. Also fryingpan in the middle of that paragraph.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
