|
Mon disjoncteur est déclencher
My circuit breaker is tripping
déclencher has the meaning of "trip" or "trigger"
cherchez la femme!
|
|
|
|
|
To trip, as in fall over, is trebucher (like the catapult), but I would use debrancher, which is to disconnect or unplug.
|
|
|
|
|
In Québec we would say something like:
"Le breaker a sauté"
also
"Le disjoncteur a sauté" is good.
Hope it helps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage is a good translation for trip. Voyager would be the verb.
But it's not the right context.
Sauter as previously mention sound like a nice fit. (heard it a lot)
Surcharger would also fit, though I heard it less often when talking about breaker.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi there from the Province of Québec.
Trip translates to voyage.
Now for your last sentence:
Mon disjoncteur se déclenche... il ne va pas en croisière aux Caraïbes.
Bonne journée
Gilles Plante
|
|
|
|
|
So weird:
In google search, I write "translate My circuit breaker is tripping off in french"
And I get:
"Mon disjoncteur se déclenche"
Which for me, being french, looks perfect.
In fact, I think that "to trip off" could be translated in 'Disjoncter'.
In French, you should not say "Mon disjoncteur disjoncte", this is not beautiful...
So, google's right.
Hoping that my 2 cents helps...
Christian
|
|
|
|
|
How about using the word Trigger which in French is Gâchette. To trip a switch would be to also trigger it.
|
|
|
|
|
The word you are looking for is "sauter" = to jump
The circuit breaker tripped = "le déjoncteur a sauté"
|
|
|
|
|
A circuit breaker is a coupe-circuit (masculine: (the) le coupe-circuit, (a) un coupe-circuit, (my) mon coupe-circuit...
In context, to trip is déclencher (verb) déclenchement (noun)
My circuit breaker is tripping off, mon coupe-circuit se déclenche. In French, you cannot abbreviate "coupe" the way you could "breaker" in English.
Hope this helps
|
|
|
|
|
Try here[^]
particularly section 441.
|
|
|
|
|
The usual verb in French, in this case, is 'sauter'. For example 'les plombs ont sauté' (the fuses tripped/blew)
|
|
|
|
|
|
For my current job, I was required to get my MCSA certificate. I obtained this certification, which means I should be able to perform most SQL Server admin duties.
Another requirement is that I obtain a Security+ certificate, which demonstrates that I am cognizant of the myriad of security threats, and how to spot/mitigate them. I obtained this certification.
Finally, I have a secret clearance.
New tasking requires that I create SSIS packages and SQL Server jobs that run them. Creating the packages is no big deal, but when it comes to the SQL jobs, things have gotten "sticky".
0) I can create the job.
1) I cannot RUN the job manually. (insufficient permissions)
2) I cannot EDIT the job. (insufficient permissions)
3) I cannot change the owner of the job (which is required so that I can run the job manually). (insufficient permissions)
4) The Info Management DBAs want to control the server, but don't have (or don't want to provide) the services necessary for SSIS development support.
What was the point in requiring me to obtain the listed certifications if it doesn't allow me access to do my f*ckin job?
At this point, because the Information Assurance people are being asshats, this has been escalated to command staff, and I'm still sitting on my thumbs waiting for a meeting to happen.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
I assume that the database is stored in this write-only memory device. 
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: this write-only memory device
Brilliant stuff!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I'll admit, I read footnote 7.
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like you work for either the government or s company that does government contract work. Too bad you can't walk in with one of your <al pachino="" cuban="" accent="">'leetle frens'.
|
|
|
|
|
MarkTJohnson wrote: Sounds like you work for either the government
The thought:
"I don't work for the government, and the government doesn't work for me"
has a cute double meaning.
Marc
Latest Article - Merkle Trees
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, you may marry my daughter and provide me with grandchildren; but no, you may not have sex with her.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I used to work for a large Aircraft and Aerospace company that shall remain nameless. During that time I wrote a report on certain software issues that needed addressing. This report went in to the secure document store (everything was on paper back then, no terminals; most code was on punched cards produced from hand written FORTRAN coding sheets). After a couple of months, I found some more issues and wanted to update the document only to be refused access to it because I didn't have the right clearance level! I wrote the report but I wasn't allowed to read it! It took me six months to get vetted for final security clearance to work on the project I was supposed to be working on.
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
They made you do certification which, if I remember correctly, you considered useless (or was it CG?). They have won already.
"It is easy to decipher extraterrestrial signals after deciphering Javascript and VB6 themselves.", ISanti[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
No, you're right - I consider it useless, but I'm sure that outlook is shared by a number of developers.
If they piss me off, and I quit, they lose because then they have NOBODY that can do the work, much less anybody they can refuse access to. Therefore, the DBAs inherit the stuff I was trying to do, and everybody suffers because they claim to be understaffed, and with nobody that has the requisite skillset (even if they weren't understaffed). That means the mission is at risk. Oh to be a fly on the wall when that realization occurs to them.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Well, given the tight "security" policies they have, they are actually understaffed (not by number). Even though they are paying you, you do not have enough rights to perform your job.
I wonder how the DBAs might be feeling about this policy. I did work in this type of environment for a while and nobody was happy. Almost everything got delayed because one who was supposed to do work did not have right and the one who had right was either overloaded or just pissed off by his work life.
Did they just changed your job title to Chief Certificationist without telling you? Looks like that is all you can do there.
"It is easy to decipher extraterrestrial signals after deciphering Javascript and VB6 themselves.", ISanti[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like you just need to grease the palm of whoever knows the SA password. 
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
