|
I can only assume you're trying to save money? The RDP situation really requires a server to connect to IMO.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you Jeremy,
It's not only the amount of electricity/money involved... I can see the situation: "it's Saturday morning and I do need to finish that before Monday and #$%& I've just shut the computer down without reason and now I can't work anymore..."
I've installed a dyndns-like service into the server, now it's only a matter of configuring the router and then it should be easy to send the WOL packet through internet.
Thanks! 
|
|
|
|
|
Since you raise the question, and there seems to be lack of a suitable solution suggested, I would like to introduce our solution. It just for your information, if you don't like it, just ignore it.
We had developed a SOCK 5 based inter-LAN tunneling system that only requires the installation of a server software. It's under internal tests now and will be published online soon (for a while, since it's kind of complex on our side). We are happy with its performance at present ...
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you Shuquian,
I've installed a dyndns-like service into the server, now it's only a matter of configuring the router and then it should be easy to send the WOL packet through internet.
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I know this is a solution. But the process is a little involved, don't you agree?
In general, VPN type of solutions are not scalable ones since one must make sure each of the LAN connected LAN to have different private address ranges. Otherwise, the system will not know how to route a data package. On the other hand, most LANs are most likely to use the same default private address spaces (like 192.168.1.*, etc) during initial setup. So there is the problem of reset them consistently ...
It may not be a problem for your situation, but in general it is not a small issue in an organization in which the networks have already been setup.
|
|
|
|
|
|
  
Hi raddevus!
Impressive!
At the end though... I've installed a dyndns-like service into the server, now it's only a matter of configuring the router and then it should be easy to send the WOL packet through internet.
In my case the shut down will be performed by the remote worker so it won't be needed to control it auto-magically.
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
You could setup the router with DynDns so that you then have an address e.g. joansoffice.dyndns.info that will always point to the correct IP.
You can then do whatever port forwarding or WOL stuff you need on the router to push the magic packet in the correct direction.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you DaveAuld,
As you suggested, I've installed a dyndns-like service into the server, now it's only a matter of configuring the router and then it should be easy to send the WOL packet through internet.
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Why on Earth would you make a computer sleep in the first place?
Just use the "Hollywood computer kill" method (switch off the monitor), and leave the silly thing awake.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you Mark,
It's not only the amount of electricity/money involved... I can see the situation: "it's Saturday morning and I do need to finish that before Monday and #$%& I've just shut the computer down without reason and now I can't work anymore..."
I've installed a dyndns-like service into the server, now it's only a matter of configuring the router and then it should be easy to send the WOL packet through internet.
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here's a handicap; get this test case right:
float[] data = { 1E30f, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 };
With a window of, say, 5. Doesn't really matter, just add more 1's if you want a bigger window.
What's the running average when the 1E30f leaves the window? Hopefully 1, but most implementations get this wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
Bugger! I hadn't spotted the "sliding window" requirement. 
I've updated my solution, and it does pass your test. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Should this post be sticky/stay on top, if not, at the end of the day, it will be pushed to the bottom and some people might miss it.
Bryian Tan
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm done with Wired - I want my science sciencey, not political. Stick to the facts, that's all I want - I neither need, want nor appreciate your personal opinions - I leave that to the media and a higher power - my wife.
|
|
|
|
|
If you want facts, then stop reading any website and stick to CSV files.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do you think you might want to write the editors at Wired about this ?
I stopped reading it a long time ago after, imho, it became a nest of narcissistic techno-savants too busy with flaunting their own grandiosity to write articles whose content interested me. I saw the word "meme" in it so many times, I developed a rash.
cheers, Bill
«There is a spectrum, from "clearly desirable behaviour," to "possibly dodgy behavior that still makes some sense," to "clearly undesirable behavior." We try to make the latter into warnings or, better, errors. But stuff that is in the middle category you don’t want to restrict unless there is a clear way to work around it.» Eric Lippert, May 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
I believe there is a "rash" meme somewhere out there...
I'm retired. There's a nap for that...
- Harvey
|
|
|
|
|
"... I leave that to the media and a higher power ..."
How is that Wired is NOT the media? What else would they be?
|
|
|
|
|
Rick York wrote: How is that Wired is NOT the media?
Ah, you spotted that...
|
|
|
|
|
It was the article on cats and schizophrenia, wasn't it? 
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
You're confused. Or you're not. Maybe you are. Where's my kitten? You're confused.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
