|
Pirates this time: Guinea Pirate[^]
But fear not! Chris is issuing Special Equipment[^] to all workers.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
 So cute. How about weapon?
Bryian Tan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of course - How else do you think they power the CP servers? 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
Probably 10 inches, though it's tapering down now, but decided to stay home and work on fun stuff - Beaglebone, RS485 multidrop bus, Python, FlowSharpCode for a client. So even though I'm not at my day job (hourly contract work) I'm still making $$$.
Here's a screenshot (I hope the link works) of what I've been doing.
The stuff on the left is the C# code that SFTP's the .py files to the Beaglebone when I click on the "Send Files" button (note it's part of the canvas)
The stuff on the right is the Python code for testing the dual UART on the cape my client built.
The way it works is, I run the C# app (FlowSharpCode compiles and executes it), edit the python files, click on "Send Files" which sends a message via WebSockets to the C# code, which then queries FlowSharpCode for the .py files and SFTP's them to the Beaglebone for testing.
At some point, I'm going to implement a wee little server on the Beaglebone so I can tell it to start the app and figure out how to redirect the Python app's STDOUT (that should be pretty simple, right, ah, but this is Linux ) and send the output back to FlowSharpCode to display in the output window.
Well, anyways, I'm having FUN! ![Jig | [Dance]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/jig.gif)
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
I would like 10 inches of snow - it is about 3 days home... I need some sleep...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: Well, anyways, I'm having FUN!
and that really is the whole point, isn't it? Why do it if you are not having fun (if you can help it). 
|
|
|
|
|
NO CHANCE!
If you answer this question by randomly picking one of the answers, what are your chances to get it right?
a) 25%
b) 0%
c) 25%
d) 50%
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
General Failure reading Brain A:
Abort, Retry, Fail?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I was hoping 37.5% would be an option..... 
|
|
|
|
|
d) but I wouldn't get it right by picking d).
Slogans aren't solutions.
|
|
|
|
|
I didn't ask which answer is right... Right? 
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Good point!
Slogans aren't solutions.
|
|
|
|
|
e) +++ Divide By Cucumber Error. Please Reinstall Universe And Reboot +++
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for that, Richard. 
|
|
|
|
|
Well - if we ignore the values - then it's 25% (a, b, c, or d).
Certainly that's how it would be graded on a multiple choice test.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
W∴ Balboos wrote: if we ignore the values
Why should we? It is A question not ANY question...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
We ignore the values because you said that we select one at random.
Thus, we make a presumption that one of the answers is correct.
Secondly, we select one at random. Thus, we make no consideration of their values or even an implied question.
Therefore, with four selections we've a 25% chance of selecting correctly.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
But two of the answers are the same. So if that's the right answer, you've got twice as much chance of picking it.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
That's true if all else were equal and no consideration was given to it being multiple choice.
However - that's a vagary in the question: if it's an absolute answer then there's a weighted probability of guessing correctly. If it's graded as multiple choice, the values are irrelevant, only the number of choices.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Random - the way to choose the answer, but then one have to decide if the answer is right or not, like in a exam you wasn't prepared for...
Now for finding the chance to pick the right, you have to know which is it... For instance if the right answer is a) and c), you have more chance than with b) and d)...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
You're now implying further knowledge than would be conducive to a random selection. Your question is framed so as to be a multiple-choice which implies only one correct selection.
BUT, if I were in a calculation mood, I'd solve it by summing each individual probability and then dividing by all choices (none of which diminish the pool size):
( 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/2 + 1/4)/4 = 1.5/4 or 0.375 . It's just that, as written, that would not be correct. The question needs some refinement if you're going for a calculated answer.
Picking at random implies each answer is discrete and correctness checked by a selection and not a value. So, 0.25 is the answer as the question is written.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
There is no 'further knowledge' here!!! Everything is known! The question and the possible choices too...
And I didn't asked to pick the right answer from a-d, but to answer the question...
W∴ Balboos wrote: Picking at random implies each answer is discrete and correctness checked by a selection and not a value.
Totally wrong! It implies nothing (or maybe it implies that some used to come to exams unprepared and failed back to the old method of game play). It was true if I were stating, that by random pick you can get a right answer...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: Totally wrong!
OK - then let me go into my (one-question!) exam totally unprepared.
I pick an answer at random (as you stipulated). How is this going to be graded? What is you method of defining the correct answer amongst(a, b, c, d). If a, b, c, or d is how the answer is stipulated, does your grading schema allow for either of two answers have the potential of being correct?
Had you simply said: if you guess at the answer (not randomly guess) - I would agree with you. You have completely redefined the decision making process with that word: none. The only escape is to not grade based upon a, b, c or d, but on a specific value.
This, alas, is a semantic disagreement.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
