|
It is interesting as I noticed the other day that Chrome has replaced Norton the Virus (sorry antivirus) in the flash update additional installs
Every day, thousands of innocent plants are killed by vegetarians.
Help end the violence EAT BACON
|
|
|
|
|
Given that Chrome (by Google) is based on the open-source Chromium, there should be avenues for innovation from below as it were. Google doesn't (yet) own the entire web, so there will be people out there pushing for new features. (OK, so I'm an optimist.)
I use Chromium on Linux a fair bit, and, without looking too closely, don't feel any real difference between -e and -ium.
Cheers,
Peter
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
There used to be a single unified browser, it was called Internet Explorer. Reading the between the lines in your eyes that was bad. Now that it is Chrome you seem to think that is going to be good? So it's really that you think a "unified browser" is good, it's more that you don't like IE?
I agree with the other person that said these browser fads come and go. When FF came out people acted like it was a cure for cancer and were screaming "Ha ha, IE is dying!!1". Now Chrome has come out people move to that and scream "Ha ha, IE is dying!!1". When the next browser comes out it'll be the same thing.
|
|
|
|
|
No, that's not what I'm saying.
I'm saying that a browser world where only Chrome matters is possibly going to arrive, and that while that's good from a developer POV (a single stable platform to develop against always helps us) I'm not sure it's a good idea from an innovation POV.
OK, there is still Safari out there, but if you discount FB and Twatter that dumps most of the iPhone / iPad internet usage anyway!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Which means we could have a single unified browser in a couple of years: Chrome. That's obviously good news for us as developers
You write that as if this a new thing that might happen in a few years and it could be good. But you're ignoring the fact that we already had that situation 10 years back with IE? The most likely reason you are ignoring that is because you don't mind saying "When Chrome is the only browser we need to worry about it wil be good", but you don't want to say "When IE was the only browser we had to worry about it was good".
Anyway, I think the way things are currently going which is heading toward a well-implemented set of standards is the best solution as then we can get to a truly browser-agnostic web. It won't neccesarily stifle innovation either. Browsers can still implement browser-specific tools and features that don't relate to html at all (the way download managers work, favourites, debug tools etc). As long as we stick to feature-based development rather than browser-based development then html can be extended too. Let's say IE decides to implement disabling the back button, the code would be like
if (window.disableBackButton) {
window.disableBackButton();
}
That way the page will function fine in non-IE browsers, and if Chrome or FF, or whatever new browser on the block wants to implement this then they can do, and maybe over time it could be considered to be brought into the standards.
History has already shown us that browser-based development is a bad idea and browsers that are too varied in their implementation of standards is a bad idea, and if one browser does turn out to be dominant and we go back to those bad old ways then we're simply repeating that history. The fact that the dominant browser is Chrome rather than IE won't alleviate any of those issues.
|
|
|
|
|
F-ES Sitecore wrote: There used to be a single unified browser, it was called Internet Explorer Netscape Navigator.
Fixed that for ya 
(How long until someone one-ups me with Lynx? gets the stopwatch)
|
|
|
|
|
I'd have said CompuServe, but I was trying to pitch to the right age group 
|
|
|
|
|
Ugh, now you're making me feel old.
CompuServe was a rip-off... We had Prodigy.
|
|
|
|
|
Won't happen. Now there seems to be space in the market for another browser as IE, Firefox and Edge fall off the edge in a heap, you can guarantee that Zuckerberg is working on 'FaceLook'©™® with integrated search engine that only searches that website he set up. Can't remember what it's called just now.
|
|
|
|
|
Even if IE/Edge fell to 1% you'd still have about 74,000,000[^] people that use it. All of them will be your "enterprise" customers that you don't want to lose
|
|
|
|
|
Except 1% of the market share is not the same as 1% of the world's population.
The estimate[^] is that 46.1% of the world's population have internet access.
So at 1%, you'd only have around 34 million users to worry about.
(And most of them will probably be stuck on IE6.)
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
And of that 46.1%, 38.5% are Nigerian princes trying to get their family fortune out of the country.
|
|
|
|
|
The single unified browser is just rainbows and unicorns -- it'll never happen. With adoption like that, Chrome is primed to become the next browser attack surface of choice, if it isn't already. After a while, it will get a bad name due to all its security vulnerabilities, and then people will start migrating to the next new one. History does repeat itself, over and over again.
We can program with only 1's, but if all you've got are zeros, you've got nothing.
|
|
|
|
|
[~]-o10b (8)
Hints:
1. Oh they make everything faster!
2. Guess what? You work on it every day
3.
PS: Sorry i forgott to set on tuesday, was off for 3 days. Hope someone solves this cause next week im on holidays
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
modified 2-Sep-16 5:52am.
|
|
|
|
|
NOTHING Not enough letters. 
|
|
|
|
|
That's funny, because I have got nothing either!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
|
4W
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
HobbyProggy wrote: 2. Guess what? You work on it every day
BUTTOCKS?
Because I sit on mine to work everyday!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
It was computer ...
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
ECO-TRUMP...
Wait, is that one pseudo-word, or two?
|
|
|
|
|
It's a tragedy and it's great that nobody was hurt but it's quite a show. The real fireworks start around 1:10.
SpaceX Rocket Explodes on Launchpad
if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); }
Meus ratio ex fortis machina. Simplicitatis de formae ac munus. -Foothill, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
Heard about it on the BBC News Channel, rather unimpressive footage, that is closer and you can see the bang better! 
|
|
|
|
|
Something went very very wrong with the upper stage propellant loading.
Marc
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
