|
They replaced the XML based build/project files with .json files. Unfortunately they ran into json limitations and now decided to go back to XML.
|
|
|
|
|
Nish Nishant wrote: Unfortunately they ran into json limitations and now decided to go back to XML.
Ah. Would be interesting to read what limitations they ran into.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Nish Nishant wrote: they ran into json limitations
From what I've read, it was more that they couldn't move every other VS project type to JSON at the same time, and they didn't want to have two separate project systems.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
The other issue they were having is that there isn't an easy way to write comments into JSON.
Eric
|
|
|
|
|
So they tested it thoroughly beforehand? 
|
|
|
|
|
That's the beauty of open sourcing your development. All the failed prototypes you abandon are out in public for the peanut gallery to snark at. 
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
very interesting article. Thanks for posting. 
|
|
|
|
|
You are welcome
|
|
|
|
|
And we can all breath a sigh of relief.
JSON is awesome for the things that it is awesome for. A config file that both humans and computers have to read is not one of those things.
|
|
|
|
|
Hooray Hooray for the Twelfth of May
Chicken Fat Canning Begins Today!
Why this? Scores of years ago I used to read MAD magazine. They had something called the “marginal thinking department”, which were little randomly located items in the margins of pages.The above was one of them. Finally, I remembered on THE day, itself, and needed to blurt it out. Hating to use a cliché, but it’s akin to a bucket-list event. With so many eyes having seen it, I feel quite the sense of relief.
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Huh?! (cultural reference missing)
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
I can't believe you aren't canning chicken fat yet!
|
|
|
|
|
My younger brother loved Mad magazine, so I never had to buy one.
New version: WinHeist Version 2.2.2 Beta I told my psychiatrist that I was hearing voices in my head. He said you don't have a psychiatrist!
|
|
|
|
|
There is a story going around that there is a device that can read your credit card information through your billfold, pocket book, and clothing. The information on the cards are on a magnetic strip and/or a chip. I've had to swipe my card more than once to get a reader at a store to read it. The more I think about it reading the strip or chip through all the above and not even rubbing up against the person carrying the card would be unlikely at best. An episode of NCIS had a girl doing just that.
Okay you knowers of all things tech, is this possible?
|
|
|
|
|
|
If criminals truly could do that then they would be better of starting a company to sell these super readers.
|
|
|
|
|
They can do it, it you have Contactless payment[^] cards - as all new ones in the UK seem to be.
The contactless payment bank cards just need to be offered to the shop reader for sums up to about £30, and RFID reads the card details and executes the transaction with no further input (such as PIN id). If you have the RFID reader then close proximity to the card in your wallet is sufficient. Crowded spaces (tube trains and so forth) ad good hunting grounds apparently.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I made my bank disable the contactless transactions on my card. Pickpockets are a friggin real danger, and this is only a different type of pickpocketing.
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
|
|
|
|
|
Snap - and Herself's as well.
OK, I don't go near the Tube, and I'm none too fond of crowds - but it's a solution looking for a problem to my mind.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I'm a commuter so tube, train and train-stations are frequent point of passage for me. Also I particularly enjoy comics conventions and book fairs (there is one in my hometown these days by the way, the Turin International Book Fair) and I know that many delinquent attend only to lift some pockets.
I very much prefer to pass the card and insert the pin, and only if I trust the commercial activity - many immigrant shops are barely legal and they sometimes use counterfeit POS to steal CC details. It's not paranoia if they're really out to get you...
Also the ATMs are sometimes at risk, in a town near where I live a band of skilled thieves sabotaged the insertion slot to clone the cards that passed along with the PIN. So I normally use only the indoors ATMs...
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: and I'm none too fond of crowds
Flocks are more your thing?
|
|
|
|
|
Your solution is akin to wearing a full wet suit in a light shower. The details available from the RFID are not the full card details and for some time actually use a dummy card number that will only work with contactless. This means that the maximum exposure you have is £30 to a registered merchant. Fraud readers cannot put the valid messages into the system as they are outside the network and do not have authentication keys.
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
|
Indeed - but £30's add up. It wouldn't be difficult for a perp to get a couple of dozen £30 a day on the Tube in Londinium, and that's tidy money which is unlikely to be spotted quickly, and unlikely to be reported if it is spotted.
Nice pay if you can get it...but I'd rather not be a victim.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Doesn't work that way.
Each device on the network is registered with the server, so when a request is made for a payment it's not automagically paid down the wire, but it goes to the registered owners account. If a device is not on the network it can read the cards but, crucially, not send in payment requests.
Now with the contactless, the details only work for a contactless device making a payment request. It's not like I can read your card # from a contactless reader and then use it yo shop on Amazon, the details are different.
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
