|
I had huge problems with crashes and hangs pre-update 1, but a combination of update 1 and unloading various 3rd party VS add-ins solved almost all of them. I won't touch VS2015 without update 1 now - odd that you are having the opposite problem!
|
|
|
|
|
Now that Pluto is a Dwarf Planet, does it get a +2 Endurance and automatic "Detect Hidden Doors"?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
You just rolled a 20 on your humor check! 
|
|
|
|
|
Watch it or I will get my BFG out.
Mongo: Mongo only pawn... in game of life.
|
|
|
|
|
Before it fires I'll have slaughtered you with the double barreled or the plasma gun!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I'll pacify your BFG with a snozzcumber sandwich[^]. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Sweet.
Mongo: Mongo only pawn... in game of life.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
Had a bit of a strange phone call telling me the link between Vodaphone & O2 and as such I was to be awarded with an upgrade, call goes on for a while before after agreeing to the conditions it turns out my mobile number was to be transferred to O2 and the company who called me were going to be billing me. So I stopped it there for a couple of reasons 1) I have loyal to Vodaphone for over 20 years, I have relations working there (in Newbury) 2) I did not want to run on the O2 network for security reasons (not that I have that much to be secure about) 3) I was a bit skeptical of a company I have never heard of billing me. Also the handset upgrade was not really an upgrade... Anyone else had this happen to them. Also the company I had the interview with want me back for another more indepth (can I work with this bozo test) next week  
|
|
|
|
|
glennPattonBackInThePUB wrote: Also the company I had the interview with want me back for another more indepth (can I work with this bozo test) next week
Wah Hay! Nice one!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
glennPattonBackInThePUB wrote: Had a bit of a strange phone call .... I was to be awarded ....
Can you smell what the bull is shitting? Hang up.
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.
|
|
|
|
|
glennPattonBackInThePUB wrote: Also the company I had the interview with want me back
Great news. Hopefully the list of posters will go back to being aligned properly and put my OCD to bed!
|
|
|
|
|
Shades of the late 80's and early 90's, when fly-by-night long distance carriers could hijack your service on the flimsiest of excuses without your consent.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Think about it..Microsoft is on a big PR campaign to get Win7/8.1 to upgrade to Win10...BUT Win 10
1 has a much longer boot than 7/8.1
2 has a "phase2 boot" (after the desktop displays it continues to spin the hard drive to complete the boot process)
3 is loaded with "junk" apps that can't be uninstalled (e.g. OneNote)
4 is no more secure than Win7/8.1
5 requires more 'updates' per month than 7/8.1
I have Win10, Win7 Pro and Win 8,1 installed on 3 identical PCs and Win 10 is the worst performing. As far as I'm concerned there a reason why the percentage of Win 7 installations is six times greater than Win 10 installs.
Win 10 IS the biggest Microsoft con job since Vista
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: there a reason why the percentage of Win 7 installations is six times greater than Win 10 installs
Yes there is: Win 7 has been around for 8 years!
I'm afraid the rest of your piece is a bunch of sweeping statements without substantiation.
By the way: My laptop boots in 6 seconds on Win 10. Win 8 was no better. In any case: You don't need a faster boot, do you?
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
Cornelius Henning wrote: You don't need a faster boot, do you?
I've got a 1TB SSD in my desk waiting for my birthday which is whispering "Yes. Yes you do. Go on. You know you want me..."
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: I've got a 1TB SSD in my desk
It's 960 GB 
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not going to quibble over 40GB! (That's only 4% and I'm only going to put about 100GB on it anyway! )
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: I'm not going to quibble over 40GB!
Had to laugh, I remember getting excited when I upgraded my 5mb drive to 20mb. true it was in the dark ages!
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Mycroft Holmes wrote: when I upgraded my 5mb drive to 20mb. true it was in the dark ages!
And I thought it was bad my first HD was 30Mb (and attached to an Atari ST).
|
|
|
|
|
You forgot
6 is ugly as heck compared with Win7
7 is still schizophrenic and doesn't feel "together" at all.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
The one thing I find "ugly" about 10, is that window borders are now only one pixel wide. But I find that setting a contrasting accent color makes the borders very visible. Other than that, what do you find ugly about 10? My desktop is as colorful as ever.
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
I've got coloured titles now, which helps, but compared to Win 7 it's very flat and dull - no transparency at all. And the "new" monochrome icons and suchlike look like they were thrown together by a dev as a placeholder before the art department came up with the real ones...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I suppose this is in line with user interfaces as dictated by Microsoft for "productivity apps". Yes, I must confess, their guidelines tend to be somewhat bland. 
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
That's why I upgraded to Windows 9.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
(disclaimer, my PC is not my primary machine, only a gaming machine; I boot it up, log in, go prepare dinner and after that, I play).
1 and 2 : (anecdotal) My experience is that Win10 loads up faster (to login screen), after that it continues to load up stuff slowly, but I think it is going in the right direction; boot time should be fast; secondary system can take up more time for all I care. What about waking it up from sleeping ? is is faster than win7/8?
- I don't really care about those on my PC (as much as I would on a portable device where storage is a lot more limited)
- Don't know about that; I only use Microsoft Security Essentials stuff.
- That's good, they are working on it and keeping things under control; I'd be pissed if they only released patches every couple of months.
Personally, I always thought Win8 was a botched job (bad understanding of the portable devices vs. desktop computers)
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
