|
Roy picks up phone: Hello IT, did you try turning it off and on again?
|
|
|
|
|
Exactly
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
The Da Vinci files?
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
No. That's 16th century stuff...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy.
Mongo: Mongo only pawn... in game of life.
|
|
|
|
|
Another 48 bugs
In Word you can only store 2 bytes. That is why I use Writer.
|
|
|
|
|
Rollerball (the original)
|
|
|
|
|
I was Browsing XKCD, clicking the Random button of course, and then i saw this one... I'm still not entirely sure if this is the best one or worst one I have ever seen...
https://goo.gl/HSdXhA[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I noticed this morning that my i7 laptop was emitting a loud fan noise like it was working on something.
I ignored it and went to work.
Now, returning home I noticed that the fan was still screaming so I looked at TaskManager and Android studio was eating 25% of total processor power. Ugh!
All day long, even though the laptop was closed and idle it was exercising the processor doing nothing.
IDE -- integrated dev environments. blech! 
|
|
|
|
|
Your lucky, try having it take 70%-90% cpu power and 60%-70% RAM.
IDE's aren't all bad, Visual Studio and Xcode are quite good actually. Android Studio is not any better or worse than Eclipse IMHO.
i cri evry tiem
|
|
|
|
|
James_Parsons wrote: Android Studio is not any better or worse than Eclipse IMHO.
I'd beg to differ, there is nothing worse than Eclipse... 
|
|
|
|
|
Albert Holguin wrote: there is nothing worse than Eclipse..
EDLIN?
No, no - you're right.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Quite a powerful tool once you got your ed round it.
We can’t stop here, this is bat country - Hunter S Thompson RIP
|
|
|
|
|
James_Parsons wrote: Android Studio is not any better or worse than Eclipse IMHO. Far worse on my system. It is so slow as to be unusable, whereas eclipse runs reasonably we;ll.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: et tu?! How do you translate ?
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
"Consumed a couple"
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
You get the monitor cleaning bill for the day. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single page apps are just annoying and horrible to use when the designer gets too smart.
Prosum[^]
I'm sure they're a great company but, please, rethink the design. It gives people a headache.
Why was I looking at it?
Someone there sent me an email asking me why I hadn't submitted my time sheet for last week. I've never heard of them before today!
|
|
|
|
|
R. Giskard Reventlov wrote: Someone there sent me an email asking me why I hadn't submitted my time sheet for last week
So submit one.
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Marois wrote: So submit one.
Trap! I suspect that this is just a spam by an agent trying to harvest emails for his database.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I get all sorts of odd emails asking for very specific things. I'm guessing it works occasionally since its different people doing it. New age corporate phishing.
|
|
|
|
|
And get paid. Ya! I like how you think.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
That web-site in Chrome Version 47.0.2526.73 beta-m (64-bit) displays a 1448 × 956 blurred image, and then ... does nothing for a long time before, finally, loading the un-blurred version of the photo.
A triumph of style over content ?
«I want to stay as close to the edge as I can without going over. Out on the edge you see all kinds of things you can't see from the center» Kurt Vonnegut.
|
|
|
|
|
BillWoodruff wrote: That web-site in Chrome Version 47.0.2526.73 beta-m (64-bit) displays a 1448 × 956 blurred image, and then ... does nothing for a long time before, finally, loading the un-blurred version of the photo. Unless that really takes minutes...
I wonder who makes such websites and who pays for it?
Certainly no one is testing it!
|
|
|
|