|
... today if I like to view a Video on YouTube, Google ask me to confirm this and that. Yep I have no Problem, in case this is to protect the Artist. But I have a big Problem if it is only to allow Google to collect Information about me.
I'm very happy that CP is not on this way!
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Can't say as I've has any problems with YouTube today so I'd imagine that this relates to the specific video. Are we talking adult content here?
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Are we talking adult content here?
Now this can be the reason if an ACDC Video "Back in Black" is restricted for adults...
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Why would CP settle for taking mere information from you ?
«I want to stay as close to the edge as I can without going over. Out on the edge you see all kinds of things you can't see from the center» Kurt Vonnegut.
|
|
|
|
|
Your question is formulated very condescending!
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Message Closed
modified 9-Nov-15 3:45am.
|
|
|
|
|
![Rose | [Rose]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
 and your message is?
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Umm, you didn't get the "them" part, did you ?
Cheers
KR
|
|
|
|
|
Not everyone around here is protecting the realm.
|
|
|
|
|
No, I'm stupid!
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
That's horrifying and awesome in one.
Thanks for protecting us all. The automatons are fired up and working nicely as a first line of defence, but we really do need you guys to take out the trash, so to speak.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
No need to thanks us! Kicking spammers on a Saturday is about all the fun I can bear these days. And - yes - I know I need to get a life 
How do we preserve the wisdom men will need,
when their violent passions are spent?
- The Lost Horizon
|
|
|
|
|
Those zombie fighters could take a lesson from the guy with the sword.
|
|
|
|
|
The API's look great and I love Visual Studio, but Microsoft seems to be pushing Windows 10 too much to consumers rather than developers. They have decent docs, but they still need work. The only cloud that seems to care anything about Windows and is Azure, but I have a love/hate relationship with them. I am still waiting for Android docs for the Mobile app service and Swift and UWP docs too. I just feel that Windows 10 and the UWP are going to fail like 8/8.1 Metro apps were good IMHO, but they didn't take off. What do y'all think should I develop fro UWP or no.
p.s. I run a small team that specializes in mobile application solutions if thats any help.
i cri evry tiem
|
|
|
|
|
|
Universal Windows Platform
i cri evry tiem
|
|
|
|
|
Ah. Will it run on OpenVMS? 
|
|
|
|
|
If the Windows 10 mobile share ever rises above a miniscule percentage, then, yes. 
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
No. I don't see the point. Develop for Android, for iOS, for Windows Desktop, for MacOS desktop, for Linux (choose your desktop), but UWP seems to be solving a problem that no one really has at present (other than Microsoft).
Sure, if Windows Mobile (which is really what UWP is) picks up market share then it would make sense to develop for it but, unless and until that very unlikely time, there doesn't seem to be much need for UWP as a development target.
UWP is funky cool but despite this it's still not a worthy or functional replacement for Windows Desktop app development as far as I can see and so with Windows Mobile being a bit player it just seems to me that UWP has no useful place.
P.S. Oh, and if UWP does ever take off such that it becomes the main way to develop for the Windows ecosystem, then watch out for it being cancelled or left to wither and die...
|
|
|
|
|
To throw my 2 cents in the pot: If wanted to make a windows cross device application, I would also consider doing a Web Application (HTML+JS). Then is runs on all your Windows devices (did last gen Zunes have web browsers?) PLUS other platforms.
Where UWP is aimed at cross device within Microsoft's world (cross-device). Web Applications can be cross-platform, be it some Apple device, Linux or Android, or the next big OS to come out.
Ofcouse depth of application always something to consider. For some, native application development or depth might be quicker better, fast, easier, then a Web application.
If you need some fact based reason - weight up the pros/cons of any list of solutions, and pick the one with the best weighting for you project and team.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, it kept crashing my MSVS so it is a no-go for me, at this time.
I thought it might be useful to write desktop applications that could be distributed through the windows store. Not sure if I got the wrong end of the stick. Maybe in a couple of iterations I'll re-visit, but for right now I'm waiting to see what happens. Really don't want to learn a whole other platform that becomes redundant in a couple of years time.
|
|
|
|
|
UWP is only the first step in the overall direction of full cross-platform development. As with WPF, Windows Universal (Metro) apps, Silverlight, and now UWP, XAML is the cornerstone for developing apps within the Windows universe. Note that Windows 10 is likely the last version of Windows that will exist. The cloud is coming. Still, there will be some form of OS on all of the devices that will exist. As UWP grows, it will be universal with Android and even iOS. While you can do XAML-based apps using Xamarin's tools, UWP will make it more cross-platform compatible so that you can write one code-base that will run on multiple devices from PCs, Macs, iPad, Droid tablets and phones, iPhones, Xbox, HoloLens, etc. Look beyond today as this is really the future.
Christopher Reed
"The oxen are slow, but the earth is patient."
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
