|
As he hasn't stated the number of letters how do you know ? Also it does fit 
We can’t stop here, this is bat country - Hunter S Thompson RIP
|
|
|
|
|
5 symbols, means 5 letters...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
CLOCK XD
although someone thought it aint gonna fit
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Someone's thought was right actually, and yours too.
It was a CLOCK basically but his dad named him as TIMER
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe WATCH
or TIMER
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, TIMER is the right answer.
Congo, you're up for 28th October Two K and Fifteen 
modified 27-Oct-15 6:58am.
|
|
|
|
|
Aren't you supposed to state the amount of letters ?
We can’t stop here, this is bat country - Hunter S Thompson RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Counting has come a bit out of fashion, hasn't it?
I just tried and it came out about fiveish.
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
|
|
|
|
|
I got 4.75 - but one of my fingers is a lot shorter than the others.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
No need for this kind of precision here.
4,75 looks kind of fiveish to me.
If I look at it out of the corner of my eye it definitely looks fiveish!
Cheers!
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
|
|
|
|
|
I don't have the time for that
We can’t stop here, this is bat country - Hunter S Thompson RIP
|
|
|
|
|
In FSOW:
Number of symbols in the clue = number of letters in the answer
So it's not necessary to mention the number of letters in FSOW, they say 
|
|
|
|
|
Not always OG had a strange one a while back that didn't - just saying
We can’t stop here, this is bat country - Hunter S Thompson RIP
|
|
|
|
|
If it ain't sheep OG does have some difficulty counting.
He even messes up whole numbers, which are inherently the easiest to use in counting. :P
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
|
|
|
|
|
That's totally Vader's TIE fighter from the original Star Wars... You know, that great trilogy for which they thankfully never made any more sequels...
|
|
|
|
|
... if I'm the project manager to be - why you force me to use a specific technology even before we started?! I'm quit...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
It's not the PM's roll to decide on the technology. The sole responsibility of the PM is to ensure that the project is delivered on time and to budget. It's not even their responsibility to ensure it works. The hardest part about a techie moving to being a PM is letting go of the technical side.
|
|
|
|
|
Granted - not PM decides on the technology (however in this case there is no development team jet, and it was expected of me to create one)...I had no objection to such statement from the development team, but it came from the owner...
I do not care if he has a thousand nephews just finished learning AngularJS on a five day course...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
There may be other considerations coming into play here that you aren't aware of. For instance, he may have license issues over a particular IDE/language combination or he might have a set of platforms planned later that you aren't aware of. Never assume that you know what factors the owner is weighing in.
|
|
|
|
|
IMHO, there is no way an owner should interfere with technology...
He has the request, the time-frame, the budget - the PM will look into it to make it done!
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Of course - but there again you probably have an understanding of information technology while the owner does not, try explaining that to the owner.
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
modified 27-Oct-15 4:54am.
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: the PM will look into it to make it done!
No. Which bit of that's not the PM's job caused problems? The PM should not be concerned about the technology stack - it's a common thing to have PM's who aren't technologists, but who have very good at organising, planning, budgeting, identifying risks, reporting, etc - all the things that are meant to remove the roadblocks and that are meant to keep the project on track. Frankly, when you're developing a system, there's nothing worse than a PM who continually butts in because they used to be a coder.
Yes, the PM may have an opinion and they may offer it, but they aren't there to enforce it or even to choose it. If you're going to do a PM role, you need to stop thinking like a developer and learn to take a much more strategic view. And yes, I speak from experience here - the hardest thing I ever had to learn to do was to hand over the coding reins to others.
|
|
|
|
|
We can’t stop here, this is bat country - Hunter S Thompson RIP
|
|
|
|
|
As I told. I do not want to hold the technology. All I want is to receive it from the right direction...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
And what do you consider the right direction to be?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
