|
I'm tempted to call it cheating! 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I only use it when im totally desperate  
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Hey, I honestly tried to find the solution from the pattern. But when I couldn't, I cheated. But if you look at the word, there's no way to get it from the pattern.
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
indeed, without any clue you could never ever get the solution
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Can one of you answer it then please?
|
|
|
|
|
Just because you said please: "Bookkeeper". 
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
Well done to your program 
|
|
|
|
|
Does that mean he has to write a program over the weekend to set the next one?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: he has to write a program over the weekend
Nah, that's a lot of work. I think I will just post a question in QA and ask for teh codez urgenzzly.
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
I didn't use it, and i wont, this is t crazy 
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
As a serious suggestion, the "Mastermind" scoring system did make it easier, and more of a game that it is at present. Perhaps it should be the standard, rather than needing a pattern matching program to find the solution?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I guess so, but since i don't know the mastermind rules i guess i can't update the rules
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Mastermind rules:
a correct character in the correct place: black
a correct character in the wrong place: white
Count and post and number of black and white.
|
|
|
|
|
Okay we will update this in the rules
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Already updated in the rules, will tell everyone on monday
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Lying bunch of sunshines.
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.
|
|
|
|
|
Generally (yes)?
Or specifically in one case you just noticed?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
A general thing triggered by a specific.
It is annoying that they are allowed to write things that are shown to be false if you read the story.
It is more annoying that so many people these days lack the attention span to read an actual article and just form their opinions from misleading adverts.
Just another way that news sites no longer try to inform, they just control or direct opinion.
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.
|
|
|
|
|
chriselst wrote: Just another way that news sites no longer try to inform, they just control or direct opinion.
No longer? When were news (sites / papers / whatever) ever unbiased?
|
|
|
|
|
They were always biased, but at least they pretended to be trying to inform, that is completely out of the window now with so many of them just making stuff up.
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.
|
|
|
|
|
chriselst wrote: It is annoying that they are allowed to write things that are shown to be false if you read the story.
Allowed? Who would prevent them? Surely you're not demanding that they actually read and understand the story before they add the headline? You'll be saying that illustrations on paperback books should have some resemblance to the content.[^] That way madness lies!
|
|
|
|
|
I can usually spot them a mile away from the headline - I then make it my duty to read the whole article just to see how far they have twisted it and how far down they actually report the truth. Anything on Jeremy Corbyn is a dead cert.
|
|
|
|
|
One think that makes it easier is when you identify certain sources where it's much more common. That way if you have a news source that you know tends to drop these headlines it's often enough that your BS senses are tingling and its true.
Or how this one site drops new in the morning that house prices is about to drop, the real estate market is slowing down and yadda yadda and then later that same day drops an article about how the market is hot, nothing shows any sign of slowing down and everything is going up up up. Contradiction much.
|
|
|
|
|
Easy One as I don't want to do 3 times in a row
Stealing Oil, breaking Law (11)
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
