|
Here[^]
Reality is they look too slippery and dangerous
|
|
|
|
|
That's OK - what I really wanted was a Mr Fusion!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I'd settle for a De Loren. A mechanically crap car but quite unique and cool
|
|
|
|
|
And with "white powder" ballast! 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
? Lost me a bit there. It that a reference to John DeLorean lifestyle?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I know someone who has a DeLorean. He takes it to country fairs to show it off. I was chatting to him one day about the car and he admitted that driving it terrifies him - if it's late on, he's so low down in the car that even dipped headlights look like high beams and when cars get relatively close, they look like Mack trucks in his rear view.
|
|
|
|
|
Reminds of an original mini I had. Everything round you twice the size and the drum brakes were pretty ineffectual.
|
|
|
|
|
I have the same problem with my car - I'd rather have a DeLorean though, mine is a Fiat Seicento 
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
"When you have eliminated the JavaScript, whatever remains must be an empty page." -- Mike Hankey
|
|
|
|
|
The most sad fact about this day is that i can't watch the Triology today 
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
I was bored of Back to the Future Day long before Back to the Future Day got here.
And all this excitement over a sh*t film too.
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.
|
|
|
|
|
I will be bored of Back of the Future four years ago!
Honestly I don't like it much
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
"When you have eliminated the JavaScript, whatever remains must be an empty page." -- Mike Hankey
|
|
|
|
|
From Visual Studio Magazine[^]
Stop trying to make everything work all at once. Instead, use Domain Events to make applications simpler, more scalable and easier to maintain -- and to defer updates until you can't avoid making them.
Very interesting (to me) ideas but I imagine a hard business case to sell to the less technically literate management. I guess I'll have to wait until it appears in the Harvard Business Review or some airline in-flight magazine 
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Very interesting (to me) ideas but I imagine a hard business case to sell to the less technically literate management.
We're in the very same boat. We've done a boatload of research into ES and CQRS and are confident it will solve some of the data related problems we're now experiencing. Selling this to management is the difficult part though.
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
I'm currently thinking (and this is controversial) that if I have my read model persist snapshots to a relational database the muggles won't realise that this isn't a traditional three tier system
|
|
|
|
|
Duncan Edwards Jones wrote: the muggles won't realise that this isn't a traditional three tier system
Traditional? I'm still fighting against endless quantities of 'big ball of mud' code and the muggles in charge are still very sceptical of this new three tier stuff.
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: new three tier stuff.
Isn't that some kind of oxymoron? 3-tier has been around for ages and isn't new.
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
Those suits have been around for ages as well and to them everything that came after Access is new.
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.
|
|
|
|
|
Although many of the examples use NoSql type databases for ES, it is perfectly possible to use a relational database.
Dino Esposito is making a big effort to bring ES and CQRS into the mainstream by showing how it can be implemented using tools most development shops already have, and this is where I have begun my own exploration
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
After numerous bug fixes our systems will become consistent, eventually
|
|
|
|
|
consistent != bugfree
|
|
|
|
|
And a bugged app could crash consistently.
I know, the two have nothing in common... 
|
|
|
|
|
So in other words, my application will eventually work?
Honestly, is "domain events" just a fancier word for messaging across domains? It seems not. Moving along...
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
In other words the data in my read model will eventually be consistent to the updates applied through the write model. This is also what happens in a database only in that case the caller is forced to wait until "eventually" becomes now.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
