|
I think you should be very proud of your humility!
|
|
|
|
|
But **doesn't** it make you feel good about yourself? it does me!
PooperPig - Coming Soon
|
|
|
|
|
Actually no. It depresses me that I didn't do more.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't give money, but I give of my time by being involved, which is - to my eyes - highly valuable, especially since lots of time is involved.
Of course, money is needed, so if everybody would reason that way, it could not work either.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: My 'philosophy' is that I don't give to any cause (charitable, begging, etc.) that asks for it (so please stop phoning me, Guide Dogs for the Blind!) but I do support various charities, ad try once in a while to perform RAKs.
I basically do the same.
|
|
|
|
|
I always let people pull out when I am driving.
Not only is this a nice thing to do for those people, but it really enrages Audi drivers if you are lucky enough to have one behind you.
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.
|
|
|
|
|
A pair of RAKs, a random act of kindness and a random act of karma in a single act, now that's efficient!
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: who got picked up by Dad on his way past in his Mercedes each day. They earned more than I did.
That made me think of the incident that made stop giving to people in the street, in Spain on Holiday one year there was a 'single' Mum sitting near a cash point looking pathetic, so most people walking past would give a few euros (me inclued). This was fine until later in the day I was in said bank and got a tap on the shoulder from a friend there was 'single mum' paying in to the bank the money we had all given! 
|
|
|
|
|
from the Phaedrus (circa 370 BCE): 'additions' in italics
I heard, then, that at Naucratis, in Egypt, was one of the ancient gods of that country, the one whose sacred bird is called the ibis, and the name of the god himself was Theuth. He it was who invented numbers and arithmetic and geometry and astronomy, also draughts and dice, and, most important of all, letters the internet.
Now the king of all Egypt at that time was the god Thamus, who lived in a great city of the upper region, which the Greeks call the Egyptian Thebes, and they call the god himself Ammon. To him came Theuth to show his inventions, saying that they ought to be imparted to the other Egyptians.
But Thamus asked what use there was in each, and as Theuth enumerated their uses, expressed praise or blame of the various arts which it would take too long to repeat; but when they came to letters the internet:
'This invention, O king,' said Theuth, 'will make the Egyptians wiser and will improve their memories; for it is an elixir of memory and wisdom that I have discovered.'
But Thamus replied, 'Most ingenious Theuth, one man has the ability to beget arts, but the ability to judge of their use fulness or harmfulness to their users belongs to another; and now you, who are the father of letters, the internet have been led by your affection to ascribe to them a power the opposite of that which they really possess.
For this invention will produce forgctfulness in the minds of those who learn to use it, because they will not practise their memory.
Their trust in writing search engines, produced by external characters rapacious companies who do not give an obol for privacy which are not part of themselves they have no control over will discourage the use of their own memory within them.
You have invented an elixir not of memory but of reminding; and you offer your pupils the appearance of wisdom, not true wisdom, for they will read many things without instruction and will therefore seem to know many things, when they are for the most part ignorant and hard to get along with, since they are not wise, but only appear wise."
«I want to stay as close to the edge as I can without going over. Out on the edge you see all kinds of things you can't see from the center» Kurt Vonnegut.
|
|
|
|
|
There is a stunning and irrefutable proof of the fallacy of this conclusion ... if I could only remember what it is!
|
|
|
|
|
I know the proof, but the margin is to small...
PooperPig - Coming Soon
|
|
|
|
|
Ask in QA!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Where's the nearest mens room?
|
|
|
|
|
Google says it's just over there.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
BillWoodruff wrote: You have invented an elixir not of memory but of reminding; and you offer your pupils the appearance of wisdom, not true wisdom, for they will read many things without instruction and will therefore seem to know many things, when they are for the most part ignorant and hard to get along with, since they are not wise, but only appear wise."
I can confirm that. I just started my day's work in the place where such people are produced.
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.
|
|
|
|
|
Concepts over notions, that's the key. Remembering all the win32 APIs is feasible, only to have the knowledge useless under a POSIX system. Remember the concepts and discard the details... else you become useless after several years.
Geek code v 3.12 {
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
}
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
|
|
|
|
|
den2k88 wrote: Remember the concepts and discard the details... else you become useless after several years.
When talking with young colleagues nowadays, that doesn't hold up: When they introduce the details of that super-great modelling tool, or documentation tool, or project management method, and you nod and say "Yes, that's the concept of xxx", they say "Huh? Never heard of that xxx! This is something completely new, and a lot better than all that old garbage!"
The only way to communicate easily with young people is to learn the details about their new, fantastic tools, methods, techniques, and keep quiet about the seven earlier realizations of that concept you have been working with. If you have to refer to any of the earlier ones, or to the conceptual side of it, always remember to wrap it up as some old fairy tale of the old days that have no real relevance to the modern world.
|
|
|
|
|
That I don't know: in Italy we use (very) old tools and we are taught all the basic techniques in University... all the new toys are explored in the last two years, after having passed several programming exams held with pen, paper and carbon paper (to have a copy that must be corrected within a deadline to have the exam evaluated, otherwise it is discarded).
One thing our professors say to us is that in many Universities they prepare much better for the job market - the current job market, that will be different in 5 years, while learning from the basics and the historical solutions one is better equipped to update his knowledge.
From this my methodology: abstract to the concepts, compact them in classes, remember only the differences. All the relevant documentation is saved (I do not rely on the same document to be there in the same palce unotuched) and kept accessible and organized.
I guess it's just a frame of mind...
Geek code v 3.12 {
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
}
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
|
|
|
|
|
Something that drives me nuts - since when does Ctrl-B or any other non traditional clipboard key combination clear out the clipboard buffer?!?
Note to the young lads at MS: CTRL-B (or other ctrl+<key> should not be emptying out or clearing the clipboard CF_TEXT in the buffer.....
modified 17-Sep-15 18:14pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because I'm not sure if I'm reading maths homework or if I'm accidentally opening a demon gate from hell.
I recently came across this formula (scribbled on an ancient scroll and only readable by full moon):
F(x) = P(X <= x) = Σ P(X = y) = Σ P(X = y) + P(X = x) = F(x - 1) + P(X = x)
y<=x y<=x-1The worst part is they continue with "of course this makes perfect sense."
I've seen worse, but I'm afraid my computer will spontaneously combust if I try to type it (for which I don't have the time in this short, mortal life).
This is why I can't have good grades 
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, let's see...
F(x) = P(X, which is <= x)
P(X) = The sum of P(y), for all y <= x... Wait...
Yeah, this is why I always hated all of those advanced math courses...
|
|
|
|
|
Ian Shlasko wrote: advanced math courses
This is first year... 
|
|
|
|
|
Well it's still gibberish...
I mean, I see what it's saying... It's just saying it in a silly way...
F(x) is the sum of P(1)..P(x)
Therefore, F(x) = F(x-1) + P(x)
It's defining F(x) recursively...
I just hate how they reduce every variable to one letter, and use uppercase AND lowercase as separate values... It's just too hard to read.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
