|
That's from something like 'If programming languages were cars' article which was among the news here a while ago. But I find it fitting. A golf cart is just as much a car as JavaScript is a programming language.
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.
|
|
|
|
|
Ironically, I like JavaScript a lot. However, I tend to hear a lot of people act like it's the answer to cancer these days and it makes me laugh. Some of the people where are work are comparing to Assembly in terms of speed for instance because of libs like asm.js[^]. And yet, it's still a script. Not sure why people don't get that.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
I really don't like any functional languages, but that's just my personal preference. I think they are not easy to debug and at some point it always becomes hard to determine, wether or not this mess of code and data in a variable is correct or not.
As an interpreter, it's not only slow, but also notices errors only at runtime. Since the parser can get out of step after a typo, you must not only test whatever you changed, but also everything that comes after it. I really prefer to have a compiler filter out this kind of stuff before anything runs.
And a performance like assembly? Laughable. How can an interpreter which has to parse and interpret every line each time it is encountered ever hope to come close to the native machine code? Such nonsense can only be claimed by people who have never tried or understood what assembly or machine code are all about. Even in the old days some people never really understood the overhead involved with parsing, interpreting and then executing a single line of a higher level language.
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.
|
|
|
|
|
CDP1802 wrote: And a performance like assembly? Laughable. How can an interpreter which has to parse and interpret every line each time it is encountered ever hope to come close to the native machine code? Such nonsense can only be claimed by people who have never tried or understood what assembly or machine code are all about. Even in the old days some people never really understood the overhead involved with parsing, interpreting and then executing a single line of a higher level language.
It can't. That's why I laugh at such hyped-up claims. Script kiddies these days. 
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
During my studies, the professor started the first lecture about assembly programming with claiming that compilers 'nowadays' do a better job than the average assembly programmer. I made a comment about not comparing myself to the average and he thought that I was a bit arrogant. Later we had many interesting talks, after he heard that I had about 18 years experience of machine code and assembly programming at that time.
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.
|
|
|
|
|
You guys don't seem to understand how modern javascript interpreters work.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, that must be it. Do you really think they did not try to get their good old BASIC interpreters to perform a little better 35 years ago when memory and CPU were a little more limited than now? Your 'modern´interpreters are just as wasteful and a pain to work with as the old ones and no optimization short of turning them into compilers will make it any better.
Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.
|
|
|
|
|
Well it's not that he's not funny, it's just that the joke is buried so deep, nobody can find it (or at least, I usually can't)
Bill Watterson was usually funny. I recall that almost every single one was. I wish he had kept on drawing Calvin & Hobbes.
|
|
|
|
|
Today's xkcd requires one to be familiar with this movie, They Live[^]. I found today's drawing quite funny, but that's just my odd sense of humor.
"...JavaScript could teach Dyson how to suck." -- Nagy Vilmos
|
|
|
|
|
Back in school, we'd call it "The Emperor's New Clothes".
|
|
|
|
|
I thought it to be a reference to Duke Nukem but if it's not i still think its funny 
But in general you are right
Rules for the FOSW ![ ^]
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
I don't like CommitStrip either but people post that "comic" here all the time.
Dilbert is great, the rest I don't care for.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
The problem about Dilbert is that it often lags behind reality. I have known managers that make pointy hair look like a model of sanity and practical thinking.
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.
|
|
|
|
|
The comic is a tribute to Rowdy Roddy Piper...
The United States invariably does the right thing, after having exhausted every other alternative. -Winston Churchill
America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between. -Oscar Wilde
Wow, even the French showed a little more spine than that before they got their sh*t pushed in.[^] -Colin Mullikin
|
|
|
|
|
Well, at least there's two of us who got it  .
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Doctor, doctor, it hurts when I do this.
Well don't do it then!
|
|
|
|
|
It's not always intended to be funny, per se. Sometimes the intent, at least what I get from it, is to make one stop and think, or appreciate something a little more. He also from time to time just pays tribute to someone or something that is important to him.
Many are a visual, math or other pun, and can take some thought to "get", and while I'll freely admit I don't always get what he's trying to say, I still read it every day. 
Currently reading: "The Prince", by Nicolo Machiavelli
|
|
|
|
|
Can you send the link to XKCD cartoon you mentioned? It's already tomorrow here (Sydney) and I don't think "today's" comic (http://xkcd.com/1561/) needs a PhD. Btw, and on topic, http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/ is well worth a read if you've never seen it. Bill has been analysing obscure comics online since 1997.
|
|
|
|
|
I wish you would specifically reference which one you are talking about and then we could explain it to you.
|
|
|
|
|
I regularly find them quite funny, on occasion they are even hilarious.
|
|
|
|
|
http://xkcd.com/ wrote: Warning: this comic occasionally contains strong language (which may be unsuitable for children), unusual humor (which may be unsuitable for adults), and advanced mathematics (which may be unsuitable for liberal-arts majors).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Its like most jokes.. if you don't have the background, its not funny.
The water phase diagram is hilarious.. except he missed the supercritical fluid/Simon Cowell regions. And I'm still trying to figure where ice 9 and polywater fit (probably next to the polly-want-a-cracker region).
And no, you don't need a PhD, just a good basis in science for that one.
We can program with only 1's, but if all you've got are zeros, you've got nothing.
|
|
|
|
|
I love XKCD!
There, I said it.
I love XKCD because it's so intensely geeky. If not everybody gets the joke, that's ok. I love XKCD because unlike 99% of the internet, it's not about lolcats, Justin Bieber, or how drunk somebody got last friday. People who don't get XKCD should go watch Nyan Cat on youtube. OK Nyan Cat isn't funny, but maybe the suggested links will be.
Please don't ruin the tiny remaining piece of the internet that is funny to the kind of people who built the internet, rather than the kind of people who spend their lives on it now.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
