|
|
Hardcover from $360! 
And I thought computer manuals were expensive!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Still cheap if you consider the cost of the related hardware...
|
|
|
|
|
I want the plane
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
|
|
|
|
|
You can't afford the running costs! 1 ton of fuel every minute...and a full tank is 80,000 gallons, most of which is loaded in mid air after takeoff. 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Pocket change
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
|
|
|
|
|
Good. There is also a tiny bit of maintainance after each flight...
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Marois wrote: Pocket change
Good! you can spare some then. [hand fully extended] 
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: a full tank is 80,000 gallons,
80,000 gallons? 80,000 pounds of fuel I would believe (based on the unloaded/loaded weights in the SR-71[^] article on wikipedia).
Yes, I'm being pedantic. It's been that kind of week.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
You're right - brain failure on my part...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I took a rough stab at the math, using 800 kg/m3 as the density of JP-7 fuel. It comes out to around 12,000 gallons, assuming I haven't dropped a decimal anywhere.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Good idea, now that they retired, I could put it in my paddock with my old tractor I have in the garden. 
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Marois wrote: I want the plane
Plane is free with the book 
|
|
|
|
|
Excellent read! Thanks.
I just noticed for the first time that the engine nacelles have a slight inboard curve to them, probably to match the airflow.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
I've added this question to the Web Development forum but it was suggested I add a plea into the lounge also. I'd appreciate the help - the link and question are below!
Link: http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/5102431/How-do-you-deal-with-Japanese-Asian-languages-in-r.aspx[^]
"This is something I have come up against recently and that is dealing with the Japanese language in responsive web applications. Changing the formation of a sentence can change the entire context or meaning. How do we deal with this - if a sentence is too long for a field and spills onto the next line?
Is there anywhere I can read up on how this is handled? Any information would be appreciated!
Example
私は、コードが好き = I , like the code
私は、コードが好
き = I , code is good
Can"
Simon Lee Shugar (Software Developer)
www.simonshugar.co.uk
"If something goes by a false name, would it mean that thing is fake? False by nature?" By Gilbert Durandil
|
|
|
|
|
Without a specific question I cannot give a specific answer and keep in mind I've only studied Japanese for a few months, but your issue has nothing to do with a different language... a different font would give you the same issue. Perhaps even a different text size (for the visually impaired) would give you this problem as well.
There's no one exact answer, except to remember one core, fundamental of design philosophy between print and the web. The web is live and fluid. Print is not. So in other words you need to design your page in such as way to work in more than one scenario.
If for whatever reason, you switch languages and it causes a line wrap in one language where in English there was none, then your UI layout needs to handle it. In the case where this is not acceptable, then consider having one layout for one language and another for a different language.
http://www.nomensa.com/blog/2010/7-tips-and-techniques-for-multi-lingual-website-accessibility[^]
Points 6 and 7 in that link talk about this a bit more.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also, here is a Bootstrap website supporting more than one language to help get your motor running..
http://en.houbovypark.cz/[^]
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the help I'll have a look into it. I was wondering if the Japanese language used certain characters to symbolise a block of characters that must be read together. The web is an interesting weave indeed.
Simon Lee Shugar (Software Developer)
www.simonshugar.co.uk
"If something goes by a false name, would it mean that thing is fake? False by nature?" By Gilbert Durandil
|
|
|
|
|
It does, but this generally only happens in katakana/hiragana, not kanji. For example, a small 'tsu' indicates a long consonant. And, the presence of 'u' after anything that ends with 'o' (like 'to' or 'ko') indicates a long 'o'. The same goes for an 'i' after anything that ends with 'e'. I can't put down the exact letters here, but I'm sure you'll be able to find many sources for katakana/hiragana online.
That said, I've never seen any split-up words in any Japanese texts I've seen (admittedly, they're mostly games and manga  ), and there are cases where two or more words are joined together to provide context. So if you're looking for a way to split words up, my suggestion is don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Blocks of kanji that should be read together as a single word are quite common, actually. It's similar to how we string together Greek and Latin roots to make new words. For example: Locomotive = 機関車
|
|
|
|
|
Indeed they are. I really meant to say syllables. In most cases, kanji letters, when strung together, act as a single syllable. For example, the kanji for 'person' could be read 'hito' when standalone, or 'jin' when it's a part of a word. However, in most cases, they're standalone syllables, unlike (for example) 'ho' + 'u', which is read 'hoo' (long 'o').
At least that is what I know. I don't have much formal training when it comes to Japanese. I mostly learn it out of self interest.
|
|
|
|
|
I think you actually mean katakana, not kanji.
Japanese use two phonetic character sets: katakana and hiragana. Historically, hiragana was used by women and katakana was used by men, and you can still see that history in the characters themselves. Hiragana tend to be more round and have loops, while katakana tend to be more angular. In modern usage, hiragana is used for native Japanese words and katakana is used for foreign words.
Kanji are Chinese characters, and each is a word in itself, representing a distinct concept. They are not used as syllables, because that's what katakana and hiragana were created for. When kanji are strung together it is to merge the concepts together to describe a new thing that can't be described adequately by any existing single character (again, just like we do with Greek and Latin roots).
All the characters in both katakana and hiragana were derived from kanji that have the same pronunciation, and most (possibly all?) retain the meaning of the original kanji, even though that's not typically how they're used.
It's pretty common to see kanji and hiragana together, and there are two general cases. First, small hiragana are sometimes placed above or below a kanji character as a pronunciation guide, called furigana, because children are generally taught hiragana first and gradually introduced to kanji as they get older. Second, hiragana are often added to the end of a kanji word (one or more characters) to indicate verb conjugation, because Japanese has verb tenses and Mandarin (which kanji were actually created for) does not.
Anyway, I hope I didn't go too overboard there. I actually do have some formal training in both Chinese and Japanese. Not enough to claim even moderate fluency, sadly, but enough to understand how the writing systems work.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, sorry. I meant one kanji letter is usually one syllable, though is some cases, it could be more than one (like the kanji for mountain in 'Fujiyama'). Like I said in my original post, katakana/hiragana in many cases require more than one letter to produce a syllable.
When I said 'syllable', it's from the perspective of someone who's used to Latin alphabet, thus 'yama' is two syllables, though it's written with one kanji. And 'he + i' (which is read 'hee' with a long 'e') is a single syllable, though it's written with two hiraganas. So what I'm trying to say is, while you could split words consisting only of kanji into two lines with ease, that migh not be the case with words containing horagana/katakana, due to that reason, as it might confuse the reader. Or at least makes it harder for them to read.
Now, I don't know what kind of provision the Japanese language has for dealing with word splitting for line breaks, but personally, I've never seen any split words in the texts (*cough*manga*cough*) I've read. I don't know about websites though.
|
|
|
|
|
If katakana/hiragana are present in typed Japanese there will also be spaces. There might not be if it's pure kanji, but anyone who can read that is already having to figure out a lot from context (verb tense, etc) so putting a line break in the wrong spot is not likely to increase their cognitive load significantly.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
