|
Firstly turn on switch1 for 1 minute, after 1 minute turn off the switch1, then turn on the switch2.
go to the room and check the cases:
case1: If bulb is on then switch2 is default switch.
case2: Touch bulb by your hand if it is warm then switch1 is default switch.
case3: If bulb is cold/normal then switch3 is default switch.
default: No switch is working.
|
|
|
|
|
It's an analog solution, don't think in digital terms...unless you are well-versed in three-state logic.
And yes the solution will work with CFL or LED bulbs, none of them are 100% efficient.
|
|
|
|
|
|
That was one of the three questions I was asked during an interview with a firm in Westlake Village. I got the job, so I guess I gave the answer that they wanted. Really, it's about common sense. The other question was to solve an equation for variables. It was perhaps solvable or not, but if you experimented by putting in some values, you figured out that any variables where y was x*2 and z was x*3 would work.
I thought they were good tests. Common sense and problem solving.
|
|
|
|
|
Okay,
I had to think threw it a bit.
Of course, my first reaction to the solution was my father yelling at me!
And the hint is that you have to change 1 inspection to inspect for 2 potential details,
to overcome the 3:1 input:output problem
Nice puzzle
|
|
|
|
|
correct answer assuming all the switches are in the OFF position to begin with is, since you only can make one trip and you dont know which one it is. You turn them ALL on, and then can go. This is a waste of electricity but NOT a waste of time. so depending on the time frame, you can play with switches and guess/deduce with one it "probably" is but ....
turning them ALL on, solves the puzzle.
|
|
|
|
|
Had this question at a job interview. It's a lateral thinking exercise. My experience with software development over 35 years is that lateral thinking is virtually never a part of the mental toolkit for software development.
Oh, by the way, the solution requires that the bulb be an incandescent bulb. It won't work with an LED bulb or electroluminescent night light.
|
|
|
|
|
What if you have an LED bulb in in the attic?
|
|
|
|
|
Here's my problem with the accepted solution -- How do you know that these aren't 3-way switches??
"One of them controls the lamp in the attic" -- which says nothing about whether the other two switches also control the lamp in the attic.
|
|
|
|
|
Usually up is on such as decora, or the old switches were marked on and off.
Or take off the panel, and use a current meter to determine the on position, or volt meter or test light.
Turn all 3 switches on.
|
|
|
|
|
Its so simple.. you turn ON ALL switches
|
|
|
|
|
I'd say I'll use logic gates for this one. Not sure if it will be valid, don't care either if it is or not. 
Say we are talking about OR gates, we can have a single switch be turned differently from the other two switches. We will then have 1+0+0=1 or 1+1+0=1. Then the lamp is on.
|
|
|
|
|
Assuming the bulb is incandescent and the switches are 1 -2 - 3
turn on switches 1 and 3 - wait 10 minutes - turn off switch three
go to the attic - if the light is on, switch one activates the lamp
if the light is off, feel the bulb
if it is warm, switch 3 activates the lamp
if it is cold, switch 2 activates the lamp.
SushiSlayer
|
|
|
|
|
I got that in less than a minute a few years back. 
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't looked at the other posts yet, so I'm throwing my solution in before I go reading.
Turn on the first switch.
Wait a while.
Turn off the first switch.
Turn on the second switch.
Go upstairs.
If the light is on, it's the second switch.
If the light off, feel the bulb.
If it's hot, it's the first switch, otherwise it's the third switch.
|
|
|
|
|
I attempted to prove the solution is viable but in the attempt I broke my ankle stumbling over all the junk in the pitch black attic as I tried to get to the light. 
>>> Mental note: Only attempt this during the daytime and only for attics with windows <<<
- Kelly
|
|
|
|
|
"...but you need to come into our office to work."
Huh? 
Something I hear oh so many times on the phone these days.
|
|
|
|
|
I work from home full-time now. My company's HQ is in another state.
I never have worked for a company that wants you in the office, and telecommuting was alright. It was one or the other, for me.
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe they ask you to come to the office once per week (or something like that).
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
I worked for a company like that once.
What it means is you work in their office. When you think you are on vacation, you get to telecommute instead. When you think you are at home for the night and winding down for the day, it means they will call you at home for the daily emergency (sometimes they forget they already had the emergency and call you 3 or four times during the night).
|
|
|
|
|
You mean at Apple Corp
|
|
|
|
|
I'm on the Farcebook homepage.
Just one click away from creating an account.
I'm about to give up my beliefs for a bit of social engagement.
So... Should I? 
|
|
|
|
|
NO!!!!!!!!!!
Contrary to popular belief, nobody owes you anything.
|
|
|
|
|
Yup.
Personally I think it's retarded, but only because it's a poor excuse for social interaction and filled with narcissistic people that post crap for attention. That being said, you should give it a whirl so you can see what the fuss is about and decide for yourself. Just don't be one of those peeps that thinks it's more important than real life though.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
I've been putting this off for years, even when my best friend said I should definitely take FB...
Guess you're right 
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
