|
Yes, I was also frustrated when I heard the news. There is no backwards compatibility so all the v1 apps will need a rewrite for v2.
no wonder why enterprises will not use any Google products. They do the same with Android also, every version has completely new UI.
But V2 is not ready yet, and when it will be ready it will not work on older browsers. Also they are going to support v 1, currently they have planned until v 1.6.
Angular saves so much development time, that even a rewrite after 6-8 months is OK in my case. (Few days to learn the framework and then few weeks to develop the front end.) I need the minimum viable product ready before the end of this month, so Angular and Web API are the only options.
|
|
|
|
|
I rather applaud the Angular team for their bravery.
Better a much improved product without backward compatibility than some mish-mash.
And given the speed of change, in 2 years nobody will remember the old days
PooperPig - Coming Soon
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome back, and thanks for this thoughtful high-altitude fly-by of Angular.
cheers, Bill
«To kill an error's as good a service, sometimes better than, establishing new truth or fact.» Charles Darwin in "Prospero's Precepts"
|
|
|
|
|
|
... about the messages I have posted here in CP forums so far and their measure of futility usefulness.
total Debator points (7562) / total messages (989) = 7.65 points/message
Not bad, is it? If fact that number is greater than that of Mr. Maunder (6.25).
My messages were quite dazzling then, weren't they?
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
Agent__007 wrote: My messages were quite dazzling then, weren't they? In fact - I have to recuperate from each one of them.. 
|
|
|
|
|
P/m is not a measure of usefulness: DD has 8.7 on that scale, and most of those were posted when he was drunk!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: P/m is not a measure of usefulness Yeah I know. That was just a thought came to my malevolent mind.
But DD has posted 43,354 messages!!! I don't think anyone has more than or is even near to that number.
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have got nothing to say.
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
To be fair, most of them are probably titled "Why X sucks today"
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Agent__007 wrote: I don't think anyone has more than or is even near to that number.
I don't think many people care, either; at least I hope not. 
|
|
|
|
|
Oh
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
they
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
do!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Not
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
me,
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
obviously...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
|
So I was thinking about your thinking.
You've only a single data point - no trending information whatsoever.
I heartily suggest you take that ratio at least one each day, enter said ratios into a spreadsheet and thereby monitor you progress. Your best days may have already passed you by.
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Better to record the date, and each individual rep point setting in the spreadsheet - you can calculate the ratio from that very simply, and you get greater flexibility in future.
If you're a bit OCD or AR, that is!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
But that may not be scalable enough, so it's better to move it to an object model, using factories and interfaces to implement important things like users and MessagePointRatio objects.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
We never thought that you are going to brag about the upvotes that we gave to you.
You should be grateful.
|
|
|
|
|
I get 9.025/message, which categorically proves, without a shadow of a doubt, then this is not in any way a measure of usefulness*.
* Biologically and spiritually notwithstanding, as laughter is good both for the health and for the the soul.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
It seems too quiet here. Almost 17.5 hours and no new post?! Just W-O-W!!
Anyway, here's a simple one:
There's a warmness in the atmosphere (4)
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|