|
|
RyanDev wrote: intelligent beings
think for themselves and make their own choices rather than blindly following the pack.
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: think for themselves and make their own choices rather than blindly following the pack.
Amen. 
Although, blindly following my parents when they potty trained me turned out to be a good idea. 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
RyanDev wrote: turned out to be a good idea
For them.
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: For them.
We all won. 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
But are you now unable to pooh in the woods? Are you able to adjust your behaviour to the circumstances?
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: But are you now unable to pooh in the woods? Are you able to adjust your behaviour to the circumstances?
With all of these questions I'm afraid you're about to ask for pictures. I think the Lounge has had enough of this topic. 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Is your wife's name katrina?
.'\ /`.
.'.-.`-'.-.`.
..._: .-. .-. :_...
.' '-.(o ) (o ).-' `.
: _ _ _`~(_)~`_ _ _ :
: /: ' .-=_ _=-. ` ;\ :
: :|-.._ ' ` _..-|: :
: `:| |`:-:-.-:-:'| |:' :
`. `.| | | | | | |.' .'
`. `-:_| | |_:-' .'
`-._ ```` _.-'
``-------'/xml>
|
|
|
|
|
Probably not so hot and wet as Katrina. 
|
|
|
|
|
pleiades[^]
Hopefully not a Leslie. Pretty neat.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Very cool, Marc. Thanks for sharing this.
|
|
|
|
|
Cool video, thanks for sharing
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
It appears that the light show was purely video. For the next level, have real-time image recognition, and adjust the lights according to the body positions (i.e., center the lights on the hands or feet, and minimally adjust their trajectories and/or accelerations when it is appropriate). That would put it way over the top of its current greatness. And make a great article worthy of a '5'!
|
|
|
|
|
The below YouTube post got me thinking, after years of defending PHP on CP, I will admit there is one thing that I think is utterly stupid about it - it doesn't support unsigned integers. And you can't specify which size of an integer you want. It's a 32-bit int on 32-bit systems and a 64-bit int on 64-bit systems. Period. End of story. You want something else, that's your problem. Deal with it.
Almost makes me wonder if that's why YT had the signed counter in the first place, for compatibility with web technologies such as that.
And PHP is still a great tool, but like most environments there are some WTF things about it. This is one of them.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
:cough: Perl :cough:
 Really a comment on "scripting languages" in general that provide simplicity at the cost of features. Serious programs require a rich set of datatypes and therefore strong typing.
|
|
|
|
|
That's just it, PHP started off as a scripting language, it's no longer one. You can use it that way if you want, but it's not required. It's no different than Java or .NET now in the fact you can pre-compile into bytecode and run that. You can even package modules into PHAR files that work very similar to assemblies.
PHP is growing up, but I'd wager most of its "scriptness" feel is due to legacy support. And your right, it still has that "scriptness" feel to it because you don't see it compiling in your IDE, that happens on the server behind the scenes.
For me, PHP's strength is the ungodly amount of things you can do with it. And it runs on Unix/Linux. It's faster than other *nix alternatives that I know of (RoR = slow), and beats writing a web app in C/C++. So, hopefully we'll get some of those missing goodies one day... oh unsigned ints.
Oh, and PHP does have type support. Just not strong typing. That's not the same as no typing.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Jeremy Falcon wrote: It's faster than other *nix alternatives that I know of (RoR = slow), and beats writing a web app in C/C++
Why is it that it seems so few *Nix web devs talk about JSP? JSP seems like the *real alternative to ASP.NET (instead of PHP) and yet you rarely hear much about it.
Is it because of the Apache (tomcat, glassfish, whatever) configuration that goes along with it?
Just curious.
|
|
|
|
|
I can't speak for everyone, but my path never took me down the JSP / J2EE road. I've been doing web development before JSP existed, and back in the mid 90s the only time I even cared about Java was for writing applets for my web pages. Never went too far with it back then since its UI library at the time was just slow (Swing I think it was). So, I stayed away from it. 20 years later I'm sure it's a different ballgame though, especially since JSP wouldn't even need a UI library.
That's also the reason I use PHP. PHP is the grandfather of it all. It's what was available when I got into web dev, and it was a great tool. Even before classic ASP came to be and still even after ASP was out there, the difference between classic ASP and PHP was night and day. PHP beat it in every way possible since classic ASP was really just six objects and VBScript or JScript. So, I stayed with PHP.
When JSP and even Cold Fusion started hitting the scene I had no reason to use it since I've been using PHP for years I didn't see a point in learning something new. I ended up doing a fair amount of ASP.NET for my job, but after years of PHP development I know how to work that stinking thing all kinds of weird ways to get some really awesome things out of it. So in short, I don't have a reason enough to justify taking the time to learn JSP / J2EE.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can't check the link as it's blocked at work. Bummer.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
That's the one thing you don't like about it? 
|
|
|
|
|
One of the quirks, yeah. The PHP logo is ugly too. But I can live with that. I've been using PHP since the late 90s, it's not nearly as bad some people think it is. The development of it is slower than say what MS or Oracle can do, but all things considered it's still a nice piece of software. A bit like the VB of the web world, where it's more a function of the programmer than the language making things with it that suck.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
The three really irritating things about php are the -> arrows and dollar signs, the completely random api methods, and using . for string concatenation. I really like wordpress which is built on php, the way double quote strings work, and the loose typing. Everything so far seems like a wash.
|
|
|
|
|
I've defended these points so many times I'm tired of repeating myself. These aren't real reasons; they're religious-type reasons man. It only tells me you don't know much about PHP. And yes, I *could* iterate each reason and explain it. I just don't feel like it. Muwahahaha.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Jeremy Falcon wrote: These aren't real reasons; they're religious-type reasons man.
Please, don't tell me how to think. I'm going to dislike PHP for that stuff no matter what you say, you don't have to defend it. I still use it and build some pretty cool software with it.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
