|
#2. And only critical updates, thank you. 
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Might be a good suggestion for a poll.
2
|
|
|
|
|
I have never had one problem with a Microsoft update. I have them update critical fixes automatically and I control the rest.
...knock on wood. 
|
|
|
|
|
I recently encountered a case where an entire week was lost because M$oft neglected to consider the new H97 motherboards with isolated graphics adapters in one of their updates. A new driver from the video card manufacturer revealed the fault and an emergency update from M$oft corrected it. If I had known this was the case a lot of unnecessary email with a third party software supplier would have been averted.
|
|
|
|
|
Always 3 for my personal and development machines. 99% of updates exist for a good reason so I have no issue with letting them all in, they have never caused an issue. In fact WinUpdates have saved me and many other PCs I've dealt with from serious issues with drivers and security.
The only time I've ever ignored an update is on fresh OS install where WinUpdate offers graphics drivers etc. While their ones usually work I prefer to get the latest, most correct drivers from the manufacturer themselves. Except on my Surface Pro 3, you definitely want to prefer windows updates to Intels generic driver!
|
|
|
|
|
|
I do 3 once a week. If you do not do it, the update (download) size could become too huge to manage.
TOMZ_KV
|
|
|
|
|
For machines I maintain for others, such as my work machine, or the system the family at home uses, it's (3) all the way.
For my personal machines, I let it download, but I decide when to install. This helps me to avoid most of the broken updates until after MS has already fixed those they decide is worth their time to fix. I used to try to play the I'll-review-and-decide-if-I-want-it game, but I don't bother anymore because MS doesn't provide enough information to make informed decisions anyway.
We can program with only 1's, but if all you've got are zeros, you've got nothing.
|
|
|
|
|
You know, the part about MS not providing enough information - this is what motivated me to post about this issue. I trailed along trying to determine exactly why they were patching. It was not possible.
Charlie Gilley
<italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape...
"Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
|
|
|
|
|
Used to 1 but it got to be a pain so I relaxed to 2 but then I never had any problems so these days it's a chilled out 3 ... age makes you wise (well, to be honest, age makes you lazy but that doesn't sound as good!)
|
|
|
|
|
I do 3 where allowed, 2 where required by group policy. Prefer 3, and haven't had a problem caused by WU in years (last time was a video or audio driver on NT 4). I may just be lucky though.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm on 1 & 3. I'm normally on 1 until I need to install a SP. As I'm not normally connected to the internet on dev machines, it doesn't really matter. It is not a security problem if it doesn't have an external network. I do 3 before I install the SP. Once that is done, the machine is off the network until it needs another SP.
|
|
|
|
|
Option 3 on live production servers. Seriously, how much time do you guys have to manually check everything?
We pay more for MS products so someone else does the checking right? Save me my time!!!
Also, for the last 4 years, never been a problem on win server 2008 r2 (yes, it needs upgrading...)
Yes, it reboots, but you can tell it what time of day to do that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Are all children now named after cartoon characters, or just the ones to seriously under-age mothers? 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
As I was telling CListCtrl and Bacon last night, one should always avoid fleeting cultural references when naming your children.
|
|
|
|
|
And even more important when getting a tattoo.
Pity those who got a "Gary Glitter" or "Jimmy Savile" in the 80's... 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I am sure when I was picking up my daughter from school last week a little girl (too young for primary education) was with a family and they were calling her Future.
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, we keep being told that children are the future...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Sadly we live in a far too sensible area. As an example the 1,000+ high school has never had more than one or two pregnancies in a year. The most risqué names would be Sara [without a H] or maybe a Siobhan [spelt correctly].
Moondust Jigsaw Farquwar III was expelled for being a ponce.
|
|
|
|
|
Nagy Vilmos wrote: Siobhan [spelt correctly]
But how often pronounced correctly?
No object is so beautiful that, under certain conditions, it will not look ugly. - Oscar Wilde
|
|
|
|
|
I tried to convince my offspring to name one of their kids "Zen" -(s)he'd be the coolest kid at school with a sardonic smile and not phased by anything.
Surprisingly they declined!
Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.
|
|
|
|
|
Strange that, I was speaking to pals Kylie and Jason about how their new born twins were getting on, they said that they were growing up fast and in fact Arduino was just starting to walk and RasPi was almost there. 
|
|
|
|
|
You'll be renaming them to Sunshine and Elephant once they become Teenagers.
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Are all children now named after cartoon characters
Well, we all can't be Original... now can we? 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
