|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: Removing Java from the machine fixed it.
Last time I installed Java on a machine, I think "Y2K" was still a new buzzword.
I've yet to encounter anything I want to use that requires it.
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Neely wrote: By default it was set to install ask.com's browser malware
It SO pisses me off that when you go to install Java, it comes along with all this other crap. And they're not alone in this BS behavior. It's one of the reasons I never click on "default installation" but make sure that under the custom option, there's isn't a load of crap that I don't want it to install.
Sue them, I say. Sue them!!!
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Neely wrote: I suspect the helpdesk is going to be busy the next few days.
Why? People can just google for a solutio...
Oh.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure if anyone is interested or if the software is shite, but I got 10 licenses for AUD$19.22. It'd have to be spectacularly faarrrkkkked for me to feel like I got ripped off.
FileSeek[^] on BitsDuJour[^].
Michael Martin
Australia
"I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible."
- Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
|
|
|
|
|
I bought FileLocator Pro and am very  with it.
|
|
|
|
|
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote: I bought FileLocator Pro and am very with it.
I'd hope so, for that money I could get almost 30 licenses for FileSeek.
Michael Martin
Australia
"I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible."
- Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
|
|
|
|
|
You can use FileLocator Lite or Agent Ransack for free. It's still worth it. The full version just adds a few more capabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote: You can use FileLocator Lite or Agent Ransack for free. It's still worth it. The full version just adds a few more capabilities.
I'm just being a smart arse. I only bought FileSeek because of the cheap price going on Bits DuJour and then upped it to 10 licenses when I saw the multi purchase discount was added on top of the limited time special offer.
Michael Martin
Australia
"I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible."
- Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
|
|
|
|
|
Gotcha! You have a business that you bought ten or are you really looking to give them away?
|
|
|
|
|
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote: Gotcha! You have a business that you bought ten or are you really looking to give them away?
Probably have enough computers around to use them all, nut actually threw a couple of extra on for a couple of unemployed mates that will use them.
Michael Martin
Australia
"I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible."
- Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
|
|
|
|
|
But why, Michael? Do you have that many PCs with lost files you need to find?
What would be really useful is a cheap utility to locate exact duplicates of files, and allow you to select which ones to delete. I have many such files, since over the years, as I've constructed new PCs and installed bigger drives, I've copied the entire contents of previous drives to the current one. It's no where near full, but like the inside of my head, it's cluttered in there...
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Wright wrote: But why, Michael? Do you have that many PCs with lost files you need to find?
Cause at AUD$1.92 each I couldn't buy less.
Roger Wright wrote: What would be really useful is a cheap utility to locate exact duplicates of files, and allow you to select which ones to delete. I have many such files, since over the years, as I've constructed new PCs and installed bigger drives, I've copied the entire contents of previous drives to the current one. It's no where near full, but like the inside of my head, it's cluttered in there...
I already have a tool that does that, bought it > 10 years ago and it has a lifetime license. Keep getting updates.
Michael Martin
Australia
"I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible."
- Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Martin wrote: Cause at AUD$1.92 each I couldn't buy less.
Given that I've now had as much cheap scotch tonight as you had Bundy's when you made the purchase, I can't argue the logic in that. Makes perfect sense...
Oops, my glass seems to have a hole in it - brb.
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Wright wrote: What would be really useful is a cheap utility to locate exact duplicates of files, and allow you to select which ones to delete
write one you muppet
B
MCAD
---
|
|
|
|
|
Gads, how I'd love to have the time and energy to write real code again. Maybe when I win the Lottery tomorrow night...
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lacks realism.
I mean, only 38?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Why, after all these years, is there still no standard for basic features of SQL. For example, the syntax for returning only [n] rows.
Top vs Limit[^]
This sort of stuff drives me nuts, as it requires a call out to the specific DB interface to properly generate the SQL for specific DB provider. Argh.
And if you want to do something more complex, like offsets and limits, this[^] is a fun read illustrating the syntax differences.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
A desire for lock-in: vendor $$$
According to my calculations, I should be able to retire about 5 years after I die.
|
|
|
|
|
As said, vendor lock in. It was the same thing (sorta still is a bit) with the web for years. Everyone wants you to think "their way" is the best way.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Jeremy Falcon wrote: Everyone wants you to think "their way" is the best way.
When we all know, my way is the only way.
Michael Martin
Australia
"I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible."
- Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Martin wrote: When we all know, my way is the only way.
there is always, "the highway".
|
|
|
|
|
LIMIT does make paging super easy. I know it's easier to do in SQL Server these days, but with LIMIT it's as easy as this:
SELECT * FROM mytable LIMIT 50, 50;
Assuming you're showing 50 records per page and currently viewing the second page.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Personally, I'd rather dump SQL completely, and go for a binary interface that doesn't let idiots leave themselves wide open to SQL Injection - but that's just crazy talk!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: but that's just crazy talk
You're thinking way too progressive man. Might one wanna take time to cherish the old archaic way. This way we don't have to learn new concepts.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
