|
Definitely! 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-----
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-----
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
You assume there was something there to be lost in the first place. 
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
This is true. 
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmmm.
It had always been my impression that expression one-man, one-wife were party of the safety instruction that all men should take due notice of.
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
But it's not clear on which man, or whose wife.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I just don't get invited to those sort of parties. 
That reminds me, I have a brilliant idea about using a piping hot cup of tea as a Brownian motion generator.
Alberto Brandolini: The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it.
|
|
|
|
|
Keith Barrow wrote: I just don't get invited to those sort of parties
There are websites for that.
|
|
|
|
|
Everyone gets so mad about not buying local. So riddle me this batman (and Bat Ladies) What the heck is the difference between buying from Sears via the Mail from 1900 and buying from Amazon via the mail/ups of today? I don't see the difference all that much. I would much rather give the business to Amazon than Walmart? Just saying. and I do support local when I can. But seriously. I can shop from home in my underwear instead of going to Walmart and seeing people shoping in their underwear. Discuss???
To err is human to really mess up you need a computer
|
|
|
|
|
you make this post sound like a exam question
my answer is Starbucks
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote: my answer is Starbucks
Mine CL's answer is 42 
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 29-Sep-14 10:02am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corrected
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
All H2G2 references get automatically up-voted!
Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.
|
|
|
|
|
Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote: my answer is Starbucks
Then the question would have to be "What is that vile liquid?"
|
|
|
|
|
I couldn't comment having never tasted it, I can, however confirm that the smell that emanates from the establishment does induce nausea
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
The concept of "local" is itself sorta fuzzy these days.
On one side you hear - increase minimum wage.
On the other side you hear - local labor is expensive, hence the Chinese goods.
Increase in globalization will always hurt the first world more than the developing nations. The one way to fight that is to improve efficiency, find better energy sources, minimize waste, reduce population etc. Easier said than done.
|
|
|
|
|
Nish Sivakumar wrote: reduce population
What?
|
|
|
|
|
It's a pretty easy concept. The first three things he listed, "improve efficiency, find better energy sources, minimize waste", are more easily approached and solved with a smaller population.
The United States invariably does the right thing, after having exhausted every other alternative. -Winston Churchill
America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between. -Oscar Wilde
Wow, even the French showed a little more spine than that before they got their sh*t pushed in.[^] -Colin Mullikin
modified 29-Sep-14 11:36am.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. 
|
|
|
|
|
And so, uh... who is he implying we "reduce"? Or maybe there is a demographic of undesirables?
Must that part of history repeat?
|
|
|
|
|
Noo... reducing the ones that are already there is not a good idea and you probably won't get away with it... history should tell us. 
Uhm... how to reduce... forced vasectomy?
|
|
|
|
|
Pualee wrote: Or maybe there is a demographic of undesirables?
Well, we could start with VB programmers.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Or stop consuming like there's infinite resources?
New version: WinHeist Version 2.1.0 Beta
Have you ever just looked at someone and knew the wheel was turning but the hamster was dead?
Trying to understand the behavior of some people is like trying to smell the color 9.
I'm not crazy, my reality is just different than yours!
|
|
|
|
|
there's no difference between mail order then and mail order now.
but, in 1900 you simply could not get everything locally. mail order was the only way to get a lot of things.
that's not the case for most people, today.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Losinger wrote: but, in 1900 you simply could not get everything locally.
Still can't get everything locally. Not even close. And I live in a moderately large size town and have not one but two walmarts relatively close to where I live.
Probably because there are far more choices now.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
