|
This site could help you. I found more than bunch of nice utilities here. Unfortunately this site not opening @ work.
http://alternativeto.net/[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I became a lifetime member of LibraryThing[^] when they first started. All my books are online and I love it.
I've also used the comics app of Collectorz[^]. It's not free, but extremely powerful. I assume their book app is just as good.
Not sure how helpful these are for business, but they're great for personal use.
|
|
|
|
|
Am I the only person wondering why @DalekDave hasn't replied yet? For a change he'd actually be posting something he knew about. 
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
It is not free but cheap, and sometimes paying for something is better than getting it for free. I have used quickbooks for over a decade (not that I am an expert; I just data-enter)
|
|
|
|
|
The Uniform Law Commission was expected to endorse a plan Wednesday to automatically give loved ones access to a deceased person’s digital accounts, unless otherwise specified in a will.
Now, I will start writing my last will to whom I will give my precious Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr and Instagram account and password if I die.
BTW, Link's safe to open. No Paris. 
Don't mind those people who say you're not HOT. At least you know you're COOL.
I'm not afraid of falling, I'm afraid of the sudden stop at the end of the fall! - Richard Andrew x64
|
|
|
|
|
|
Karen Mitchelle wrote: precious Facebook, Twitter, accounts
 I must be missing something, or do we need a sarcasm emoticon?
Whether I think I can, or think I can't, I am always bloody right!
|
|
|
|
|
Agent__007 wrote: or do we need a sarcasm emoticon?
We don't just need it. We badly need it! 
Don't mind those people who say you're not HOT. At least you know you're COOL.
I'm not afraid of falling, I'm afraid of the sudden stop at the end of the fall! - Richard Andrew x64
|
|
|
|
|
Karen Mitchelle wrote: Now, I will start writing my last will to whom I will give my precious Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr and Instagram account and password if I die.
Since CodeProject is not included, you can safely do that.
THESE PEOPLE REALLY BOTHER ME!! How can they know what you should do without knowing what you want done?!?!
-- C++ FQA Lite
|
|
|
|
|
My first thought was "bollocks to that!".
The second and subsequent ones weren't much different, either.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japanese prank shows do it better than ours used to[^]
SFW - probably. Not sure in Japan, there could be swearing. My Japanese is limited to "Hello, is Ruriko there?" and not understanding the response at all...
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: My Japanese is limited to "Hello, is Ruriko there?" and not understanding the response at all
Wow. In that case I know just about as much Japanese as you do. Fascinating.
That video is hilarious though.
A related video, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=smhjcDvZFtw[^] is a prank where they make it look like someone in the airport is a wanted criminal. Too hilarious.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
I think I've worked out who was inside the costume[^].
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Funny!
Yeah I could see where there could be a lot of swearing in Japanese.
As I grow older I've found that pleasing everyone is impossible but pissing everyone off is a piece of cake.
|
|
|
|
|
Funny but no swearing, and looks staged. It's from some stupid TV show or other.
And if you're wondering what Japanese TV shows are like, this[^] is a perfect description.
|
|
|
|
|
I thought the first part of this[^] was a brilliant idea.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Ow! That messes with my head, man! 
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
Query for all the naysayers ... which would you rather have fast floating point operations or 15 places of accurate precision? Most of my work four places is good enough and I wrote a hurricane damage simulator.
|
|
|
|
|
Ennis Ray Lynch, Jr. wrote: four places is good enough
 Four is often overkill.
You'll never get very far if all you do is follow instructions.
|
|
|
|
|
Why can't we have both? Not both in the same thing, but two different types, one for each.
But if I had to choose, give me the fast but counter-intuitive and weird thing. You can't emulate fast. You can emulate accuracy, if necessary.
|
|
|
|
|
We do have both, their are libraries that allow for infinite precision just peeps don't use them because they are slow. (Infinite subject to limits of hardware)
|
|
|
|
|
Right, so why ask us to choose?
|
|
|
|
|
I would like to have a bunch of smart developers, you know the ones able to write hurricane damage simulators using only four places of precision.
THESE PEOPLE REALLY BOTHER ME!! How can they know what you should do without knowing what you want done?!?!
-- C++ FQA Lite
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
