|
What, Code? All Goto!
No, I don't use it.
(Probably should though: but hasn't been a priority for me)
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: What, Code? All Goto!
Oh, so that's what it means?! 
I meant, what would be the more meaningful expression to you?
WCAG? or accessible?!
|
|
|
|
|
Well, when I woke up this morning, I knew what "accessible" meant. "WCAG" I'd never heard of.
Which am I more likely to use? "Accessible" unless there is a specific reason for using "WCAG" - like I felt the need to impress someone with my knowledge of acronyms. Which generally make people actually think "The muppet - why won't he talk English?"
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Which am I more likely to use? "Accessible" unless there is a specific reason for using "WCAG" - like I felt the need to impress someone with my knowledge of acronyms. Which generally make people actually think "The muppet - why won't he talk English?"
You too, hey?! ^^
|
|
|
|
|
Everybody probably uses it to some degree without realising it.
The standards are set and companies like Apple / MS / Google etc. then build the OS and websites to meet these standards and set the guidelines. Naming Conventions / Colour standards / Layout etc / General UX
Everybody then builds their own applications and websites that tend to follow current trends and align with the look and feel of the majors. The development tools also ensure compliance to some extent.
The result is that you unknowingly comply to some extent (ok, probably no where close to 100%) with the WCAG without even realising it.
|
|
|
|
|
To be clear my question is not whether I used it without knowing, it's about vocabulary!
Does "WCAG" means something to you? Does "accessibility"? Which one speaks more to you?
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, well yes Accessibility mean ssomething to me as It formed an element of my degree a couple of years ago as part of the Fundamental of Interaction Design (M364[^]) module.
|
|
|
|
|
Double You is the most awful letter to pronounce in English. It sounds like its two letters, Double and You. It also looks more like a Double Vee. The person who invented Double You was clearly drunk (and probably seeing double).
I'd never use an acronym having the letter Double You in it. I hadn't heard of it before either (or maybe I had, but I banned it from memory because of the Double You).
In Dutch it sounds more like Wee 
It's an OO world.
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
So true! Double El is the only valid letter! 
|
|
|
|
|
I had absolutely no idea what it meant.
What's wrong with the word "accessible"? 
I pity you.
|
|
|
|
|
Haha! You understand me so well!!
|
|
|
|
|
If you create a website in VS and open the property pages you have a tab called "Accessibility".
In this tab you have a check box for "WCAG".
What this means to me, is that if I mess up my html according to whatever standard "WCAG" is,I get a warning.
|
|
|
|
|
Ho, interesting!
There is no such setting in "ASP .NET Web Application" project type...
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting indeed, I willl have to have a look at that when I come home tonight.
|
|
|
|
|
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Correct, I have not seen Titanic, nor do I intend to.
|
|
|
|
|
Better version[^]
Well - shorter, but concise and to the point.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
I'd watch that
It's an OO world.
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately, it's not hard to believe that people are still spending so much time and effort on such an old gag.
Creativity? Forget it; let's just do the same gag that's been done a million times, but with newer tech.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I have noticed that Xamarin appears to be quite a favoured topic for Articles, Blogs and Tips at the moment.
I haven't used it, I have had a look at the website, sounds / looks good, but the question is: Is it really? Does it justify its price?
Just curious.........
|
|
|
|
|
DaveAuld wrote: Does it justify its price?
Not to me, it doesn't.
And I still want to use C# on OpenVMS.
You'll never get very far if all you do is follow instructions.
modified 27-Jun-14 18:55pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It depends on how lazy you are. I'm working on a project and I don't want to be bothered to learn Java/Eclipse. Xamarin has been easy and seems to work great.
Hogan
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
