|
Mike Hankey wrote: A marriage and a funeral are not that different are they?
In the latter, only one life has ended 
Alberto Brandolini: The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it.
|
|
|
|
|
I second you !! 
|
|
|
|
|
It does. Although most people get bored waiting for the deceased to throw the flowers after about 2 hours.
|
|
|
|
|
"Bouquet", Dearie, not wreath. Wreaths are for funerals.
The practice started about a zillion years ago, in Europe, where the garter was thrown -- but that was something unwholesome to do with checking that the marriage had been consummated, apparently, so brides started throwing their bouquets, instead.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
The groom is the one who throws the garter..
Don't mind those people who say you're not HOT. At least you know you're COOL.
I'm not afraid of falling, I'm afraid of the sudden stop at the end of the fall! - Richard Andrew x64
|
|
|
|
|
Wow. The rumours of rampant transvestitism in the Philippines must be true.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
The bride is the one who wears the garter and the groom will take it off the bride's leg.
Don't mind those people who say you're not HOT. At least you know you're COOL.
I'm not afraid of falling, I'm afraid of the sudden stop at the end of the fall! - Richard Andrew x64
|
|
|
|
|
Interestingly, that's only in the US.
The garter tradition originated back to the 14th century. In parts of Europe the guests of the bride and groom believed having a piece of the bride’s clothing was thought to bring good luck. They would actually destroy the brides dress by ripping off pieces of fabric. Obviously, this tradition did not sit well with the bride, so she began throwing various items to the guests – the garter being one of them. It became customary for the bride to toss the garter to the men. But this also caused a great problem for the bride….sometimes the men would get drunk, become impatient and try to remove the garter ahead of time. Therefore, the custom derived at having the groom remove and toss the garter to the men. With this change, the bride began to toss the bridal boutique to the unwed girls who were eligible for marriage.
http://www.wedalert.com/tale_tossing_of_the_garter/[^]
An Old English custom was while the bride and groom were in their bridal chamber, the wedding guests would sneak into the chamber picking up discarded stockings and throwing them at the couple. Whoever flung a stocking that hung on the bride or groom’s nose, would be the next to marry.
You have to wonder where else they got hung, and what fate befell the thrower...
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
In Italy, the groom is attacked with scissors, his tie is cut up into strips, and the guests each buy a piece.
I'd wear at least three ties, and open a market stall.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
They could throw the gravestone and make sure it happens.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, there's an old joke relating to that topic. It goes something like this:
On every wedding of a relative that I visited, my aunts came over, poked me in the cheek and said: You will be the next one.
They only stopped when I started doing the same to them on funerals.
The good thing about pessimism is, that you are always either right or pleasently surprised.
|
|
|
|
|
Karen Mitchelle wrote: There's a ritual in a Filipino wedding wherein the bride will throw her bouquet and whoever (lady) who catches it will be the next bride..
Not only Filipino, but also in the US and parts of Europe. Guess it also depends on personal stuff.
The console is a black place
|
|
|
|
|
@Chris-Maunderr: Don't you think it's time for CP to have a kinda personal messaging system? Inboxs and the likes?
|
|
|
|
|
Why?
Just what useful purpose would that serve?
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
And what useful purpose does Da Lounge serve? Yet we still use it! 
|
|
|
|
|
Nagy Vilmos wrote: And what useful purpose does Da Lounge serve?
The Lounge was originally started because of a number of complaints from your colleagues that you were talking to them.
It's great to see something achieve a worthwhile objective.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
So I can PM people right here on CP without others seeing what we discussed! Like career issues not meant for the public eyes.
|
|
|
|
|
We already have that: there is an email link below each message, which send your message - and your login email address - to the person who wrote the post.
You can then communicate privately by email, if that's what both of you want.
But the rest of the site is about open discussion, open sharing.
Private discussions don't help that.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
|
IIRC that idea has been shot down several times before.
|
|
|
|
|
This has been raised many times. The answer will be no.
This is a community, so content should be public. There is a facility to contanct members privately should they wish to enable it. Failing that there are the forums and the article sections.
|
|
|
|
|
Please don't. You already have one; why do you need an email-inbox per website? What's the case for having to check your mail in more than 20 different locations, each with their own password?
I can already promise I'll ignore everything that gets sent there, just as with the mailbox that the government and the bank created.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, please, NO!!!
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, but as others have said: We have no plans for private messaging other than the private emails that can be sent in response to forum postings.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, it was just a thought and am very sure you have your reasons!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
