|
Instructions to view the picture:
1) Click here[^]
2) Hold down ALT, and press "Print Screen"
3) Open Paint, GIMP, or your other preferred image processing application.
4) Paste the clipboard content as a new image (details vary depending on your chosen application).
5) Print the image to your printer (details vary depending on your chosen application, and printer).
6) Enjoy!
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
You sure #2 will work? What if OP is using iSomething or some kind of linux or a keyboard where one needs to press function key too to do a print screen.
I should be a lawyer.
|
|
|
|
|
Yep. Of course, he may also need to find a permanent marker first... 
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
Alternative for #2
-> Look at what is said and picture that is a picture that proves it was said indeed 
Loading signature...
. . . Please Wait . . .
|
|
|
|
|
Don't mind those people who say you're not HOT. At least you know you're COOL.
I'm not afraid of falling, I'm afraid of the sudden stop at the end of the fall! - Richard Andrew x64
|
|
|
|
|
I know you are probably thinking "Oh, no. Not another feeble minded post about WinXP. Let the smoldering ashes rest"! 
I just found it interesting, that my XP box had 4 updates today, April 9th [Office Update, IE8 Security Update, XP Security Update and Malicious Software Removal Tool update].
I suppose they could have been received by the system yesterday, but I saw no trace of them when I turned it off last night, well after midnight.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting. I have XP on a laptop that I rarely use but tried getting updates the last few weeks and there weren't any. I'll have to try again and see if I get that "last gasp of support". 
<sig notetoself="think of a better signature">
<first>Jim</first> <last>Meadors</last>
</sig>
|
|
|
|
|
Jim Meadors wrote: I'll have to try again and see if I get that "last gasp of support".
The last "gasp of support" is probably some malware to make your XP die within a month so that you're cut-off from support and have to upgrade to Win8.
|
|
|
|
|
I've got an old Win2K machine, should I check for updates on that too? 
|
|
|
|
|
Funny you should ask. I recently noticed a Win2K Server system I 'inherited' has 65 updates waiting. I have no idea how long ago they were received as I was not previously in charge of that system. 
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
Win2K, you can throw rocks at it and carries on. (Once got a test system I built back from some of a previous companies Israeli clients with what looked like 50Cal bullets holes in, system worked fine!) 
|
|
|
|
|
I've still got a Win2k RC2 machine around the house, and it's never failed me. It hasn't been powered up in several years, but I bet it would work like a charm. But then nothing I use regularly would run on it anymore... 
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
same here i also get update from window xp last night.
Ravi Khoda
|
|
|
|
|
SoMad wrote: I just found it interesting, that my XP box had 4 updates today, April 9th
It was still April 8 on some lands on earth due to time difference
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think so - not when the icon showed up telling me there were updates ready. I am in the same time zone as Redmond and I did not see any updates when I turned my system off late last night.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
Do not install them then its not Microsoft its a hacker
|
|
|
|
|
That I'm sure everyone here will want to participate in[^].
Fifty years of
10 PRINT ^G^L
20 GOTO 10
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Been there, done that - made a business trip for GE around 1969. Interesting place, interesting people. It was fall, and the local connecting airline (I had landed in Boston) cancelled its flight due to weather conditions (just too much haze, not rain), so I had to rent a car and drive there through all of the beautiful Maples decked out in their beautiful fall leaves. What a wonderful trip.
Dave.
|
|
|
|
|
We never did that "print a bell and a formfeed forever", but we DID something about as nasty.
Those GE Terminet printers had a rubber band with metal "tounges" for each character, looping in front of the paper. Whenever a character "tounge" passed the position where that character was to be printed, a solenid stroke the tounge from behind, making it hit the paper (through an ink ribbon). There was one solenoid for each of the 132 printing positions. If the "A" tounge passed the position where an "A" was to be printed at the same time as the "Z" tounge passed the position where a "Z" was to be printed, the two solenoids would strike at the same time.
We did some experimenting to see how many solenoids we could make strike at the same moment, using carefully prepared text lines. It turned out that you couldn't make all 132 fire together, but you could fire every second, making 66 hammers hit the roller at the same time. The impact made the printer jump about half an inch. We made a program to repeat this for the specified number of lines; the program was given the descriptive name "bang". "bang 6" would make the printer fire six times, making six small jumps, and "bang 10" left a burnt-out power supply...
The IT operations guys at our university never discovered the "bang" program, and was very puzzled by the repeated breakdowns of the printer power supplies, making several inquires to the manufacturer about the problem. After a while, the novelty of "bang" wore off.
|
|
|
|
|
That is delightfully evil! Not as portable as ^G^L, but definitely more amusing.
I think I remember those printers (at University): as I recall they were noisy bitches at the best of times. I can't imagine them in full death-throe mode.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
"But, Mommy, what they doin' ?"
"Shhhh ... Timmy ... they can hear you."
"MIT Geniuses Made A Drone That Can Charge Itself Without Coming Back Down To Earth" [^].
Joseph Moore and Russ Tedrake. "Magnetic localization for perching UAVs on powerlines." IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), September 2011 [^].
“Use the word 'cybernetics,' Norbert, because nobody knows what it means. This will always put you at an advantage in arguments.” Claude Shannon (Information Theory scientist): letter to Norbert Weiner of M.I.T., circa 1940
|
|
|
|
|
That's why I have a shotgun! No flappy bird's going to steal electricity from my company!
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
"Mom, why do I always have to wear a helmet outside?"
"Shut up and bring more of those dead drones to the recycler than last month!"
The drones are built with the same components used for model helicopters.
The batteries last only minutes and every additional weight (including stronger batteries) costs more energy. Taking energy inductively from power lines can work, but at the cost of turning the power lines into drone highways. This may cause traffic jams and collisions. Also, the batteries had to be reduced to a minimum to allow a greater payload and the additional induction coil and battery charger. The drone could only reach places that are less than a few minute's flight time away from a power line.
The motors are not built for constant use. They produce too much heat which lowers their life time. Allowing the motor to cool down between flights prolongs their life, but even then they would only last some days of constant use. Failure would be hard to predict. Just last week a friend#s new motor failed after less than an hour of total flight time. Motor failure in the air leads to a nice destructive crash. A traditional helicopter at least allows a skilled pilot to land with auto rotation. The extra weight for heat sinks or more robust motors again would limit the usefulness of the drone too much.
Lithium polymere batteries tend to degrade quickly when they are discharged too low. In that case not only their capacity is quickly reduced. They can also heat up too much and catch fire or even explode. The batteries can be monitored, but what should a drone do when the battery fails and begins to heat up? Land? Ask for help?
Ah yes, another great cause of failure is vibration. Vibration can weaken carbon fiber structures or cut wires. No matter what breaks of fails that way, the result usually is a crash. And again, the extra weight for reinforcing everything as a precaution gets expensive.
What use would be drones that need that much maintainance or most probably crash within a few days of autonomous operation?
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
I hold an A-7 computer expert classification, Commodore. I'm well acquainted with Dr. Daystrom's theories and discoveries. The basic design of all our ship's computers are JavaScript.
modified 10-Apr-14 0:49am.
|
|
|
|
|
Have you guys noticed the ::Workspaces counter on the main page?
A few days ago it was below 100,000 (I want to say it was at 90,000 last week, but I could be wrong). It looks like this feature is really taking off. I want to get started on a ::Workspace project too, but I just don't have the time right now. 
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
Do not forget that every article opens a workspace, automatically...but it's really nice - I moved my projects from TFS online and like it very much...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
