The Lounge - CodeProject

JimmyRopes8-Apr-14 23:05

8-Apr-14 23:05

Dalek Dave wrote:
However, there are ghosts, (95% of ATM's are XP Based) and these are going to haunt us all for years to come, so farewell XP, be seeing you soon!

You are correct that 95% of the world's ATMs run Windows XP embedded OS, but Microsoft is going to support Windows XP embedded OS until 12 January 2016.

Hopefully, by then the banks will have upgraded to Windows 7 embedded OS. There is more reason to do that sooner rather than later because there are some security exposures that are present in Windows XP embedded OS that are fixed in Windows 7 embedded OS.

Some of which are being able to send an SMS to the ATM and have it give you money, as well as a Mexican hack (Backdoor.Ploutus) using an external keyboard to get the machine to spew money.

I think the banks will be more inclined to replace Windows XP embedded before it's use by date has arrived than general business applications have been updated.

One can only hope.

The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain

Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs

I'm on-line therefore I am.
JimmyRopes

Re: It is odd how we view old friends

Mitchell J.8-Apr-14 23:20

Mitchell J.

8-Apr-14 23:20

Personally, I don't think 8 will be "killed off".

IMHO, MS is trying to destroy the "every four years a brand new edition of Windows comes out" mentality and replace it with an "every few months this thing called Windows OS gets updated" frame of mind.

For example, when Android 4.4.3 comes out, it won't be thought of as "the brand-new Android OS", but simply as an update. Even iOS7, with it's radical UI changes, managed to pass through the public mind as an "big update". I think MS desires this sort of public response to Windows Updates, especially as they try to turn it into a more mobile platform.

Re: It is odd how we view old friends

kalberts9-Apr-14 0:51

kalberts

9-Apr-14 0:51

I loved XP from day 1.

I never was into NT or 2K, but was struggling to make 32 bit software under Win9x. A really heavy load was liftet off my shoulders when XP arrived. Besides, it was magnitudes more stable.

The problem with Vista is that XP was too good. There was little reason to throw it out.
The problem with Win8 is that Win7 is too good. There is no reason to throw it out.

For the desktop computer, a whole new world of possibilities opened up when going from 9x to XP. A number of real needs could be covered. It took a number of years to identify almost all remaining desktop needs, enough to justify a final "tying up all the loose ends in the needs field" with Win7. On the desktop, no real, easily identifiable needs are remaining, that everyone knows about. To the phone market, Win8 was like XP: It finally made Windows a real alternative. Another major round, similar to Win7, will be needed in a couple of years. But then the work will be done, and Windows must move to new arenas if it is to expand further.

Re: It is odd how we view old friends

ZurdoDev9-Apr-14 1:17

ZurdoDev

9-Apr-14 1:17

Quote:
We all hated XP when it first came out.

Do you have a mouse in your pocket?

XP was great and still is.

There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.

Re: It is odd how we view old friends

Mike Hankey9-Apr-14 12:25

Mike Hankey

9-Apr-14 12:25

I went from 2k to xp and loved it, kept it until drivers no longer available for peripherals I bought.

Along with Antimatter and Dark Matter they've discovered the existence of Doesn't Matter which appears to have no effect on the universe whatsoever!
Rich Tennant 5th Wave

CCC 9/4/14

Dalek Dave8-Apr-14 22:20

Dalek Dave

8-Apr-14 22:20

"Indian Capital?"(8)

I like this!

---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.

Welcome to the Lounge