|
|
There is a problem with this.
Some of my devices need a fair amount of power.
And I have a number of metal plates that have been attached to various bones over the years... 
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
Well hopefully you won't be attracted towards the hub 
btw it leads me to another side of the coin, how will I stop my device from getting charged?
|
|
|
|
|
There is that - but there's also Faraday's Law[^] which means every time I cross the room I'm going to get electrocuted... 
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: And I have a number of metal plates that have been attached to various bones over the years...
Honest constable, I'm not drunk, I'm just being pulled about by all the magnetic fields.
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
My dad has a pacemaker, he can't get near the hob in our house as it's using induction for heating.
|
|
|
|
|
Or go near a microwave in case the seals are damaged...
The fun was when one hospital wanted to give me a MRI, until they were persuaded to run a metal detector over me first! 
Airports are fun too...
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
So what happened to you? A train wreck?
|
|
|
|
|
No, I've had a few motorcycle and car accidents over the years is all.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
Never seen this[^] before? 
|
|
|
|
|
The true wireless current! 
|
|
|
|
|
The laws of physics makes this one of the most inefficient and useless ideas except for really short range stuff, like putting your phone on a pad or the way your cordless toothbrush recharges itself through induction.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Last week (Thursday) I was doing some searching on Gumtree (like Craigslist etc) for a video lens. Shortly I was presented with an ad for a new lens a at a good price from an on line camera store. It looked good and said they had 1 in stock so I ordered and paid using Paypal ($A550). All cleared and money debited from my credit card which I settled.
Today I get email to say not in stock and they would try to get it in maybe 7-14 days.
I spat the dummy and let them have it - to me it did not seem time for niceties.
I buy tons of stuff on line and have often been told that account is only debited when ready to ship which seems as it should be.
What is the general view about the kind of practice this mob engaged in?
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
These things happen.
Specialist items are not usually carried in large numbers and errors creep in in stock control systems from time to time.
I have it.
Some customer will request a [INSERT ITEM HERE] as part of an order.
I will collate and deliver 95% of the order and have one item on back order as I am OOS.
I also take money up front on the webstore purchases, although offer a monthly credit account to my regular business customers.
Personally, wouldn't sweat it for a while, so long as you are in touch, give them the lead time to get and deliver the lens.
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
I can understand an error. If they had contacted me to tell me an error had occurred and perhaps asked me if I wanted a refund or was prepared to wait then no problem. That isn't how it played out.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
I agree if it's not been shipped then how can they charge you for something that they haven't provided?
I had a company do this to me a while back and I will never order from them again. They said it was a mix up in their billing and it is a reputable company but none the less.
Along with Antimatter and Dark Matter they've discovered the existence of Doesn't Matter which appears to have no effect on the universe whatsoever!
Rich Tennant 5th Wave
|
|
|
|
|
You may be able to dispute the charge on PayPal since you were not provided with the item that the charge is for.
The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
I'm on-line therefore I am.
JimmyRopes
|
|
|
|
|
Having just discovered code metric in VS2013 I naturally pushed the button got a bunch of interesting numbers which MS describes but I was wondering what a good maintainability index should be, I have 80 over 11k lines of code.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
One thing that code metrics doesn't really cope with is the complexity of the system.
The design can only be built to solve the requirements (with a bit of future proofing if time allows), like most statistics they can give you a feel of what is going on but sometimes you have to trust your experience
|
|
|
|
|
By itself, a high level Maintainability Index doesn't actually add much value. You need to drill down and look in more depth - see what the maintainability is as you drill into the project, and don't forget to pay attention to the cyclomatic complexity. If this 80 was reflected all the way down, it would indicate that there weren't too many major issues, but your cycolmatic complexity is probably going to be high. According to Microsoft[^], they calculate the cmoplexity based on this formula:
Maintainability Index = Max(0,(171 - 5.2 * log(Halstead Volume) - 0.23 * (Cyclomatic Complexity) - 16.2 * log(Lines of Code))*100 / 171)
|
|
|
|
|
I was curious more than desperately looking for something to do, like testing frameworks we simply do not have the time and resources to spend on those sort of niceties.
There is never enough time to build the stuff they want, a few years ago I started calling our apps POCs hoping to get a second bite at them, never happened, we have over 20 POCs in production.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
I always find it interesting the way that companies are willing to accept an accretion of technical debt. The concept that there's no time for testing or working to a loosely coupled, easily extensible application makes me want to sit back and watch as the whole edifice comes crashing around them once they have to significant upgrades that just don't fit into this untestable, tightly coupled monstrosity that they have pressured people into building.
The analogy that I like to work with is building a house. If you built a plastic house shell and decided two years down the line that you wanted to extend it - say by extending the base level out 30 foot, you will expand a heck of a lot of effort and what you would end up with would be significantly weakened at the join points (this is assuming that you could do it). Now, if you build your house out of bricks, while it may take you longer to join them together initially, if you want to upgrade the house later on it's significantly less work and as long as the job is done properly, the superstructure is not weakened in any way.
|
|
|
|
|
As I work for an organisation that outsourced it's entire IT, development and support to IBM in the 90's I feel bloody lucky to get the limited resources we have. We are treated as pariahs by IBM and obstructed by policy set for pig iron systems.
Other that ours and 2 other DEPARTMENTAL teams they have absolutely no IP, everything comes from a vendor, basically they drop their pants, bend over and the vendors f*** them.
While the apps taken as a whole maybe monstrous 11k lines of code is probably about average, all are built on the same framework and all conform to our internal standards so they get supported and extended, not a 30' room but more like a dunny or 2.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Maintenance Complexity[^]
I don't know how similar CodeRush's calculation of maintenance complexity is to VS's but I would imagine they're similar.
Scroll about 2/3 down to see the MC table. So, approximately no more than 200 to be "relatively easy to maintain."
I tend to pay more attention to cyclomatic complexity. I like to get below 10. But sometimes you can be below 10 here while being over 300 in MC. I have one such method in my current section of code.
My aim is to keep both measures low in general (in cases where I have control) but if the odd case is higher than the ideal figures then evaluate it on its merits.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
"It hangs around to play the thing in hackneyed surroundings."(10)
Bit hard this one.
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
