|
Yeah, but I actually read it in a reputable movie magazine and there is a very non-informative entry on IMDB about it:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1289401[^]
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-----
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-----
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
It was in Empire magazine last year, and then the follow up was in saying that Bill Murray was still refusing.
|
|
|
|
|
![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.freetls.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif) R.I.P. a great performer
|
|
|
|
|
Animal house is a classic. 
|
|
|
|
|
Johnny J. wrote: Bill Murray, don't you ever die!
Don't watch Zombieland then....
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
I hold an A-7 computer expert classification, Commodore. I'm well acquainted with Dr. Daystrom's theories and discoveries. The basic design of all our ship's computers are JavaScript.
|
|
|
|
|
I was just about to post this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHBmShA8P28[^] when I saw your post... 
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
That's actually the perfect solutions. A zombie Bill Murray would be funny forever.
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps someone can explain to me why?
Whenever I use intellisense auto completion, it shortens the namespace. For Example:
if the root namespace is: "MyCompany.MyProject.Foo"
Then generate code will appear: (note, I wrote the left-hand side of the equals)
MyCompany.MyProject.Bar.SomeObject = new Bar.SomeObject();
This makes it such a PITA to refactor (move code around to a more appropriate place) Why not just use the fully qualified namespace? It is clear I have already made the choice not to use an include so why automatically assume brevity is the priority?
|
|
|
|
|
It does this if the opening parts of the namespace you're in match opening parts of the namespace you're referencing.
|
|
|
|
|
What Pete said, and I think it's prettier and better. So who's preference should win?
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.-John Q. Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering.-Wernher von Braun
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.-Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
In my opinion, the overriding solution would be to make the right-side (generated) match the left side. Which would also solve the annoying feature of Intellisense chosing long and int over Int64 and Int32 which, when I use them, are for descriptive purposes. If you type something on the left, autocorrect should match it on the right, not pick a different version. The best intellisense uses the intelli to facilitate the programmer.
We are coming to a world where the choice is either capitulation to Intellisense or code in NotePad. The auto correct and intellisense is so burdensome now that I do indeed turn it off completely sometimes.
|
|
|
|
|
You have a point. At least it should/could be a setting in options.
Ennis Ray Lynch, Jr. wrote: intellisense is so burdensome
Yeah, been there. Sometimes it's annoying.
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.-John Q. Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering.-Wernher von Braun
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.-Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
Ennis Ray Lynch, Jr. wrote: or code in NotePad
Notepad sucks. I rolled my own. 
This space intentionally left blank.
|
|
|
|
|
Huh, never seen that, I always get the fully-qualified name... oh, that's right you probably have a using directive. 
This space intentionally left blank.
|
|
|
|
|
No, if I comment out all of my using directives (and I only use using namespaces not aliases) I still get the exact same behavior.
|
|
|
|
|
Shouldn't that be
global::MyCompany.MyProject.Bar.SomeObject MyObjectName = new global::MyCompany.MyProject.Bar.SomeObject(); ?
Don't be too distracted by the prefix, but you forgot to give your variable a name. That's a syntax error.
OT; VS prefixes correctly if I remove it's using as PIEBALD suggested.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Mine doesn't. I guess my version of visual studio just wants to punish me.
|
|
|
|
|
Tequila.
This space intentionally left blank.
|
|
|
|
|
I actually have a couple of places where I use global::, but even I don't use it unless necessary.
This space intentionally left blank.
|
|
|
|
|
A useful tome[^]
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
Also useful is this tome[^], but who would have thought that you would need to know how to do this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
You and me me and Tiger too!
Now that's funny. 
|
|
|
|
|
Crap, crap, and triple crap! By clicking on those links, Amazon is going to refer me to similar sh*tty books from now on.
|
|
|
|
|
That's just great, now my Amazon suggestions are for books about poo...
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
