|
Pretty much what I'm doing too. Typing actual code is less than 1% of my work, not counting hacks in response to a question on CP or elsewhere. I think a lot, sketch a lot, eventually do some UML designs (which might in fact be somewhat interesting to someone who knows UML), and at some point have my UML tool generate some code. Only then I'll start fill in some blanks until I either get it to work or realize I've missed an important aspect - at which point I return to step one 
Perhaps I should add that as a mathematician I'm more concerned with creating new, optimized algorithms for very specific applications than cranking out what I like to refer to as "fluff code". 
GOTOs are a bit like wire coat hangers: they tend to breed in the darkness, such that where there once were few, eventually there are many, and the program's architecture collapses beneath them. (Fran Poretto)
|
|
|
|
|
As a ameture, It might be too much to follow. But I think you should have chosen a forum Like this[^] for this post.
Having said that, I would be interested.
David
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the feedback, David. I plan on doing it again once or twice this week, so I'll be sure to post in all relevant places ahead of time.
What day/time works best for you, by the way?
|
|
|
|
|
Evening's Us eastern time. Or weekends. Someone suggested A Screen cast, and I think that would be better.
But either way thank You.
David
|
|
|
|
|
|
Are you thinking about pair programming / XP development?
I've been involved in pair programming a few times. Not sure if it works well.
|
|
|
|
|
It's a little like pair programming, except "pair" usually means "two", and Google+ Hangouts supports quite a bit more than two people at the same time. And more than likely, I'd be the only on with access to the IDE. Would still share my thought process and accept feedback along the way though.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, but I don't see that having a lot of draw. These days people don't want to be on your schedule, tuning in when you are ready to start. Making a recording available instead makes a lot more sense to me. That way the viewers can view, pause, rewind, etc. at their own pace.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
David
|
|
|
|
|
I understand a number of the participants of the Ludum Dare contest do something like this using Twitch.tv.
HTH
Check out my latest article: Hot Shots, my App Innovation contest entry for 2013.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Very cool! 18,000 views is inspiring, though I have no way of knowing whether or not that's because the video is two years old and/or there are a lot of people interested in development of that game. Still, this leaves me feeling like there's some chance of this experiment being successful.
|
|
|
|
|
Just last week I saw a presentation of something along these lines. Check out Andrew Sorensen[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Wow! Thanks for this link! I've learned so much about live coding from this thread already (it exists, for one!), but this video is a true gem! Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
I genuinely hate having people constantly being able to stare at my screen. Experience taught me that my efficiency actually goes down when people are able to look at my screen.
So not for me thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
I understand the feeling, V. Having someone, let alone a LOT of people, staring over your shoulder definitely seems to increase the chances of making mistakes. I've experienced that in the past, myself. However, I feel like I've been doing this long enough that it's not as much of an issue as it used to be. And sure, it can be scary... I'm effectively exposing my abilities to the world for all to see and judge. But I'm fine with that. I've come to realize that we're all human. We all make mistakes. And very few of us developers are actually as skilled as I wish I was. I truly believe this will be an excellent learning experience.
|
|
|
|
|
It´s not about making mistakes, it´s just a constant annoyance
|
|
|
|
|
You'll do much better as a developer if you can work past that issue. 
|
|
|
|
|
I'm with others on this. Unlike gaming, where most of what happens is on the screen, when writing software most of what happens is between my ears. Just watching the screen when I'm coding wouldn't be much more interesting than watching paint dry.
However, I've been wrong about what kinds of things people want to watch before, so I say do like you've done.. give it a try and see if there's any interest.
We can program with only 1's, but if all you've got are zeros, you've got nothing.
|
|
|
|
|
DoubleFine do the "Amnesia Fortnight".
Yes it's game development - but it gives quite an insight to how it all pulls together, from concept to "final" product. You do get live streams of some of the coding too (as multiple projects are all developing at once).
|
|
|
|
|
I think it can work.
I am a trainer, and I often make demo where I code and ask questions at the same time in live, so I make them aware of design problems they might come to. (Sometimes, they find cleaner solution than me)
Most of the time, everybody is very attentive.
Sometimes I do it on the very database they are using for the program they are developing. (I almost never use stupid training example you can find in books, always real use case)
The interactivity is what make it interesting, not the fact that you are coding.
However, they ask a lot of question that's why they are interested, and I think it is essential they can communicate by chat or speak during your live.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the positive input and advice, Nicolas. I'm still experimenting with the idea and will let you know when I've figured out how to do it successfully.
|
|
|
|
|
Keith Richard's Life, only read a little of it so far but fascinating book...everything you wanted to know but were afraid to ask. 
Went to pick up some books on Python and Linux/Ubuntu bur the Python book was $70 and I was too cheap and there were no good Linux/Ubuntu books. We live in a small southern town where there are no real book stores so we had to drive 45 mins. to Hilton Head where there's a Barnes and Nobel but evidently the ritzy titsy folk over there don't read those kind of books because the selection was almost nil, but you could buy 142 versions of the bible or 642 books on how to take care of your finances.
|
|
|
|
|
I've had real good luck using www.biblio.com, but mainly for older publications (out of print stuff). In recent years Amazon has been often able to beat their pricing, but if you can wait for one their often X% off email offers, they become a good option. The books can come from any where in the world, so you may have to wait a few weeks to receive it at times.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the link. I've been getting used books off Amazon the last few times I've ordered they are cheap and although some are an edition older they still pertain to what I'm doing. Same with software, I got TurboCAD for $17 as opposed to $100 because it was Version 18 and they are up to 20 but for what I needed it works just fine.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
