|
I guess you won't like the atmosphere here either. We can be quite serious and quite humorous at the same time. There's also a large contingent here who don't suffer fools. Quite frankly, I'm shocked that you haven't been voted out of existence based on your childish behavior in this post alone. The silliness of the Lounge denizens has been a fixture of the site for longer than you've been a member, so telling said denizens to shove off and take their banter elsewhere isn't going to make a difference. I, along with many others, come to this site for the combination of technical expertise and general goofiness of our fellow members. If that isn't the kind of community that you're looking for, you may want to keep looking (in order to keep yourself happier). If you're willing/eager to participate with the understanding that this is the kind of community you're part of, then be welcome.
|
|
|
|
|
Right, and that's fine, sometimes.
This is the problem, your childish nature, I love that stuff too, but, you REALLY need to know when, and how, and with whom it's okay.
Btw, I've made a few lounge post, and had perfectly serious conversations with none of this nonsense, we even GOT TO KNOW EACH OTHER, and THEN, made a few jokes, etc,. (That's the lounge I thought I was posting in, not this 12 year old troll factory.)
I might have been okay with a few jokes, had the topic actually gotten more serious responses, but, right off the bat, you were sh*ting on me, and my topic. (Frankly, it p*ssed me off, and I went into troll mode myself.)
I think you guys are misjudging me, and I can't possibly misjudge you, because you've presented nothing but false faces, I don't even know the real you. (Who was trolling, who was serious, I don't know, I don't you ppl well enough to tell the difference.)
|
|
|
|
|
You must be thinking of someone else. I didn't lock horns with you until you got nasty with folks having a little fun. There was, as far as I could tell, no ill will from anyone until you created it with your belligerent responses. Heck, if it weren't for that, I might not have become involved in the conversation at all, though Mick's joke about Americans might have drawn me in anyway. But I certainly wouldn't have engaged with you!
Getting p*ssed off because your rant didn't bring fellow ranters is quite childish (funny how all these things you accuse me of represent your own behavior, rather than mine). And it's no way to get to know people. As to knowing the "real me", I use my real name and I've tried today to talk you down from the acts of pure jackassery that you've been performing, without any appreciation for my efforts. Ah well, too much to expect from a troll, I guess.
|
|
|
|
|
But, trolling isn't nice... 
It's like you walked up, smacked me in the face, and expect me to be f*cking gracious about it. 
You people live in a fantasy world.
|
|
|
|
|
Joe_Dert wrote: You people live in a fantasy world
No, I think that's the marketing/sales people you're thinking about.
If your neighbours don't listen to The Ramones, turn it up real loud so they can.
“We didn't have a positive song until we wrote 'Now I Wanna Sniff Some Glue!'” ― Dee Dee Ramone
"The Democrats want my guns and the Republicans want my porno mags and I ain't giving up either" - Joey Ramone
|
|
|
|
|
Joe_Dert wrote: But, trolling isn't nice...
Exactly. So why have you been doing it?
Joe_Dert wrote: It's like you walked up, smacked me in the face, and expect me to be f*cking
gracious about it.
Too bad you completely ignore the fact that I did no such thing, virtually or otherwise.
Joe_Dert wrote: You people live in a fantasy world.
No, I live in the real world. Sounds like you need to get your meds adjusted.
|
|
|
|
|
I think you need to reexamine the situation.
I wrote a serious post, posed serious question, and was seeking serious advice. (END OF STORY!)
If you want to claim that I'm a troll because I asked a TOUGH question, then, you're a moron.
I'm sorry, but sometimes you have to discuss tough issues, it happens, deal with it.
If my question seemed inflammatory to you, again, that's your fault, you're "projecting", I had no ill intentions, whatsoever. (Quite the opposite, actually, to me, it's a question of proper etiquette, and nothing more.)
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I'm not a moron. I did not claim you were a troll because of your question. I claimed you were a troll (a claim which you agreed with, thank you) because of your attitude toward the people who had a light-hearted attitude. Sometimes that happens, deal with it.
Again with the "projecting".  In case I haven't said it before, let me be clear. I did not (and still do not) give a sh*t about your question. If you believe I did, you're mistaking me for someone else (or you yourself are a "moron" and are "projecting" that on me). If you expect to have everyone be serious just because you were, you're in the wrong place and going troll because folks don't want to be serious when you want them to is a breach of etiquette itself.
Now, I am an adult and as such have other and better things to do than continue with this discussion, as I'm nearly certain that you're only going to continue to whine about how mean I am and how horrible the other members of CP are for failing to put on straight faces at your whim. So, how about we call it a day? You go your way thinking I'm an a**hole and a moron and I'll go mine knowing that you're wrong. Cheers.
|
|
|
|
|
Are you sure that English is your native language? You sure missed the joke there.
Use the best guess
|
|
|
|
|
Are you sure that you guys understand the difference between grammar complaints, and my complaints which are completely different?
I don't care if you speak broken English, or perfect English, I do care, when you start attacking me, and harassing me, and making new accounts just to troll me, and down vote my account(questions\topics\etc), etc,.
Do try to keep up with the conversation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now, let me put this into perspective for you. (My perspective.)
----
Let's pretend to be a certain way towards a guy who DOESN'T know us at ALL.
And when he believes that our personalities are indeed what we present them to be, we'll all laugh.
Yeah, that's trolling 101, it was never funny, ever, it's always been stupid, and annoying.
And frankly, seeing as I don't know you, I have to assume that however you present yourself to me, is indeed your REAL personality.
This sort of trolling will never be funny to the person being trolled, EVER, because he believes you're an a**hole. (And, you've proven that assumption to quite correct, all of you, be ashamed.)
|
|
|
|
|
I think your perspective is valid.
However, you should also consider context and the context is The Lounge.
If you're new to this site then I must warn you this is where the trolls hang out.
|
|
|
|
|
I wasn't aware of that. (I knew it was sort of a "general" chat.)
Btw, I've had serious conversations in the lounge, it's true, look it up.
(They should definitely add troll warnings to the description, it said, come, relax, talk about what's on your mind, no one mentioned this cluster f*ck. Is that all part of the show?)
:P
|
|
|
|
|
In general be patient.
There are some pretty awesome non-English speakers on here. FFS, them Geordies need someone to listen to them.
Reality is an illusion caused by a lack of alcohol
|
|
|
|
|
That's it ahm gannin for t'get me ganzie.
“Education is not the piling on of learning, information, data, facts, skills, or abilities - that's training or instruction - but is rather making visible what is hidden as a seed”
“One of the greatest problems of our time is that many are schooled but few are educated”
Sir Thomas More (1478 – 1535)
|
|
|
|
|
I think a little context might be helpful for people to understand it completely. A link to the relevant discussion, please?
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote: A link to the relevant discussion, please?
I think he got into an argument with S A Kryukov 
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I did.
He's abrasive, he fails to read\understand topics, and makes ridiculous suggestions that generally have nothing to do with any sort of actual solution.
But, he had little to do with this topic, he's a minor fraction of the problem.
|
|
|
|
|
Why didn't you say so!
I have gotten into it with SAK over language issues (see here).
He is very... *searches for kind phrasing*... set in his opinions.
In any event, he's a great help to the site... I'd just let him keep doing his thing.
|
|
|
|
|
AspDotNetDev wrote: He is very... *searches for kind phrasing*... set in his opinions.
I read this as: "He is a major sunshine"
If you think you can do a thing or think you can't do a thing, you're right - Henry Ford
Emmanuel Medina Lopez
|
|
|
|
|
I didn't say that. But I didn't not say that either. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joe_Dert wrote: He's abrasive, he fails to read\understand topics, and makes ridiculous
suggestions that generally have nothing to do with any sort of actual solution.
Presuming all that is true - what does any of that have to do with a lack of language comprehension?
|
|
|
|
|
Quote:
Presuming all that is true - what does any of that have to do with a lack of language comprehension?
Well, I don't know, perhaps the part where he either FAILED to READ the topic, or, FAILED to UNDERSTAND it... (I'm guessing he failed to understand it, based on his comments.)
For example: I stated that I wrote a piece of code on the spot. (Here's a quick transcript.)
Quote:
I'm trying to figure out how to do "X" task. // Rephrased, obviously.
The best I can figure, is something like.
// CODE EXAMPLE - HERE (Snipped for brevity.)
(I typed this up here, I don't even know if that would compile, so, don't mind that.)
His response contained the following.
Quote:
I don't see a point in the code you show. If you found it on the Web, it does not mean it makes a lot of sense. I think you can take it seriously and simply write all the wrapper code you need by yourself.
So, I'm a code thief, and I need to take my programming more seriously and write my own code....
GTFO
Quote: I cannot see how could we help as you did not explain your ultimate goals.
Now, this is my favorite part. (The topic title, and the topic itself both clearly explained my goal.)
I was trying to create a C# style static using C++\CLI, it needed to be consumed by C#, and LOOK just like a normal C# static class in intellisense, etc,. (Lacking the knowledge of how to properly accomplish the task, and being unable to find any clues online, I asked, which led to this conversation.)
|
|
|
|
|
Joe_Dert wrote: Well, I don't know, perhaps the part where he either FAILED to READ the topic,
or, FAILED to UNDERSTAND it
I read your entire response. I see nothing that suggests a language problem.
Failure to understand your response doesn't mean that the person would understand it if their language comprehension was better.
Nor does one case (individual) make a rule.
Joe_Dert wrote: So, I'm a code thief, and I need to take my programming more seriously and write
my own code....
Neither the individuals statement nor your response has anything to do with comprehension.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
