|
Even Kirk does not talk computers to death which he just could switch off. That's reserved for those which are inaccessible and insist to follow their buggy programs.
At least artificial intelligence already is superior to natural stupidity
|
|
|
|
|
Add
6. The numeric digit what you feel Dalek Dave usually votes for your posts.
|
|
|
|
|
You forgot a special character if you want passwords.
Most of them wouldn't work though. _ is about it, i think.
V.
|
|
|
|
|
MehGerbil wrote: intValReCoRDCouNT1rjt1998
In which year variable was created.
Regards,
Hiren.
-"I don't know, I don't care, and it doesn't make any difference".
|
|
|
|
|
Let's reduce it to the two digit year to save space.
After all, including the century digits is redundant.

|
|
|
|
|
^ I think I've identified our resident century digit hater.
|
|
|
|
|
Let's reduce it to the two digit year to save space.
That's what they said before they knew better...
|
|
|
|
|
I'll be dead long before it's a problem.
Which is my way of saying it isn't my problem.
That is also a great way to view the environment (1).
NOTES
----------------------------------------------
1: Please don't tell Lucy Lawless that I wrote that.
|
|
|
|
|
Will it not lead to the Y0.1K problem, like the Year 2000 problem?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two man enter, one man leave.
"the meat from that butcher is just the dogs danglies, absolutely amazing cuts of beef." - DaveAuld (2011) "No, that is just the earthly manifestation of the Great God Retardon." - Nagy Vilmos (2011)
"It is the celestial scrotum of good luck!" - Nagy Vilmos (2011)
"But you probably have the smoothest scrotum of any grown man" - Pete O'Hanlon (2012)
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'd like to add a prefix m_ for member variables:
m_intValReCoRDCouNT1rjt
to add a bit more security we should make the naming longer - one never knows, the name might already been taken.
|
|
|
|
|
You are hereby officially disowned by the CodeProject community. We do not know you nor do we want to know you. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
I wish this was the only thing making me a dick.
I'd be in much better shape.
|
|
|
|
|
I can go with 1, 2, 4, and five - silly, but I can imagine a tortured, past-plagued mind coming up with perfectly fine reasons.
I'm curious, though, what's the motivation behind the casing rule of 3. They didn't want to shell out for an obfuscator?
|
|
|
|
|
peterchen wrote: I'm curious, though, what's the motivation behind the casing rule of 3.
You must be one of those VB guys I'm always hearing about...
|
|
|
|
|
So does this sum up the current situation?
1. Create minimalist UI (overrated and patronising IMO) with monochrome and all caps tool windows.
2. Respond to massive negative feedback and add back some colour but then make menu all caps instead.
3. Respond to massive negative feedback, stick with all caps menu to provide “structure” and align with other MS products (but not all) and promise to add an option to turn off all caps (already provided independently by registry hack or add-in).
4. Drop desktop dev options from VS Express line and make Metro-only.
5. Respond to massive negative feedback by announcing VS Express Desktop for C#, VB, C++.
6. Remove C++ compiler from Windows SDK.
7. Respond to massive negative feedback by announcing VS Express Desktop which will include the C++ compiler.
8. Drop XP targeting for native code even though 30% of businesses are still on XP and native developer customers of MS have far too many customers who are still on XP, so can’t move to C++ 11 (latest standard).
9. Respond to massive negative feedback by promising to deliver XP support post-RTM (which might mean VS 2014 of course).
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
Sums it up so far. It's like an episode of Soap.
"Confused? You will be.
|
|
|
|
|
I noticed it was also a remarkably short period of time between the Metro-only VS Express announcement and the desktop one. Makes me think it was waiting in the wings all along and they were testing what would float.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
The confusing part being Microsoft listening to feedback?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wasn't that a great series?
|
|
|
|
|
Well, for once they listen to their user base !! !
Watched code never compiles.
|
|
|
|