|
Is this gonna be a standup fight, sir, or another bughunt?
Jeeez... it's not a bug, it's a feature...
(yes|no|maybe)*
|
|
|
|
|
...only if you get it in the manual.
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
|
|
|
|
|
Name two movies starring Sean Connery where another actor in the same movie does a Sean Connery impersonation.
|
|
|
|
|
I'd have a stab at Highlander.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done.
Drink. Get drunk. Fall over - P O'H
OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre
I cannot live by bread alone. Bacon and ketchup are needed as well. - Trollslayer
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb - they're often *students*, for heaven's sake - Terry Pratchett
|
|
|
|
|
Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade?
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
Ooh 'eck I'm trying to remember the name, he plays the guy who escaped from Alcatraz, Nick Cage, group of Navy Seals try to blow up San Francisco.., the Presido Affair (He plays a Navy Cop, pre NCIS!)followed by the line "For that I will use my left thumb, the right is too strong for you" great line as he floor a 6 foot odd police man! So the Presido Affair &the Nick Cage movie!
Glenn
Remembered it The Rock, man I need a life!
modified 15-Jun-12 12:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
V.
|
|
|
|
|
Note to self I not sure look at previous comments, didn't think I would be the only one!
|
|
|
|
|
Actually everyone knew, but `played` around it. I just five the one with the correct answer.
It´s actually very nice that people play along a little and don´t give the answer too fast
V.
|
|
|
|
|
I'd like to recommend some new variable namig standards.
For this tutorial I'll use an example pulled from one of my recent projects.
intValReCoRDCouNT1rjt
1: The first 3 letters are the type.
2: The second 3 letters are if it's a reference or value type.
3: The third set of letters - all capital letters (except for vowels) - is the name.
4: The numeric digit is what I usually vote on all of Dalek Dave's posts.
5: My initials (so we know what programmer made the variable).
The great thing about these variable names is that they also work well as passwords.
I call it Code Project Notation.
|
|
|
|
|
That reminds me of something:
Each player gets six cards, except for the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.
The second card is turned up, except on Tuesdays.
Two jacks are a "half-fizzbin".
If you have a half-fizzbin:
a third jack is a "shralk" and results in disqualification;
one wants a king and a deuce, except at night, when one wants a queen and a four;
if a king had been dealt, the player would get another card, except when it is dark, in which case he'd have to give it back.
The top hand is a "royal fizzbin", but the odds against getting one are said to be "astronomical".
At least artificial intelligence already is superior to natural stupidity
|
|
|
|
|
Yet again proving how knowledge of Star Trek can be invaluable in real life
|
|
|
|
|
Sure. I usually solve problems by wrapping them up in a warp field and keeping the antimatter contained. I only wish I had Kirk's ability to talk computers to death.
At least artificial intelligence already is superior to natural stupidity
|
|
|
|
|
But...wouldn't reversing the polarity be easier?
|
|
|
|
|
Even Kirk does not talk computers to death which he just could switch off. That's reserved for those which are inaccessible and insist to follow their buggy programs.
At least artificial intelligence already is superior to natural stupidity
|
|
|
|
|
Add
6. The numeric digit what you feel Dalek Dave usually votes for your posts.
|
|
|
|
|
You forgot a special character if you want passwords.
Most of them wouldn't work though. _ is about it, i think.
V.
|
|
|
|
|
MehGerbil wrote: intValReCoRDCouNT1rjt1998
In which year variable was created.
Regards,
Hiren.
-"I don't know, I don't care, and it doesn't make any difference".
|
|
|
|
|
Let's reduce it to the two digit year to save space.
After all, including the century digits is redundant.

|
|
|
|
|
^ I think I've identified our resident century digit hater.
|
|
|
|
|
Let's reduce it to the two digit year to save space.
That's what they said before they knew better...
|
|
|
|
|
I'll be dead long before it's a problem.
Which is my way of saying it isn't my problem.
That is also a great way to view the environment (1).
NOTES
----------------------------------------------
1: Please don't tell Lucy Lawless that I wrote that.
|
|
|
|
|
Will it not lead to the Y0.1K problem, like the Year 2000 problem?
|
|
|
|
|