|
To correct my previous question:
Should I take it that you're available for work as a hit man?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Wallace wrote: hit man
*sings* Watch out for the hitman... dum dum dum dum... da dum dum da dum dum da...
DAMN YOU!!
|
|
|
|
|
_Damian S_ wrote: *sings* Watch out for the hitman... dum dum dum dum... da dum dum da dum dum da...DAMN YOU!!
Just be thankful I didn't mention Boney M.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
ROFL...
Now I have a mashup of Brown girl in the ring and By the rivers of Babylon playing over in my head... with hitman providing the beat... Kill me now...
|
|
|
|
|
|
I was just talking to a colleague and I was just wondering how his day was going, and his response was:
"abc needs a punch in the face"
With abc being the product we work with.
And ya know what, I think that is now my favorite altenative to the forum topics "abc sucks". Well, it made me laugh anyway.
My current two are:
- Excel spreadsheets need a punch in the face
- VB.Net needs a punch in the face
|
|
|
|
|
For amusement[^]
(although how amusing I leave up to the reader!)
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Dalek Dave wrote: (although how amusing I leave up to the reader!)
As I think everyone will agree with me "About as amusing as a kick in knackers".
But in more fun news!
Google "Fatty Brown" (with quotes) and see who got the #1 slot.
|
|
|
|
|
Tres bien, mon capitan!
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Recursive post. Google "Tres bien, mon capitan" with quotes.
|
|
|
|
|
How weird?
And yet satisfyingly ironic.
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Definitely written by someone without a grasp of semi-advanced physics. Better title would be 10 greatest misunderstandings of relativity and quantum physics.
I can imagine the sinking feeling one would have after ordering my book,
only to find a laughably ridiculous theory with demented logic once the book arrives - Mark McCutcheon
|
|
|
|
|
Andy Brummer wrote: Better title would be 10 greatest misunderstandings of relativity and quantum physics.
Precisely the same words went through my head.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Wallace wrote: Precisely the same words went through my head.
Quantum Dualism?
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Dalek Dave wrote: Quantum Dualism?
I think what happened is that I was reading the page, a few quanta of my consciousness also and dually existed at the time when Andy was reading the same page, so my thoughts from his future became his thoughts in my past, or his present.
Happens all the time. Literally all the time.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
And I was all set to post a rant about #10 being especially egregious for using a GR graphic when talking about something that is only present in one representation of SR (and not the one generally used in college level physics classes now)...
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
I have just read a review of VS2010 Professional in a Magazine (PCPRO) their conclusion is:
Overall, this is a good update to an already excellent IDE. The addition of F# is interesting even though, in its current form, its development tools are basic. The long-overdue Silverlight designer and the improved editing and code navigation features are well worth the price of an upgrade.
There have been several discussions in The Lounge about VS2010 and I don't remember anyone mentioning the 'Silverlight designer'. In any event I am not currently doing very much WPF, just playing, and no Silverlight at all. It therefore seems to me that the editor improvements would need to be fairly enormous to warrant my upgrading at the moment.
Are the improvements that good?
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
|
|
|
|
|
Only if you've planned to target .Net 4 (as my team do), otherwise, I don't think so.
|
|
|
|
|
Best improvement for me has been the ability that you can now zoom in on the editor 
I doubt it. If it isn't intuitive then we need to fix it. - Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Ed.Poore wrote: you can now zoom in on the editor
A much cheaper alternative is to lean forward.
|
|
|
|
|
Not if you consider the cost of paying the ophthalmologist.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think you can afford NOT to see the ophthalmologist!
|
|
|
|
|
If you don't see your ophthalmologist, you should see your ophthalmologist?
|
|
|
|
|
Not really[^] 
I doubt it. If it isn't intuitive then we need to fix it. - Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Ed.Poore wrote: Not really[^]
*gack!*
I'm pretty sure my niece designed that page. It uses her colour scheme.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
