|
A noble read was it?
If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
ah, mixing puns and plays on words.
Noble, no bell, nobel.
The jig is "up". Got it.
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
jmaida wrote: Got it.
Not quite.
Helium is classified as one of the noble gasses.
If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
I know. I get it.
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
He stormed off saying he'd walk to the edge of the earth to prove me wrong.
I'm sure he'll come around, eventually.
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
If the world is flat, cats would have pushed everything off it by now.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
A couple of years ago (UK TV show) "Have I got news for you" covered an event the Flat Earthers were running. It was being streamed worldwide in what they advertised as a "Global event."
Oops.
|
|
|
|
|
"There are flat earthers everywhere. We are all around the world!"
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
The scientific term is Platagaians.
That is what I call all the PhD folks I deal with that ignore projections and coordinate systems. They all over the earth!
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 495 3/6
⬛⬛🟨⬛⬛
🟨🟩⬛⬛🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 495 X/6
🟨🟨⬛⬛⬛
⬛🟩🟩⬛🟩
⬛🟩🟩⬛🟩
⬛🟩🟩⬛🟩
⬛🟩🟩⬛🟩
🟩🟩🟩⬛🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 495 X/6
⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜
⬜🟨🟨⬜⬜
🟨🟨🟩⬜🟩
⬜🟩🟩⬜🟩
⬜🟩🟩⬜🟩
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
Yikes 2 in a row i have missed getting sloppy
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
Not seeing you for many days, sir. Hope everything is fine, and you are in good health, sir.
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 495 4/6
🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜
⬜🟩⬜🟩🟩
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
I was lucky - I still had 4 possibles left for that guess ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 495 3/6
🟩🟨🟨⬛⬛
🟩🟩🟩⬛⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 495 X/6
🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜🟨🟨
🟨🟩⬜⬜🟩
⬜🟩🟩⬜🟩
⬜🟩🟩⬜🟩
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 495 3/6
🟩🟨🟨⬜⬜
🟩⬜🟨🟩⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
could've been a two if I hadn't made a mistake
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming “Wow! What a Ride!" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 495 6/6*
⬜🟩⬜⬜⬜
⬜🟩🟩⬜⬜
⬜🟩🟩⬜🟩
⬜🟩🟩⬜🟩
🟩🟩🟩⬜🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Just made it!
Happiness will never come to those who fail to appreciate what they already have. -Anon
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 495 6/6
🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜
🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜🟨🟨⬜⬜
🟩⬜🟨🟩⬜
🟩⬜⬜🟩🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 495 2/6
⬛⬛🟨🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 495 X/6*
⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜
⬜🟨🟨⬜⬜
⬜🟩🟩⬜🟩
⬜🟩🟩⬜🟩
⬜🟩🟩🟨🟩
🟩🟩🟩⬜🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Just needed to rant and to open for discussion. MS - Monopoly split, AT&T - Monopoly split, MCI/Worldcom - Monopoly split, Google - Monopoly...... Ect. We can go on and on about what has been taken down and split. Now I ask why is it that JavaScript is the ONLY language left on most browsers for DOM access? Why can't we use C, C-script, C#, EMCA-XXX, CGI, PHP, or any other? MS was slapped with lawsuit when they added classes to Java. I can understand why they won't touch JavaScript/DOM. But please, as new frameworks and Web Technologies rise, we need to ALWAYS turn from the network choice of language that we use, back to JavaScript in order to access DOM elements. We are forced to use JavaScript, oh and only JavaScript to access DOM. Mind you there are DOM Implementations, APIs and other AddOns, but they are just that, AddOns. If you want to access you have to use JavaScript, or as other frameworks call it, an interop with JavaScript. WHY? 
|
|
|
|
|
All Web pages have to use an agreed protocol so they can be interpreted by any/all browsers. For better or worse, this is html with various predefined sections (css, JavaSript, etc.).
You are free to add any desired section to the html page, using any possible language, but bear in mind that browsers will not know how to interpret it.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Because JavaScript is a cross-browser/device supported language, not a monopoly.
It seems to me that you're also mixing apples and oranges. The language (for example, a "thin" transpiler like TypeScript) vs. DOM element access, are two different things.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for your input. Yes I am aware that it is a cross-browser/device supported language, but why not add one more? If I do a project with a framework in c#, I have to use an interop to get to DOM. If I use another framework, I have to always go back to JS. Seems a limitation rather than having the frameworks access DOM directly.
It may seem that I have apples and oranges, but if we want to keep cross-browser/device functionality as you speak for one language applied to devices itself, then let us all use only Linux, or only Apple, or only PC. That is a whole different battle, but the heart of it all is the same. I like Apple, I use Apple; I like PC, I use PC. On that thought, for this example only, I like C# and am using a framework for developing a webapp, I use C#, but I also have to include JS. I am forced to include JS for DOM. So, I have to get another nuget, or addon, or plugin, or interop to have my C# code communicate with JS which then communicates with DOM and then DOM through JS give the desired response to my C# request/call/etc. What if I want to use C++, or the famous python? Plugins, nuget, addons galore. All browsers if they want to truly be cross/multi-platform should also be cross/multi language APIs to allow DOM access to what you are developing. Then you would be platform AND language independent thus giving the freedom to develop apps within the language that you choose.
|
|
|
|