|
|
I can't wait! 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm, you sound like a procrastinator 
|
|
|
|
|
I'm so lazy that I even put off procrastination!
|
|
|
|
|
|
One is waiting for the doctor person.
|
|
|
|
|
Disclaimer: This is not intended as a programming question. I'm looking for experience and/or references to resources. I tried asking this question in Q&A and wasn't successful posting it, as any keyword I specified was rejected. Before you condemn me for asking here, I have searched on both Microsoft Docs[^] and general Googling with little or no success.
I have a Windows shell extension for an in-house diagnostic tool. Under Windows 11, the context menu entry it supplies is relegated to the "Show more options" submenu in Explorer. Naturally, I'd like to make my context menu entry a 1st class citizen. There is exactly one example that purports to demonstrate how to do this, and the comments indicate that it doesn't work. Microsoft's documentation isn't coherent on the subject. The gist of it seems to be that your application needs to be packaged like a UWP app, which requires a signing certificate and a whole lot of other bric-a-brac. By their own admission, VS2019 doesn't include the "tooling" to make this easy.
Has anyone done this, or do they have any suggestions?
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary R. Wheeler wrote: By their own admission, VS2019 doesn't include the "tooling" to make this easy
As long as you have the current Windows SDK[^]. Everything you need is in there... including MakeAppx and SignTool.
|
|
|
|
|
An optimist believes we live in the best of all worlds.
A pessimist believed we live in the best of all worlds.
Not sure who I stole this one from.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Alternate second line: Yes, I'm afraid so.
Another optimist/pessimist:
Optimist: The bottle is still half full.
Pessimist: It is half empty already.
Optimist: Yes, but I am half full, too!
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Optimist: The bottle is still half full.
Pessimist: It is half empty already.
The engineer asks “Are we filling it or emptying it?”
If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
The quantum computerist answers: Yes.
|
|
|
|
|
If you put a quantum computer into a cage, will you then know if it has produced an answer?
|
|
|
|
|
Only if the cat dies...
If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
YES. THIS
That's been the gist of my reply to this question for about 30 years now.
It never ceases to amuse me how bent out of shape some people get if you refuse to answer until they do.
Seems to shut them up though when you talk about being precisely at the mid-point between work and home.
At that stage, the question I've asked stops seeming so trivial 
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew Dennis wrote: Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
These flying bananas you refer to ... I have heard about people throwing rotten tomatoes at people they don't like, but get a similar effect from flinging bananas at them, I guess would require really rotten bananas.
|
|
|
|
|
The pessimist: “It cannot get worse than this”.
The optimist: “Yes, it can”.
Mircea
|
|
|
|
|
When it can't possibly get any worse, even the pessimist fails.
|
|
|
|
|
An optimist invented the airplane.
A pessimist invented the parachute.
>64
Some days the dragon wins. Suck it up.
|
|
|
|
|
Nice. 
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew Dennis wrote: An optimist believes we live in the best of all worlds.
If this is the best of all worlds that's plenty of reason to become a pessimist 
|
|
|
|
|
An optimist believes that we live in the best of all possible worlds. A pessimist fears that this is true. 
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
That is not the real issue. The question is whether you can get away with stating that two plus two make five.
|
|
|
|
|
A literalist takes things literally.
A kleptomaniac takes things, literally.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
