|
The Disney Afternoon Studio Chorus - Chip 'N' Dale's Rescue Rangers Theme Song[^]
During my Christmas break I found this Disney album on Spotify.
It features some great tracks from my youth, the themes of Duck Tales, Gummi Bears, Tale Spin and Rescue Rangers.
I was actually searching for the Gummi Bears theme as I heard it in a piano medley by Lara6683 (can't really remember where or which, I think this one Another Mega Medley - YouTube[^]).
So needless to say I gave them a listen and then they turned out the be just great tracks with more to them than the minute you see on TV 
Especially the Rescue Rangers theme got stuck in my head, it has some strong 80's vibes and has been on repeat since.
So the first SOTW of the year is a bit of nostalgia disguised as this awesome song 
|
|
|
|
|
I remember the cartoon and also had the NES game
|
|
|
|
|
A friend of my cousin had the NES game.
A friend of mine had Duck Tales.
I had Tale Spin.
Rented Darkwing Duck at some point.
Haven't finished any of them as we were like six years old and we sucked 
I think I came pretty darn close with Tale Spin though.
Good old times 
|
|
|
|
|
Very catchy!
Here's a tune I shared over the holiday. It's from a group I'd never heard of, and more of the songs on that playlist are worthy of perusal: YOU MAN - "BIRDCAGE"
|
|
|
|
|
First second: younger Tiffani Thiessen in short tank top.
Second second: I've upvoted.
Music is awesome too, great find 
|
|
|
|
|
Listening through it again: another great! YOU MAN - ALTERED STATES I'm always happy when I come across stuff like this that I've missed in the past!
(Or should I pretend to be a young millennial, and say "...stuff like this that I've missed in the passed?") 
|
|
|
|
|
I've been listening to You Man almost non-stop since yesterday  
|
|
|
|
|
That makes two of us! And yesterday wasn't my first day!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Great song! I've heard several other great Worakls remixes over the years, so they are worth checking out. Here's the one stashed in my library: N'to - Trauma (Worakls Remix). Kind of slow compared to most of my likes, but nice background stuff. Hell, you probably keyed me into them years ago, for all I remember!
|
|
|
|
|
Peter a vicar, could mislead you (11)
"Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming “Wow! What a Ride!" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Let's not beat about the bush, I saw what you did there! 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prevaricate
"It is easy to decipher extraterrestrial signals after deciphering Javascript and VB6 themselves.", ISanti[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
YAUM - well done
"Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming “Wow! What a Ride!" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
I was chasing a "bug" all day. I finally solved it by realizing it wasn't a bug.
The "bug" was this - I was inputting a regular expression, and minimizing it, getting a new, simplified regular expression. Here's the original expressions
(foo|ba[rz])+[A-Z_a-z][A-Z_a-z0-9]*
Here was the expression I was getting out:
(ba[rz][A-Z_a-z]|foo[A-Z_a-z])[0-9A-Z_a-z]*
Notice there's no initial loop like in the original expression - just the loop at the end.
I thought it was wrong. It's not. While it could further be simplified into this:
(ba[rz]|foo)[A-Z_a-z][0-9A-Z_a-z]*
it wasn't actually wrong, which was what I thought the problem was.
Of course that's an equiv regex because foo, bar, and baz would all be matched with [A-Z_a-z][0-9A-Z_a-z]*!
*headdesk*
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
After all these years, RegEx is still Voodoo to me and I don't really grok it. I usually copy regex scripts from the internet and tweak them a little, if needed.
Glad you figured it out.
|
|
|
|
|
It's a very simple functional language. I think the trouble people have with it is the operators are very short.
There's only a few core ones though. The rest is just syntactic sugar/shortcuts for them.
() * and |
that's all you need technically, although expressions would get pretty long.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
I find it a lot easier to write a regex that it is to read it. So - to me - copying from the internet and tweaking it sounds hard compared to writing one.
|
|
|
|
|
relatable
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed, except when I need it, I pull up the reference and grind through what I need.
I wonder if it would be possible to create an alternate language version of regex, one that is more easy for us regular people to work with, but could then be compiled down to a regex expression. Sort of like TypeScript is for JavaScript. Hmmm, sounds like an interesting project....
|
|
|
|
|
I create Regexes using Visual Studio Code, where we can experiment with the regex and get to see the result on the screen. Learnt about the Regex feature of Visual Studio Code in a Youtube video.
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately those tools don't really help me here because of what I'm doing - programmatically simplifying the expression. The whole bug was a brain fart on my part. I knew better. I just wasn't seeing it.
Basically my program was more clever than I was in the moment, and did a simplification I didn't understand at the time.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: The "bug" was this - I was inputting a regular expression
Sounds like a bug alright 
Jamie Zawinski wrote: Some people, when confronted with a problem, think
“I know, I'll use regular expressions.” Now they have two problems.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
