|
For some of it, Pennsylvania requires recycling e-waste, and there are several companies who collect it.
For some other of it, maybe you have a local community college you could donate it to.
After the COVID work-from-home period, I was required to work in the office. I use one PC, one wide monitor, and an inherited ink jet printer in a big airy office, since I am the manager, now. The guys tried to get me to accept a second monitor, but I don't want it. The guy who works for me has my old office, much smaller, with 4 PCs and 4 monitors, and a KVM switch. I tell them I like my life simple.
I used to use the multiple PCs for Linux, various servers of all sorts. But we've moved to the cloud, tech support is so hopelessly dependent on Microsoft, and I am too old to try to change things.
|
|
|
|
|
I side with your wife.
Hoarding is NOT about HOW you acquired things. It's about not getting rid of things!
you have a lot to be grateful for. First, that you could afford those things without selling some of them, etc. And that you have the SPACE to have all of that stuff!
But if you are NOT using it. Have no plans to TRULY use it... Time to get rid of it.
So, here is an easy approach. Take ONE thing a month, that you have NOT USED in a LONG time. Put it in a box. Date the box with the date that YOU ACCEPT it's probably not going to be used ever again. (This says nothing about having "value", this is about taking up space/energy/etc).
Then give your wife permission to toss the boxes on those dates. (This lets you avoid the psychological impact of "loss" by building to it, and not forcing you to go without something).
Also, I would probably put the wife in charge of your Tech Budget money. one of her Strings is removing old stuff BEFORE buying new stuff, or sticking to the protocol. That will give her some control, and she will be able to see progress...
Think of it has HARDWARE DEBT. you are accumulating it without REFACTORING your space!
|
|
|
|
|
IMO, 45 years in this business would mean you'd have a lot more hardware if you truly were a hoarder. Clearly, you already do get rid of stuff occasionally.
Slow Eddie wrote: She intends to put me in a 12' x 10' storage shed in the back yard there, and there won't be enough room for it all.
Any ideas on how to safely dispose of all of th unused equipment?
Avoid that fate by disposing of the wife? 
|
|
|
|
|
I've had gotten rid of quite a bit of the old computer stuff by handing it down the the kids and grandkids. You might also be able to find some use for those old computers. I've got 3 of my old computers used as 'smarts' for our TVs. I like the control and extra features they provide over the builtin smarts that came with the TVs.
Oh, make it a 2 story 12' x 10' shed! 
|
|
|
|
|
Best Buy stores take electronics of most kinds for recycling for free. I think they have a limit of 3 devices per day power customer. So for all your old gear, you could be rid of them safely in around 2 weeks or so.
|
|
|
|
|
When I dispose of old hard drives, I completely disassemble them to get to the platters then use a screwdriver or something to scratch up and bend the platters. Nobody is going to get anything off of a bent, scratched up platter. Plus, when you do this, you end up with a bunch of REALLY powerful little magnets!!
The only thing you need is the appropriate TORX bit (I think a T10 or T15).
|
|
|
|
|
Alternatively I need some sort of branch prediction for reality.
The trouble is I have an analog to digital conversion circuit that is introducing lag into my software.
It's connected to a pressure sensor that's connected eventually to a tube a user breathes into.
In order for me to sample real-time I need to be able to get data continuously at 10 frames a second.
This is supposed to be possible with the device, but something about it is introducing massive lag into my software so it effectively can't even sample at 10 frames a second.
I can sample it on a separate core, but then I'm not getting pressure sensing in lock step with the display readout and that creates problems.
Unless my users were similarly multithreaded, or if I could just predict what their breathing was like just before they did it.
I hate it when something needs to be optimized that isn't something I wrote.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
Some ADCs I dealt with in the dim distant past took forever to take a single sample, but could be put into a "continuous conversion" mode, where they make a sample available in whatever is their natural cycle time. Some even allowed a degree of control over the sample rate.
Can you turn it loose, and just pick a sample from a buffer at your 100mS intervals?
Just a thought from an old fart hardware type.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
I'm trying to fiddle with the continuous mode to see if I can get better performance out of it. Otherwise I may upgrade to a faster and more expensive 24-bit ADC to see if that helps.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
Got it to work - the continuous mode thing was the ticket.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
Good to know I haven't completely lost the thread!
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, I took a nap. I would have said thank you but I was literally already working along toward this end when I happened upon you.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: Alternatively I need some sort of branch prediction for reality.
? [^]
«The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled» Plutarch
|
|
|
|
|
Okay fair, but I was looking for something more reliable if not deterministic. *hides*
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
i use an infinite number of infinite-sided dice to predict reality branching, but, the outcome is unfair 50% of the time, in any one eternity, in any one universe .... which makes me suspicious the dice may be rigged 
«The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled» Plutarch
|
|
|
|
|
And it ha a new feature: if you highlight text on a page, then right click you get a new option "Copy link to highlight" which includes the instructions to go to that highlighted text when you paste into the address bar.
Brilliant! there are times when that would be really helpful - sending someone directly to line 157 of a web page and they get the relevant info directly.
So I thought I'd try it.
And ... it doesn't work in the Lounge because the text of messages is collapsed and it can't find them ... 
(Works in QA though, because they aren't)
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
.. which they seem to achieve through an extension to the URL scheme, as in:
https://examplesite.com/page?param=search#:~:text=word_to_highlight
So :~: is a sort of separator / indicator, and text= is a parameter name. I wonder what other parameters can be passed in this scheme, and also wonder if existing pages will break as a result? I guess not, since the new syntax follows the # marker used to identify a target on the page, and I assume (though have never tried) that :~: is not valid as a target name...
BTW it seems this feature came out in v90 this April..
|
|
|
|
|
|
I just highlight the text and drag it to the address bar, been doing this forever with various browsers.
The less you need, the more you have.
Even a blind squirrel gets a nut...occasionally.
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
In Chrome, that just seems to do a google search on the text?
|
|
|
|
|
|
5teveH wrote: but explaining in simple terms what this means to us - and what we need to do about.
Apparently not simple enough that policitians (and many, many civilians) would understand it correctly... 
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
oh, at least one of the politicians there got it. he went and made a movie about it, even.
|
|
|
|
|
I wonder how much carbon was released making, promoting, distributing and viewing the movie? 
|
|
|
|
|
fgs1963 wrote: I wonder how much carbon was released
45,234,783,325,756.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
