|
Maybe you need to re-read the DEC Alpha history.
Two of my OpenVMS systems are Alpha.
|
|
|
|
|
I only know what I saw in the field (where I was). One of my co-workers would hit all the trade shows, and you could see the Sun people checking the heat output of the Alpha. They could not believe how cool it would run.
I worked at an Air Force base in a support role and lived through the terrible days of the VAX 9000 - let's go after IBM - fiasco. Simultaneously, the midrange systems (VAX 6xxx) kept getting faster and faster, and the software licensing model became a fiasco. The software upgrades were 2x the hardware costs.
My customers finally just gave up. If we had had the Alpha when it was first talking about in the company, I truly believe DEC would still be around.
Charlie Gilley
<italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape...
"Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
|
|
|
|
|
Well, Alpha wasn't completely ignored as I recall. At one time (and I do not presume to tell you stuff you already know) it was possible to buy Alpha-based PC motherboards and run NT4 on them (at the time NT4 was growing massively in popularity). I saw these motherboards and was hopeful for whole new ranges of new Alpha-based NT4 PCs, just like we saw ranges of x86 PCs.
But it didn't happen.
Like so many new technologies, I think it was the old chicken/egg problem. Alpha-based PCs weren't going to take off until there were drivers and application software compiled for Alpha, and no one was going to write NT4 drivers or compile their Windows application code for Alpha until there was a decent hardware base to make it worthwhile.
It seems to me that the very same problem put paid to MIPS and PowerPC NT4 versions and computers based upon them.
Emulation just wasn't fast enough in those days to solve the lack of applications problem, although I seem to recall that the non-x86 NT4 versions did include x86 emulation for apps.
It turned out that x86 hardware was simply good enough.
I wonder if greater Linux maturity would have allowed Alpha, MIPS or PowerPC to do better in the PC marketplace back then. I suspect not. Linux on IBM Power ISA is a thing now, of course, but it's still niche, despite attempts to popularise it.
|
|
|
|
|
True, it was not completely ignored. All I remember is having multiple customers panting for it. The writing was on the wall for the big systems - they were simply not sustainable given the potential performance offered by the new architecture. While all this crap was going on in DEC, Sun was executing it's RISC business plan, and HP was trying to figure out what to do with PA-RISC.
Meanwhile, a few people at Intel noticed that if they didn't start making their processors a hell of a lot faster, they were toast. And intel got to work - so yes, you are correct.
Today I support a DEC manufacturing system running on Charon VAX running on a Windows Server virtual machine. Go figure. 
Charlie Gilley
<italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape...
"Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
|
|
|
|
|
Better question might be: who still uses OpenVMS😂?
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting, I didn't think octal was used for anything.
The less you need, the more you have.
Even a blind squirrel gets a nut...occasionally.
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Hankey wrote: didn't think octal was used for anything
Surely you ment "...anything else except the ubiquitous chmod command" . After having arse bitten a few times one learns to avoid the number of the beast (666) and the number of the aircraft (777). 644 is golden.
Mircea
|
|
|
|
|
Yep you're absolutely right, I had forgot about that.
The less you need, the more you have.
Even a blind squirrel gets a nut...occasionally.
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
I spent a number of years working on UNIVAC systems which used octal extensively. Reading a 500 page system dump printout all in octal was one of the highlights of my early career.
And the reason I needed to wear glasses in my 20s rather than 40s.
|
|
|
|
|
Upvoted because I didn't know whether to give you a trophy, a rose, or just laugh insanely.
|
|
|
|
|
I think option three would be best. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
I used to use octal - a couple of EL34 jobs plugged in nicely in a push pull circuit for my student days power amp.
Oh - wait a minute - is that not what we're talking about? 
|
|
|
|
|
Wow. I've worked in Firefighting Aviation Comms for 15+ years, familiar with the use of Squawk Codes (Transponder codes) and still remember 7600 (lost radio comms) and 7700 (emergency). I just never noticed the lack of 8s and 9s. But now 76 and 77 make a bit more sense (and more likely to stick in this aged nerd brain).
On a different note, I recently saw an update arrive for a python library. It seems that leading zeroes would stuff up its parsing of dotted decimal IP4 addresses. :facepalm:
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Peter_in_2780 wrote: leading zeroes would stuff up its parsing of dotted decimal IP4 addresses.
Surely you mean dotted-octal.
A few years ago I was asked to look into some problems we were having with IPv4 address parsing. There were data quality issues with incoming feeds, such as missing dots and the occasional leading zero. I had to educate my colleagues as to why the behavior of the parser was correct.
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe someone here also uses Teams - specifically the chat tool? With remote access being what it is these days, it's a useful tool, and I collect much information in it. I am now faced with trying to find some older messages with my boss. For the life of me, I cannot figure out a way to export the complete content of the chat *client* session. It's such a needed feature, I am mystified as to why it cannot be done easily.
I have found one blog that has me out doing powershell queries. Really?
wtf MS? Did I miss something obvious. Interestingly, had I used the chat via the browser, the discussion is sort of saved.
Anyone else solve this problem?
Charlie Gilley
<italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape...
"Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
|
|
|
|
|
Yup. Searching a Team chat is abysmal. Exporting a Team chat? Forget it. So stupid. I wish the company I worked for hadn't moved to Teams. We were using Slack. Loved Slack.
|
|
|
|
|
I work for a fortune 500 company that is an all MS shop. I'm sure the corporate data servers have every Teams conversation stored away for nefarious purposes. However, I get a notification in Teams that old messages are removed on a regular basis.
As for an export feature, that probably just wasn't MVP. Wait a few releases.
Bond
Keep all things as simple as possible, but no simpler. -said someone, somewhere
|
|
|
|
|
Teams itself doesn't remove old messages. Those messages are being removed by your IT department to manage the size of the Exchange server (used to store Teams chats).
|
|
|
|
|
What happens in chat, stays in chat.
|
|
|
|
|
Why?
I support some very old products where context can be important. I cannot even easily "select all". It's ridiculous.
Charlie Gilley
<italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape...
"Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
|
|
|
|
|
Same here. Our email auto-deletes after 6 months, even though the company policy on record-keeping allows retention for up to 24. I've lost countless bits of interaction that were important to establish context.
And before someone asks, yes I do manually save emails and attachments separately when I can and I know in advance that I will need the information down the road.
The real pisser in all of this is that Outlook provides for maintaining separate (off-server) archives of email data. Of course, the pinheads in charge have disabled this administratively.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately no.
I happen to have to use Teams in a corporate environment, so I have no access to the exchange server. I took a look at that article earlier this morning.
All I want to be able to do is right mouse click on a contact and select "Save chat session..." - it mystifies me how Microsoft manages to miss the most obvious stuff, and declares success with rounded icons.
Charlie Gilley
<italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape...
"Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
|
|
|
|
|
You may want to upvote/add a request to UserVoice. I was happy when MS responded to my (and others') request to be able to pop out a chat so we could have multiple conversations running at the same time.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
