|
I've always enjoyed them. 
Thanks.
Sorry to see you go
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for this amazing Pandora's box stuff ...
You deserve the highest distinction, with the felicitations of the jury ... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
That was to be expected, they are not called "weak" for nothing 
|
|
|
|
|
sick burn! 
|
|
|
|
|
Are you running this in a debug build? If so, try a release build instead.
Using LINQPad 6, I can reproduce the behaviour you're setting in a debug build for .NET 5.10; toggling the "o+" switch at the bottom-right to switch to release mode returns the behaviour to normal.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Nice catch
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
You know what?
It indeed work in Release build.
First time I see something working significantly differently between build and release in C# for a while I reckon! 
|
|
|
|
|
For anyone wondering why... this is not because the release build is optimized - it is because extra IL is being injected into the debug build for debugging usability reasons.
If you have:
{
var thing1 = new thing1();
var thing2 = new thing2(thing1);
}
On the breakpoint, you would expect to be able to see thing1. But as the garbage collector no longer see any reference to thing1 it can be collected as soon as the constructor of thing2 is done with it (the constructor does not even have to return).
To avoid this the compiler will inject IL to keep the variable "used" until he variable is out of scope seen from C# (or whatever language) - so the closing }.
Not sure how much "optimization" is really done in release. Maybe it is really just a "stop bloating" option - at least when I had to look I found release IL is a lot easier to read than debug IL
|
|
|
|
|
Super Lloyd wrote: hence my recent numerous programming posts
You auditioning for the role that Honey...Witch played until recently ? 
Go for it
«The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled» Plutarch
|
|
|
|
|
competition is fierce!
|
|
|
|
|
There's so many bugs in .net5 that it's not funny anymore.
This is the last one we found that affects us, in something as basic as Directory.GetFiles: .Net Core Directory.GetFiles() operates webDav path · Issue #46723 · dotnet/runtime · GitHub[^]. Still untriaged after eight months.
"Move fast, break things" has its place. The basic runtime for a lot of business applications in the world is not that place.
Luca
The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance. -- Wing Commander IV
En Það Besta Sem Guð Hefur Skapað, Er Nýr Dagur.
(But the best thing God has created, is a New Day.)
-- Sigur Ròs - Viðrar vel til loftárása
|
|
|
|
|
|
Easy one (I hope) to end the month
Safe openers or Christmas novelty (with hats and gifts) or mad or dry biscuits (8)
|
|
|
|
|
You are crackers!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
with all those clues you might as well have mentioned the answer
"I didn't mention the bats - he'd see them soon enough" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
It is my little informed opinion the F-35 Pilot Helmet can be built by private engineers at much lower cost than .4 Million smackaroonies I seek here opinion of same by those more knowledgeable and skilled than myself The abilities of the helmet as far as I know are image presentation and head tracking Perhaps this is a kind of CodeProject X-Prize - Cheerio
PS As near as I can tell it is Google Glass w/ a carbon fiber shell Big Deal As for ruggedization specification fitting development E/M protection etc. FOUR HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS! NONSENSE
modified 1-Oct-21 10:20am.
|
|
|
|
|
Once I got a 'special' book... Herman Wouk's The Caine Mutiny... What was 'special' about the book that it came out from printing without any whitespaces in it...Likeitwaswritteninasinglebreath.
Your writing remembers me the experience of reading in it...
"The only place where Success comes before Work is in the dictionary." Vidal Sassoon, 1928 - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Built? Yes.
Designed, built, tested and maintained with expected lifetimes and enforcing clauses on said lifetimes? Nope. Keep in mind that it's not a Samsung / Crapple phone, which expected volume of sales is in the millions. These are objects sould in the hundreds, maybe.
GCS d--(d-) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
And there is the sales person that has to make a phat commission on it for doing none of the hard work 
Hogan
|
|
|
|
|
Don't forget, there would be no work to do, without the salesman.
Selling an idea, a helmet not yet created, is particularly difficult.
I know, I have had to sell my own software.
ed
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed.
Having worked on many like military projects, the specifications are very stringent. The testing is way beyond what any normal set of electronics would go through. Case in point, a laptop used by any ground unit has to be able to survive under heavy ground fire, flood, minor explosions, and being dragged through country for hundreds of miles (mud, sand, rocks). If a laptop is submitted for testing, they put the thing through these tests and if it fails to function afterwards, the laptop and manufacturer are rejected. That's why these ground unit laptops weigh 6 to 7 kg, are typically slower than an off the shelf model, and costs 10 to 20x more.
"When you are dead, you won't even know that you are dead. It's a pain only felt by others; same thing when you are stupid."
Ignorant - An individual without knowledge, but is willing to learn.
Stupid - An individual without knowledge and is incapable of learning.
Idiot - An individual without knowledge and allows social media to do the thinking for them.
modified 19-Nov-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Honestly I only have experience of testing and validating electronic and electromechanical devices for civillian use in medical, automotive, food processing and high voltage applications, and those tests are already stringent and expensive, especially when designing equipment that has to be shipped worldwidw - which means that it must adhere to the strictest subset.
Considering the combat usage of military equipment and the knowledge I have of military trials (I follow a lot of guntubers) I can only imagine how a combat oriented, wearable, avionic system that has to
1) operate in a wide range of temperatures (from taking air under the desert sun to flying at 40000 feet where the air is COLD);
2) operate under extreme forces of several g in any direction;
3) operate under extreme vibration and shocks;
4) be EM shielded to not be jammed or inteferred with by other equipment;
5) be EM emission compliant to not intefere with other equipment;
6) be built in a way that renders reverse engineering difficult if not impossible in case of captured equipment (delidding chips and covering the board with epoxy or similar, with all the heat dissipation issues);
Well... it is costly, especially considering that it's built in the hundreds, if as many.
GCS d--(d-) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
DonathanH wrote: That's why these ground unit laptops weigh 6 to 7 kg
I'm picturing Apple going out of its way trying to make a MacBook as thin as possible, then placed into a shell like that.
That would make Steve Jobs spin in his grave.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
![Rose | [Rose]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
