|
I bought an AV receiver(Pioneer) long time ago, but it was broken after one year due to some dust falling into the chassis I guess.
Now I get time to work on my home theatre system.
Any recommendation on solid, robust AV receiver?
diligent hands rule....
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't the slightest clue.
EVERYONE I know uses their computer/phone/tablet now to stream movies. The few people that watch movies on their TV do so with smart TVs that are wired to the internet, and have great built in speakers or they get the speaker bar and plug it into their TV.
Good luck with that most ancient of technologies. 
|
|
|
|
|
Message Closed
modified 30-Aug-21 9:14am.
|
|
|
|
|
I think you meant to reply to the OP, and not me.
|
|
|
|
|
I upgraded from a moderate priced Cambridge Audio Topaz SR10 Receiver to an expensive but still considered entry level Hi-End Jadis Orchestra Black Integrated Amplifier and found I was transfixed by the quality of its' Tube sound It made music more musical Below is a link to my system The Cambridge Audio gear on top is now being replaced w/ streaming gear - Cheerio
If you wish to consider tube gear you might examine Black Ice Audio It is considered low priced Then there is Chinese high end audio Some consider them highly and are low in price relatively speaking but seem to offer only low output so you may need efficient speakers
Where I am: Member Photos Discussion Boards[^]
|
|
|
|
|
yes, I will start from entry level! just like playing my computer gadgets!
thanks for the info!
diligent hands rule....
|
|
|
|
|
I pick a budget $ number then check the flyers. Usually I find some monster on sale somewhere ("last year's model"?). Yamaha. Denom. And I ask them to throw in the cables.
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
my entry level budget<= $200.
I have no experience on setting up AV receiver. so I plan to get an used one from eBay to mess around 
diligent hands rule....
|
|
|
|
|
Remember racecar backwards is still racecar.
Racecar upside down is expensive.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
modified 30-Aug-21 9:24am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Another legend gone, there seems to be a rash of them lately. R.I.P.
The less you need, the more you have.
Even a blind squirrel gets a nut...occasionally.
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
RIP Ed Asner and thanks for the laughs! I'll watch another MTM episode tonight ![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.freetls.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
Mircea
|
|
|
|
|
So now Visual Studio 2019 refuses to build any project that you download from the web unless you remove the "mark of the web" from each .resx file.
And you have to do each file one by one. I have an SDK here with about 30 sample projects, and that's a big pain.
EDIT:
I am using this[^] project to find and delete all the alternate data streams that identify the originating zones of all my source files. Yay.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
modified 29-Aug-21 15:06pm.
|
|
|
|
|
So let me get this straight, you're offering a copy of an SDK that has 30 sample projects and providing no link to it until someone repsonds to this Lounge post telling you to take your VS post to: ... (hey, where did the Visual Studio forum go?) ...
Truth be told, VS2010 has always complained about MOTW. But 64-bit VS is on it's way now ... so can't complain about anything modern anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the link I provided is from a 2005 Code Project article.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
could you give me an example for "any project that you download from the web "?
I am interested to have a try to see your methods working
diligent hands rule....
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I posted that a little hastily. I see that not everything you download gets the mark of the web.
I was just frustrated by the inconvenience.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Andrew x64 wrote: am using this[^] project to find and delete all the alternate data streams that identify the originating zones of all my source files. Yay.
Isn't a simpler way to copy the files to a FAT file system (e.g on a USB stick) and back?
|
|
|
|
|
I'll have to say no to that. Using that little program is pretty darn simple. Just browse to the right folder and click select all and delete.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The comment section on that movie is a good summary of the unharmful-but-wrong on the internet...
(A hope you are aware that only mare mortals have to scroll to get those comment - if want to - but we are developers...)
"The only place where Success comes before Work is in the dictionary." Vidal Sassoon, 1928 - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
...that fix 3 bugs, but installs 516 packages...
Who made it?
"The only place where Success comes before Work is in the dictionary." Vidal Sassoon, 1928 - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Adobe?
It can't be MS - you said it fixes three bugs ... 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
But I didn't say how many new bugs it introduces  (I don't know yet)
"The only place where Success comes before Work is in the dictionary." Vidal Sassoon, 1928 - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
The packages are bloatware or, more likely, spyware.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
