|
It seems pretty obvious that the original author was joking. He was probably an academic in a jestful mood.
... such stuff as dreams are made on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Genetically, they're probably only a few tiny percentage points apart.
I was hoping to see that in the article, but there obviously wasn't room in the couple of hundred words they dedicated to it.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
From the following sentence, applying your (hopefully) expert knowledge of the English language what is your understanding...
A master budget is part of an overall organization plan for the next year made up of three components: (1)
the organization goals, (2) the strategic long-range profit plan, and (3) the tactical short-range profit plan.
Now, without applying your knowledge of the subject domain, is it your understanding that the master budget or the organization plan has three components? (pick one)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
UPDATE:
The statement above was extracted from a textbook. (I'll not name the publisher, but it's a large one)
I got the following question in a paper:
True or False?
A master budget consists of (a) organizational goals, (b) strategic long-range profit plan, and (c) tactical short-range profit plan.
My (incorrect) answer was True.
Reason quoted[^]: "The master budget is the tactical short-range profit plan. These three are part of an overall organization plan."
modified 25-Aug-16 4:07am.
|
|
|
|
|
The master budget (which is one part of the overall plan) has the three components.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, that's how I'd read it, too.
|
|
|
|
|
OP updated with the "answer", or rather, my reason for asking the question in the first place.
|
|
|
|
|
It seems these days that any idiot can write a textbook. When I was growing up it was a given that the content would all be correct.
|
|
|
|
|
Not a native English speaker, but the form is "A blabla is made up of". Hence, I'd vote for the blabla. I mean, the budget.
To reference the organization, I'd expect something like "A blabla is part of OOP*, and OOP is made up out of these three components".
*) Overal organization plan
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Is this the latest BS-Bingo winner sentence of your company finance and controlling department ?
|
|
|
|
|
To rephrase slightly:
A master budget, part of an overall organization plan for the next year, made up of three components: (1)
the organization goals, (2) the strategic long-range profit plan, and (3) the tactical short-range profit plan.
By making the organization the sub-clause, you help clarify the overall sentence structure (well, if the word clarify can be used in this context).
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
That's the subject of a sentence but where's the predicate? A master budget did what? Stick the word "is" between "year," and "made" and then you have a sentence.
|
|
|
|
|
MatthysDT wrote: is it your understanding that the master budget or the organization plan has three components?
Neither. Its the year that has three components. They seem to have odd years where you work 
We can program with only 1's, but if all you've got are zeros, you've got nothing.
|
|
|
|
|
If its ambiguous then its poor English .
I read it as Master budget has 3 parts . If the organisation plan had 3 parts and none of those three parts are the master budget . Then presumably the master budget is a component of 1,2 or 3 . In which case why mention it at all? So I definitly read it as the master budget is a part of the overall organisation plan . The master budget has 3 parts......
|
|
|
|
|
The overall organisation plan for the next four quarters* includes a Master Budget, which comprises three main elements:
1. Organization goals
2. A strategic long-range profit plan
3. A tactical short-range profit plan
Context first (the organisation plan), then the topic, then the explanation of the topic. Putting the context in the middle just makes it harder to absorb the hierarchy.
If you have a numbered list of items: never, ever write them as clauses of the same sentence; put each one on its own line (and, in this case, I would expect each item to be a click-able link to an explanation of the item).
* Or "the four quarters starting [month/year]"
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Master Budget, of course...
MatthysDT wrote: part of an overall organization plan for the next year
is an ancillary phrase describing "Master Budget", the sentence then goes on to further detail of what a Master Budget is comprised.
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
modified 24-Aug-16 13:25pm.
|
|
|
|
|
It is entirely incorrect.
1 would not be part of the budget, whereas 2 and 3 most certainly would be. The sentence is incorrectly structured leading to a misunderstanding of the component parts.
It should read:
The master budget is part of an overall organization plan for the next year. Between them they comprise three parts. The overall organization plan contains the organizational goals and the budget contains the strategic long-range profit plan and the tactical short-range profit plan.
|
|
|
|
|
As worded, it is the master budget plan which has three parts. Of those three parts though, 'organization goals' doesn't seem to fit, leading one to think that it should be the organization plan instead. But then, if the budget is part of the organization plan, shouldn't it be one of the three items listed?
The whole sentence is ambiguous, and could be worded much better than it presently is.
|
|
|
|
|
If it still sounds confusing just revise the structure.
Such as:
As part of the overall yearly organization plan, the master budget is comprised of three components:(1) etc...
if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); }
Meus ratio ex fortis machina. Simplicitatis de formae ac munus. -Foothill, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
Will Shoecifer consume your sole?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
My sole? No, that would be totally out of plaice! 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
It cod happen.
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
Grunt! That sounds fishy to me!
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
