|
Quote: You have a larger vocabulary than 85% of Grammarly users.
Clearly not many educated people are using it. 
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't see what's wrong with it? Was it supposed to be future tense or something?
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Jeremy Falcon wrote: I don't see what's wrong with it?
I'm saying that my vocabulary is not that impressive yet it's still better than 85% of users. 
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, totally missed the joke then. 
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
was there a joke? 
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
MAYBE YOU'VE TYPED IN ALL CAPS or used a slightly bigger font?
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: ALL CAPS or used a slightly bigger font?
Those count towards grammar?  Actually, the way our educational system is going you might be on to something. 
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
RyanDev wrote: Those count towards grammar?
No, they only count to a LARGER vocabulary
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's fun.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
May be they meant gnarly.
"It is easy to decipher extraterrestrial signals after deciphering Javascript and VB6 themselves.", ISanti[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Might be that educated people don't need it?
Just a thought.
|
|
|
|
|
Probably. I installed the free version. It is quite interesting. I like how the product works.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Got the same result... english isn't even my first language....
On that note, I have the german vocabulary of a 7 year old... a retarded 7 year old.
Oh the iron E
|
|
|
|
|
 
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Unless things have changed in the past 6-9 months, not many educated people are writing it either.
We have someone who runs press releases through it before distribution to catch errors and it actually suggests changes that make the grammar worse! Best case it entirely misses blatant errors. In the end we hired a proof reader with a brain. 
|
|
|
|
|
RJOberg wrote: it actually suggests changes that make the grammar worse!
I believe it. I've had it do it to me as well. Of course I assumed I must be wrong because I don't pretend to be a grammar genius. That is funny you saw that as well.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
I feel like developing spelling/grammar checks are two tasks that should never be outsourced. All localization should be handled by a team of native speakers lead by a primary school teacher of said language.
Preferably one who isn't afraid to use a ruler like a Catholic school nun. 
|
|
|
|
|
I've just written an Android app to solve a UX problem. (I use the term UX because it is cool and current and gets me instant points as someone in-the-know.)
My app :
1. retrieves your incoming SMS message
2. determine who it is from via your contact list
3. says, "Incoming from <name from="" contact="">" (Text To Speech)
4. reads your SMS message aloud to you (uses TTS - TextToSpeech).
I'm very happy with it because I often send my wife a message as I go out the door from work:
"On my way".
Her response usually takes a bit and I am very disciplined about not looking at my phone at all while driving (which makes me a freak of nature).
She often sends me a quick text, "Hey could you pick up [grocery item] on the way home?"
I never see it.
Now, my app reads the message aloud to me. It works better than I hoped really.
iOS : Super Secure
iOS does not provide an API to get the incoming SMS text body so you cannot do this.
Wow, this seems like an app whose time has come and yet you really can't do this.
This seems to be for security reasons.
I understand that apps can hijack all this stuff, but on Android you have to allow the permission and my app will tell you (upon installation) that it can RECEIVE_SMS.
Technology ain't all it's cracked up to be, ok? I mean the robots are supposed to be taking over and I can't even get my freaking iPhone to read my SMS messages to me. Lame-oh!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Get an Android phone!
And write an article on the App - could be interesting!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I do have an android phone and I will go ahead and write up the article here soon.
The rest of my family have iPhones and I was going to write the app for them but no such luck.
The Android code is quite simple, actually.
Thanks for the interest. I'l try to get it written up soon.
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: write an article on the App
Seconded.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for your interest.
Because a few people have mentioned that it sounds interesting I've fired up the article editor and attempting the first pass. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
