|
Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote: LEARN TO THE BASICS OF CODING BEFORE TRYING THE MORE COMPLEX RTFM
FTFY
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
I am yet to be convinced they have reached the stage that they can actually understand the manual
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
The FM isn't always right, even if there is one. OK, maybe not a manual, but this week I quickly glanced through a book on "Building enterprise applications with windows presentation foundation", and all I found were what read like a high school child gushing about his latest crush[1], and a horribly weak attempt at domain modelling.
[1] E.g: "In my opinion, the most dangerous thing you can do in a database is create stored procedures (SPs) ."
No object is so beautiful that, under certain conditions, it will not look ugly. - Oscar Wilde
|
|
|
|
|
Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote: LEARN TO THE BASICS OF CODING BEFORE TRYING THE MORE COMPLEX
Or grab hoe and shovel, there's always need of it!
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
I use 1TBS
|
|
|
|
|
Don't "SAK", don't "stackoverflow", just redirect them to Q&A. Given the ratio "questions asked on the site" to "questions erroneously asked in the Lounge", we can make a little effort and not bash the lost souls when they happen to post here.
Or, with the very same reason, send them to burn in hell.
|
|
|
|
|
You don't think that a complete lack of effort on his behalf deserves some flak? my guess is that it probably is already in the Q&A and probably Stackoverflow too.
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
Rage wrote: Don't "SAK", don't "stackoverflow",
I'm not: he ignores clear directions as to what he does need to do. If he had posted it at QA, then he'd get a response, but there is clear, bright red, text at the top of this page, and he didn't bother to even read it, much less to try and help himself.
And I'm in a bad mood. 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
You've read the text in small chars in my post, haven't you ?
|
|
|
|
|
Nah: I just copy'n'pasted it into a question site and shoved the result up here, same as normal! 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
someone pointed out that postings like this in the lounge is like accosting the desktop support guy in the toilet about your pc problems
Right person but due to the location you may not get the answer you were hoping for
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
You have found the correct site, but the wrong forum : Try to ask your question here[^].
|
|
|
|
|
You could try turning your computer off and on and see if it's solved! Good luck!
Wout
|
|
|
|
|
You could try turning your computer off and on and see if it's solved! Good luck!
FIFY
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
Member 11258353 wrote: can anybody help me out to resolve this problem.??
Yes.
|
|
|
|
|
0. Windows containing grids that contain combos that scroll with the mousewheel when you meant to scroll the grid!
(I'm talking to you VS2013 Configuration Manager)
1. Windows containing data in grids that cannot be resized, even thought the grid is self-evidently too small for the window size.
(I'm talking to you VS2013 Configuration Manager)
2. Windows that, on change of a combobox value, perform time-consuming changes without confirmation
(I'm talking to you VS2013 Configuration Manager)
* excluding constipation
PooperPig - Coming Soon
|
|
|
|
|
The 2nd and the 3rd one, I agree.
But for the 1st one, I suspect you still had the combo focused when you scrolled. One must always click someplace else inside the grid in order to get the focus off the combo. 
And that's a feature!
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
I miss-spoke (or, more accurately, miss-moaned). It's not a combo in the grid - it is the combo that is the initial focus on the form, that changes on mousewheel, and automatically updates the contents of the grid - which can take a minute or more with our configuration - so really it's 0 and 2 combined - but lists of three are so much more, I dunno, neat?
PooperPig - Coming Soon
|
|
|
|
|
_Maxxx_ wrote:
0. Windows containing grids that contain combos that scroll with the mousewheel when you meant to scroll the grid! |
|
|
|
|
|
_Maxxx_ wrote: I'm talking to you VS2013 Configuration Manager
The dirty laundry of Visual Studio. Some of the worst design cases are found in those less often used VS dialogues.
No object is so beautiful that, under certain conditions, it will not look ugly. - Oscar Wilde
|
|
|
|
|
meow[^] 
<Warning>
May not want to play at work.
</Warning>
Once you lose your pride the rest is easy.
In the end, only three things matter: how much you loved, how gently you lived, and how gracefully you let go of things not meant for you. – Buddha
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
modified 27-Mar-15 6:06am.
|
|
|
|
|
Cat got my tongue! 
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
Cheers for the facebook link.
A little warning would be nice.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: A little warning would be nice.
I added a warning. 
Once you lose your pride the rest is easy.
In the end, only three things matter: how much you loved, how gently you lived, and how gracefully you let go of things not meant for you. – Buddha
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
|
|
|
|
|
It's more the:
"HI! YOUR ACCOUNT HAS BEEN REACTIVATED!
"HAVE 23,000 FRIEND REQUESTS, AND 189,000 DOCUMENTS THAT STRANGERS HAVE DEMANDED THAT YOU TO LOOK AT, BECAUSE YOU OWE IT TO THEM TO LOOK AT THEIR GARBAGE!"
problem that bothers me.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I'll bet that many of you are not old enough to remember core memory. Yet is was the predominant form of RAM for 20 years:
[Core Memory]
So what happened to core memory? Intel - that is what happened. In 1968 a chemist (Gordon Moore) and a physicist (Robert Noyce) persuaded a venture capitalist (Arthur Rock) to raise money to fund a company that would put computer memory on a chip. Intel was registered on July 18, 1968 and the rest is history. You may read more here:
[Intel] and here: [Intel Timeline]
This brings back memories of the early 1970s when I as a young engineer was involved in computerized air traffic control systems for civilian airports. The computers had core memory modules, each holding 4 KB of data and each about .25 cubic ft in size. Ah! Them wuz the days!
modified 26-Mar-15 21:30pm.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
