|
In Latest Best Picks 
|
|
|
|
|
devathamanushya wrote: In Latest Best Picks
And you are sharing this "whatever," here, because ... ?
«I'm asked why doesn't C# implement feature X all the time. The answer's always the same: because no one ever designed, specified, implemented, tested, documented, shipped that feature. All six of those things are necessary to make a feature happen. They all cost huge amounts of time, effort and money.» Eric Lippert, Microsoft, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
During his normal boring lecture, a professor says "In some languages, a double negative is a positive, and in others, it is a stronger negative. But in no language is a double positive a negative."
And from the back of the lecture hall a voice comes, "Yeah, right!".
Meta: "Sarcasm".
Your time will come, if you let it be right.
|
|
|
|
|
Deep! I never thought of it that way! 
|
|
|
|
|
Caffeine, caffeine, I need caffeine...
(it took me a while to understand)
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've had a great deal of fun reading this blog[^]. The writing is clear and the concepts are fascinating. Oh yes, and the wonderful young neuroscience student behind it is my niece. I am inordinately proud of her.
|
|
|
|
|
Wow that's an excellent blog, and seriously one of the best ones I've read recently. Expertly combining facts into a readable and engaging format is never an easy task, but this manages it effortlessly.
Your niece has a gift. Maybe they could look into writing for New Scientist or something. Discussing scientific ideas and making them enjoyable is truly a gift. I also like the nice clean layout.
Superb 
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
I posted it because this was exactly the reaction I expected. Even though I'm not a neuroscientist, she explained things in a way that a thicky like me could understand.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: I am inordinately proud of her.
and rightly so!
This is truly, an amazing bit of work on her part. Word of mouth advertising, here we come.
|
|
|
|
|
Preface: I'm self-employed, developing and selling one single app. Without open source components that allow me to take a short route for certain tasks I wouldn't get anywhere. So I'm deeply thankful for anybody devoting their time to open source (and publishing it under a license that allows commercial use..).
One particular open source project that I benefitted a lot from is the C# protocol buffers port from Marc Gravell. From his blog I learned about the "new kid in serializer's town": "Cap'n Proto"[^]. Have a look at it if you're remotely interested in serializing stuff - it sounds absolutely amazing!
Marc Gravell started a C# port but as he's already maintaining A LOT of open source projects besides his actual work he's calling for help.[^]
Maybe you're in a company that has an interest in a C# port of Cap'n Proto and would be willing to devote some capacity to it. Or maybe you know someone who knows someone. Who knows? I thought if I can't contribute to the project myself, at least I can help spreading the word.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Manchanx, "Good on you" for taking the high-road of developing your own software !
Just in case you've missed them, CodeProject has two excellent major-league serialize/de-serialize projects for .NET C#:
1. Mehdi Gholam's fastJSON, and fastJSONBinary projects: [^], [^]. Mehdi has been developing and supporting these projects since 2011 with many, frequent, updates. imho, this project is one of the "crown jewels" of CodeProject.
2. The newer arrival (since September, 2014) by Christophe Bertrand, "Universal Serializer" [^]. imho, this project will become one of the "crown jewels."
My initial experiments with "Universal" suggest it is extremely powerful: I've been able to serialize a complete Windows Form with complex 3rd. party Controls on it, and de-serialize it back into existence with a few lines of code, and the file-size of the serialization was quite small !
Of course, I do appreciate, and respect, the work of the prolific Marc Gravell, and his collaboration with Guru's Guru Jon Skeet on Proto-Buf.
cheers, Bill
«I'm asked why doesn't C# implement feature X all the time. The answer's always the same: because no one ever designed, specified, implemented, tested, documented, shipped that feature. All six of those things are necessary to make a feature happen. They all cost huge amounts of time, effort and money.» Eric Lippert, Microsoft, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Hi Manchanx, "Good on you" for taking the high-road of developing your own software !
Hi Bill, thank you! Do you originate from Australia? I like that phrase 
Actually I found both of those articles recently but didn't get around to comparing them to protobuf in my environment yet. But I have to agree with you, those articles do look very good.
Have you had a look at Cap'n Proto? It's a completely different approach. It will (as far as I have understood it so far) not be able to serialize BCL-Classes but when having to serialize custom DTO's/POCOs it will outclass any other serializer.
Cheers, Sebastian
|
|
|
|
|
I read the article link below and it makes me wonder why people kept on insisting that IT hard skills it less relevant to IT career. People with soft skills working in IT department is not IT career. Soft skills are management and leadership trades which are applicable to IT department as well as anything else. Management can't carry out the hard technical tasks that IT skills people can and they will paid dearly to get it. In this world of constantly changing technology especially IT skills, very few are half-good at both soft and hard skills. To be very good at something, we have to devote all of our resources(time and money) to acquire and stay current with that skills.
http://www.cio.com/article/2878675/careers-staffing/why-soft-skills-are-key-to-a-successful-it-career.html[^]
Companies should stop looking for people with both skills because they are only going to get half-good skills people.
|
|
|
|
|
Leng Vang wrote: Companies should stop looking for people with both skills because they are only going to get half-good skills people.
Some people naturally have the 'soft' skills or leadership qualities regardless of any other skill sets they may have and these are very often (in my experience of only about 25 years in IT) complimentary whereas there are many more very good developers who will never be able to lead and will always make poor managers.
|
|
|
|
|
Karel Čapek wrote: developers who will never be able to lead and will always make poor managers
Yup, that's me, I keep telling them I cannot do a managers job, it took an offer to quit before they understood!
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Leng Vang wrote: Management can't carry out the hard technical tasks that IT skills people can
Bit of an overgeneralisation that. I can think of at least a dozen managers who I know who have excellent technical skills, and are good at management.
Leng Vang wrote: Companies should stop looking for people with both skills because they are only going to get half-good skills people
Complete and utter horse doo-doo. If they can find them, then great. I'd hate to have such a narrow minded bigoted view of the IT profession.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: Complete and utter horse doo-doo
That's not something someone with good soft skills would say! 
I agree with you whole-heartedly though.
My blog[ ^]
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
Actually that does show soft skills. You should see what I would have said if I didn't have them. 
|
|
|
|
|
Does it involve more excrements?
My blog[ ^]
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
Much more. Elephant loads.
|
|
|
|
|
Leng Vang wrote: Companies should stop looking for people with both skills because they are only going to get half-good skills people.
I would rather work with a person with great soft-skills and mediocre hard-skills than the other way around. I've worked with people with sh*tty communication, team, and conflict resolution skills, and it sucks -- it's aggravating, time wasting, and, in my opinion, is the primary reason I've ended up rewriting someone else's code, because they wouldn't listen and/or follow instructions. A person with good soft-skills is a lot more capable of learning and taking on new challenges. As Pete said, if you can find both in one person, that's great, but like I said, I want a good communicator first.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: A person with good soft-skills is a lot more capable of learning and taking on new challenges.
I agreed with you up to that point, but that is eminently untrue.
The ability to play nice with the other kids has nothing to do with one's intelligence or eagerness to learn.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed! 
Your time will come, if you let it be right.
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: The ability to play nice with the other kids has nothing to do with one's intelligence or eagerness to learn.
Good point, though, using communication skills in a manipulative way (which is what I call "playing nice") isn't really what I meant. I guess the concept of what a good communicator is needs to be better defined.
Marc
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
