|
Sounds right to me !
«OOP to me means only messaging, local retention and protection and hiding of state-process, and extreme late-binding of all things. » Alan Kay's clarification on what he meant by the term "Object" in "Object-Oriented Programming."
|
|
|
|
|
"Edible Basic" sounds better - or could at least be more easily digested!
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Bacon. And it is edible too.
Life is too shor
|
|
|
|
|
|
I like "HOPE" !
What does the "E" stand for ? "Enthusiasm" ? "Elegance" ? "Exoteric" ? "Exotic" ? "Érotisme" ?
And, it would be like so cool if HOPE had a scripting language named HOP, with primitives like SKIP, JUMP, FORGOTTOSAYMAYI that made some of the powerful, and complex, patterns in HOPE usable by mere mortals 
All, kidding aside: you have expressed some visionary ideas/insights about programming on CP over the years, and shown some very useful techniques for rendering C# more usable in the "functional way."
I'd like to see you, Anders, Mads, Andrew T., Eric L., Jon S., Miguel de I, Pete O', Sacha B, isolated in a rural cabin (with no internet, or telephone) for a month, and see what new language would emerge ! CodeProject could cover lawyer/legal expenses in case of divorce following your emergence, or other lawsuits, homicide defense costs, etc.
«OOP to me means only messaging, local retention and protection and hiding of state-process, and extreme late-binding of all things. » Alan Kay's clarification on what he meant by the term "Object" in "Object-Oriented Programming."
|
|
|
|
|
BillWoodruff wrote: What does the "E" stand for ?
Nothing original. "Environment"
BillWoodruff wrote: in case of divorce
I wonder how many of us are actually married. I'm not!
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: I wonder how many of us are actually married. I'm not!
Was, but I solved that problem.
|
|
|
|
|
BillWoodruff wrote: What does the "E" stand for ?
Well, "hop" would have make the reference to beer to obvious... 
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Entropy isn't what it used to.
|
|
|
|
|
BLOOD
Binary Logic Object Oriented Design
Just so I can tell people it's written in Blood.
PooperPig - Coming Soon
|
|
|
|
|
I would SO MUCH learn that language and force my entire company to adopt it as official language and rewrite the whole codebase in BLOOD.
Also I would call the coding phase as SACRIFICE. This software was sacrificated in BLOOD. Damn it sounds good.
|
|
|
|
|
Too cool. Reminds me of Slayer.
No object is so beautiful that, under certain conditions, it will not look ugly. - Oscar Wilde
|
|
|
|
|
"Hello Rob, something went wrong with Chris's BLOOD, do you know where I can get the obfuscator ?"
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Entropy isn't what it used to.
|
|
|
|
|
In the 'next great' language will be unimportant (we may call it the nil - non-important-language)...
IMHO the next step will be frameworks/environment (like Marc's HOPE) that will let you 'draw' your application logic in a completely different way...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Data Enterprise Stream Processing Action Intuiting Response: D.E.S.P.A.I.R.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
COBOL 2015 = COBBLERS.
There's a winner, if ever there were one.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
DUMB, almost immediately to be replaced by DUMBER (no, not an acronym!)
|
|
|
|
|
OOF - Object Oriented FORTH
A language that uses the objects proposed on the stack to suggest the next command based on the best consumption of the stack contents. Think IntelliType that helps you code the application.
For those of you unfamiliar with FORTH, it is a stack based language that requires that you code a command (verb in FORTH speak) before you can use it. You, in effect, create a language tailored to the application. You can even rewrite the compiler as you go by creating commands that execute immediately when they are used instead of being compiled (think intelligent macros).
The hardest part of FORTH programming is keeping track of the stack as you go. Many a stack diagram has been written just to make sure you are composing a stack for later commands to consume properly.
The limitation of FORTH, is that the stack is composed of integer values, but if they can be replaced with objects (think HP-48 calculators), it could be much more powerful.
Since each FORTH command can be executed independently, groups can write and test their assignments and then zipper their code together without fear of collision (it would be a longer explanation to show how that works), which is something I done in my career and we've been able to rack up large systems in short time frames. We can literally fling code at a wall and it will all stick.
That's been my fantasy.
Psychosis at 10
Film at 11
Those who do not remember the past, are doomed to repeat it.
Those who do not remember the past, cannot build upon it.
|
|
|
|
|
CRAP - Common Reusable Automatic Program
Two different environments:
Basic CRAP - for quick & dirty solutions
Serious CRAP - for when CRAP needs to work reliably
|
|
|
|
|
If you like the Elektra Belle Epoque[^] in the post below don't fret, there are cheaper[^] ones around.
But if you don't like the Belle Epoque you can always have a look at Alessi Aerodinamica[^] if Art Deco is your cup of tea coffee.
There is also help to get for the technology[^] freak. (actually not, but it looks like it)
Enough with this automized stuff, if you find the Japanese to be a bit sloppy in their ceremonies you should take a look at Tom Metcalfe[^]. (Sorry about the quality of the video, I couldn't find the link I was looking for)
Personally I prefer this[^], as it's a good compromise between easy to use and good coffee.
<Edit>How could I forget this[^], straight out of the bucket list, the vacuum siphon.</edit>
Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello
(√-sh*t) 2
modified 30-Nov-14 16:42pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I have caved and bought this[^] for the office.
I think it says a great deal about the state of coffee over here that these are the depths to which I plunge.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Can't wait to try it  ![Java | [Coffee]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/coffee.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello
(√-sh*t) 2
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: I have caved and bought this[^] for the office.
What a sh*t selection for the coffee. It only goes up to 11, I get the 12 over here for mine.
Michael Martin
Australia
"I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible."
- Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
|
|
|
|
|
Please don't rub it in.
Just made the first cuppa and it's...OK. My Uncle in Melbourne has one (I know - why on Earth would you have a coffee machine in Melbourne unless there was a zombie plague and you were unable to leave the house to travel the 5m to the nearest cafe) and the coffee is actually pretty good.
I think we get "American Style" coffee over here.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
... If you want your wife and the ickles to get you a new coffee machine for Crimbo: Sage: The Oracle[^]
Heston Blumenthal says it's good, but...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
