|
Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote: only if he she turns out to be a sheep
FTFY 
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't it Kerala?
"Bastards encourage idiots to use Oracle Forms, Web Forms, Access and a number of other dinky web publishing tolls.", Mycroft Holmes[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
#3 is my favourite.
Veni, vidi, vici.
|
|
|
|
|
It's a real stinker when that happens.
It happened to me once and the CP bouncers backed up by the SAS Hamster squad went knocking at their door and soon put them to shame.
Have they published the article with your name attached or as in my case did someone attribute the article author to themselves?
If it's the former than maybe try to feel flattered - if it's the latter I hear the sound of locking and loading and the patter of small feet...
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
Nope, the author seems to be 'Chinese' for the Chinese site and 'English' for the English version.
|
|
|
|
|
I can hear the Hamsters beginning to tighten their bootlaces...
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
Possibly some more CP articles too. But I tried search there but it seems not working, returned empty.
EDIT
Clickety[^]
thatrajaCode converters | Education Needed
No thanks, I am all stocked up. - Luc Pattyn
When you're wrestling a gorilla, you don't stop when you're tired, you stop when the gorilla is - Henry Minute
|
|
|
|
|
they havent nicked that bit yet
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
Shameel wrote: the date of the article appears a couple of weeks before my article to give an impression that the copying worked the other way round
I suspect he copied an earlier revision of your article. Your article had six revisions[^] at least ten days before the copy was taken.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Shameel wrote: article appears a couple of weeks before my article
Who copied who? 
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously, it's those Chinese who copy 
|
|
|
|
|
Shameel wrote: Obviously, it's those Chinese who copy
Not if you look at the date it was published. 
|
|
|
|
|
tru, but not sure how they managed to post download links to an article that wasnt yet published on CP?
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote: not sure how they managed to post download links to an article that wasnt yet published on CP
That takes talent. 
|
|
|
|
|
The date shown on the top of CP articles is the date of the last revision. On the right side you can find the initial posting date which is before the article has been copied.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indeed its copied! Just wondering how and when did you found this?
Shameel wrote: Chinese(?)
They have mastery to make replica of original things. 
Believe Yourself™
|
|
|
|
|
Bing did it. I was binging 'MultiDropdown' to check how famous my article is and it came up with these results.
|
|
|
|
|
Added my 5 cents there.
Veni, vidi, caecus | Everything summarizes to Assembly code
|
|
|
|
|
Not the candida one I hope
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
Sucks!
But you know what sucks even more? There is no rating system there, otherwise you would have a golden chance to down-vote your own article.... like a boss.
|
|
|
|
|
I looked at the version of this article and you first made it publicly available July 17, 2011, 10 days before their date.
|
|
|
|
|
WinHeist 2.0 Beta loads properly on my computer. Thanks!
Getting information off the Internet is like taking a drink from a fire hydrant.
- Mitchell Kapor
|
|
|
|
|
Awesome thanks it took a couple of tries to get it Weight ready. Enjoy
A huge thanks to Ron Beyer for his patience and help in testing!
|
|
|
|
|
Encryption of the Day
45 0 87 9 27 10 7 83 10 6 69 72 4 15 26 10 78 27 73 5 12 29 84 17 11 9 79 26 12 78 0 27 11 6 82 72 13 11 21 7 6 28 27 72 29 6 17 83 24 14 76 1 8 0 0 83 0 10 86 13 27 78 0 18 29 27 69 72 6 8 84 23 11 14 84 0 73 12 1 7 78 0 78 11 12 64
No one solved yesterday's encryption!
If no-one figures out this type of encryption then I might publish how it's done in the next few days.
Then again I might not.
Yesterday's solution: "False face must hide what the false heart doth know."
Today's hint: no hints
modified 23-Jan-14 5:39am.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
